Picture of author.
40+ Works 1,256 Members 14 Reviews 1 Favorited

About the Author

Robin Dunbar is Professor of Evolutionary Psychology at the University of Oxford and an Emeritus Fellow of Magdalen College. He is an elected Fellow of the British Academy and was co-Director of the British Academy's Centenary Research Project. He is known for the social brain hypothesis, the show more gossip theory of language evolution, and Dunbar's Number (the limit on the number of relationships that we can manage). show less
Image credit: Robin Dunbar. Photo courtesy Festival della Scienza/Cirone-Musi.

Works by Robin Dunbar

The Human Story (2004) 98 copies
The trouble with science (1995) 83 copies
Human Evolution (2014) 71 copies
BBC/Discovery: Cousins (2000) 36 copies
The World of Nature (1985) 23 copies
The Science of Love (2012) 14 copies

Associated Works

Tagged

Common Knowledge

Members

Reviews

Very informative. The author wrote in an easy to understand manner without sacrificing proper terminology. I rather enjoyed this book.
 
Flagged
pacbox | Jul 9, 2022 |
A nice overview for younger (high school and below) readers. My complaints would be too little coverage of some marquee species (e.g. only one page about orangutans), and a rather sad photo of chimpanzees eating a red colobus monkey.
 
Flagged
YESterNOw | Apr 10, 2019 |
At the core of the "Social Brain" hypothesis is the suggestion that social group size in primates is limited by the relative size of the neocortex. This posed a challenge for the early hominins who moved beyond the forest habitats occupied by their ancestors, as in open habitats, they would be more vulnerable to predators and their main defence would be that of a belonging to a larger group. At the same time, increased group size also makes direct contact between individuals more difficult. Physical grooming - a primary means of maintaining relationships in primate groups - must be replaced by other, more symbolic connections (such as language) if the group is to remain cohesive. In meeting these challenges, our ancestors embarked on a process of brain evolution which facilitated larger effective group sizes and the transmission of innovations over long distances and between widely scattered groups. This capacity to handle large, dispersed, social networks is the key to human evolution.

It's a persuasive thesis. However, it is significant that this book does not represent a balanced synthesis of all the disciplines which have contributed to the "Social Brain" hypothesis. Rather, it emphasises the work of the 7 year long "Lucy to Language" project which focused on the archaeological evidence. and the book reflects the strengths and weaknesses of this emphasis.

I tend to look for strong evidence and assess it objectively. I found the evidence for the rule of three and Dunbar's number, as presented, a little weak, given that humans tend to find patterns even in random numbers. More particularly, the aspect that I found most disconcerting is that, in places, the book asserted the social brain hypothesis as though it were established fact, thereby displaying a rather worrying bias, given that many, if not most, people do not accept that the hypothesis is well established. In other parts, the book was much more cautious about the speculation that group size drove brain size and hence human evolution. With the addition of more objective skepticism, the account made for more pleasant and indeed, for me as an outsider, very interesting reading.

It is relevant to add that, great apes aside, there is much less evidence for the social patterns of our hominid ancestors and one can well take the view that even wild speculation is better than nothing (provided that it is not taken too seriously). In Thinking Big, the speculation is mostly carefully explained. All in all, it seemed to me to be a valiant attempt to peer through the mists surrounding our prehistoric past, albeit that I did not always find the assertions about the glimpsed apparition convincing.
… (more)
1 vote
Flagged
djjazzyd | 1 other review | Jan 13, 2019 |
I wanted to enjoy this, but I got to p. 38 and realized that the physical copy I was reading actually Stinks. Yes, like tomcat piss or something similar. Ironically apt, eh?

So, I peeked ahead some, and read a bunch of reviews here, and I realized that the reason I had only gotten that far, despite picking the book up several times, is that too much of it is background, nothing I've not read about before. And the thesis apparently doesn't get articulated until the last chapter.

Moreover, to this interested layperson, the thesis seems to be a common-sense aphorism. Of course language developed, at least in part, to aid in family & tribal communication, and communication developed, at least in part, to aid us to find allies, forge alliances, claim our status, and find our role in our group culture.

Maybe I'm still misunderstanding his claim. Maybe I'd be more intrigued if I were familiar with what theses of the early development of language he's making a claim against. But for now, this copy will get aired out thoroughly, and then released via bookcrossing.* And I won't try to find another copy. Thanks to the wonderful GR reviewers who helped me come to this decision by writing such careful reviews!

*to clarify, the book is not dirty or contaminated - the paper itself smells yucky to me... and I'm very sensitive; I'm sure most people wouldn't notice.
… (more)
 
Flagged
Cheryl_in_CC_NV | 4 other reviews | Jun 5, 2016 |

Lists

You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Statistics

Works
40
Also by
2
Members
1,256
Popularity
#20,422
Rating
½ 3.7
Reviews
14
ISBNs
108
Languages
10
Favorited
1

Charts & Graphs