Picture of author.

Philip L. Fradkin (1935–2012)

Author of Wallace Stegner and the American West

17+ Works 614 Members 10 Reviews

About the Author

Philip L. Fradkin is the author of eight critically acclaimed nonfiction books on the American West and Alaska. At the Los Angeles Times he shared a Pulitzer Prize for coverage of the Watts racial conflict, was a correspondent in Vietnam, and was the newspaper's first environmental writer. Fradkin show more was the assistant secretary of the California Resources Agency and western editor of Audubon magazine. He has taught writing courses at the University of California at Berkeley, where he is a consultant to the Bancroft Library, and a California history course at Stanford University. He lives on the coast north of San Francisco show less
Image credit: Philip Fradkin

Series

Works by Philip L. Fradkin

Associated Works

Tagged

Common Knowledge

Members

Reviews

Entertaining while being full of details of historical moments in the history of the American West. If you want to know what really happened at the fight at the O. K. Corral, read Fradkin's version. He also provides a detailed explanation of the development and history of the Pony Express.

The book follows the history of Wells Fargo from stagecoach and express company to the first company to develop and use refrigeration rail cars to move fresh fruits and vegetables across the Continent. Wells Fargo's survival as a very successful bank today is also chronicled. A wonderful and readable book.… (more)
 
Flagged
lamour | Jan 24, 2021 |
EARTHQUAKE, FIRE DESTROYS SAN FRANCISCO!!! WOMEN, MINORITIES HARDEST HIT!!!

Well, that’s sometimes the way Philip Fradkin’s The Great Earthquake and Firestorms of 1906 sometimes reads. Fradkin is a journalist of the “Everything bad is somebody’s fault” school, and “somebody” apparently doesn’t include Saint Andreas, as the subtitle is “How San Francisco Nearly Destroyed Itself”, implying that tectonics had nothing to do with it.


It is perhaps a little annoying that there’s a lot to like about the book. The introduction got me riled; Fradkin, as implied above, makes a bunch of snide comparisons to 9/11 and Katrina; then notes how horribly undemocratic the reconstruction of San Francisco was, with local politicians, businessmen and the military in an unholy alliance to restore the city to some sort of function without waiting for input from women, Japanese-Americans, Chinese-Americans, Afro-Americans, Native Americans, Italian-Americans, environmentalists, religious minorities, citizen’s groups, and sea otters; and finally comments that he has examined the science of seismology and “found it wanting”. Once he actually gets going on describing the earthquake and fire, however, he does a good job; he reviewed a lot of first person reports and tells a gripping story. Fradkin doesn’t go into a lot of detail on earthquake geology, rupture traces, etc.; he does criticize contemporary geologists for not realizing San Francisco was vulnerable – while also noting that current geological theory at the time linked earthquakes to volcanoes. The earthquake itself probably didn’t cause all that many casualties; some buildings collapsed but survivors could have been dug out – except broken gas lines, overturned lamps and stove, and severed water lines set everything on fire. In most cases the fire department was helpless (the fire chief was one of the earthquake fatalities); the only water available was near the waterfront where ships could pump sea water as far as hoses stretched. Unfortunately, the city was a supply base for mines, and that meant there was plenty of explosive on hand. Fire fighters, soldiers, and ordinary citizens got enthusiastic about blowing things up to create firebreaks and tended to use way too much explosive, scattering little bits of the targeted buildings all over – and generally starting more fires.


To be fair, the earthquake and aftermath did hit women and minorities pretty hard, at least by 2012 standards; Fradkin reports a soldier shooting a “Negro man … who was bending over something on the ground” and who didn’t respond to a challenge. The body was thrown into the flames; there’s no report on what the man was looking at. Upper-class San Francisco citizens bragged about looting Chinatown, and extracting ornamental bronzes from the runs – unmolested by the same soldiers. Contemporary accounts, of course, we not exactly prejudice-free; numerous rumors circulated about “(insert favorite race here) were found with their pockets full of severed fingers and ears, still with rings and earrings in place”. No actual evidence of this sort of thing was found, of course. San Franciscans were just a little touchy about the “yellow peril”. A Japanese professor visited shortly after the quake, bringing the world’s most advanced seismograph as a gift; he was stoned in the street.


Fradkin gets a little testy again describing the rebuilding; as mentioned, he grouses about the fact that the reconstruction campaign was handled by the city’s politicians and businessmen. He does not, of course, have any suggestions on how it should have been done. To be fair, what happened was various special committees were set up that bypassed the normal political processes; I assume Fradkin would have been happier if the city’s elected officials had handled things – despite the fact that the last third of the book implies that all the elected officials were corrupt, or at least questionable. Once again, though, the actual description of the committees and their actions is pretty well handled.


There was a lot of post-earthquake scientific study – the San Andreas Fault passes right through the Stanford campus – but here Fradkin may have a case for collusion among business and politicians. It was thought that mentioning the earthquake would have an adverse effect on capital needed for rebuilding, and although the studies were not suppressed the print run was very limited. Fradkin notes that the first geologic map of the whole state of California, published in 1916, did not denote any faults – even though the 1906 fault trace was still plainly visible. The official story was that it was the Great San Francisco Fire, not the Great San Francisco Earthquake.


The last third of the book is perhaps a little out of place. Fradkin describes a vendetta by political boss and businessman James Phelan against political boss and businessman Abraham Ruef. Although this happened in the years after the earthquake – Ruef was convicted in 1911 – it doesn’t seem related to it; Ruef and his associates were not charged with any corruption in connection to the earthquake or reconstruction efforts. The only charge that held against Ruef was bribery in connection with issuing liquor licenses to “French restaurants” – apparently a contemporary euphemism for brothels – and all the reported bribery took place before the earthquake. Once again, Fradkin’s account is pretty interesting – during the trial, a prosecuting attorney was shot in the courtroom and the San Francisco Chief of Police apparently committed suicide by jumping into the bay from a police launch – but it doesn’t really have much to do with seismology.


Thus, if you can get past the political snarkiness, this is fairly interesting. A spate of books were published for the 100th anniversary of the earthquake; I’ve got some more to read and review.
… (more)
½
 
Flagged
setnahkt | 2 other reviews | Dec 23, 2017 |
Every couple of years I seem to end up reading about California quakes. I'm lucky enough to be in a geologically inert part of the state, but it's always good to be aware of what's possible. Fradkin looks at earthquakes along the San Andreas fault, starting with some 18th century Spanish accounts and ending with the 1994 Northridge quake. Very good reading, though it made me desperately want to go live somewhere where the ground stays put. I only wish the book were a little more up-to-date: the publication date is 1999.… (more)
 
Flagged
melonbrawl | Feb 25, 2015 |
A gift from Adam. Thanks Adam! This history is crazy crazy - San Francisco actually blew itself up. You'd think they'd be smarter than that, but the answer is no. They were trying to create some sort of break in the buildings to stop the fire from spreading, but they used incendiary explosives, and just wound up creating more fires. Also has a short snippet about how Bank of America started out. Awesome-possum book.
 
Flagged
AmberTheHuman | 2 other reviews | Aug 30, 2013 |

Awards

You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Statistics

Works
17
Also by
1
Members
614
Popularity
#40,946
Rating
½ 3.7
Reviews
10
ISBNs
33

Charts & Graphs