Over forty million books on members' bookshelves.

Members with Dickison's books

RSS feeds

Recently-added books

Dickison's reviews

Reviews of Dickison's books, not including Dickison's

 

Member: Dickison

CollectionsYour library (1,890)

Reviews10 reviews — see reviews

Tagsscience (268), philosophy (162), spirituality (156), Audible (152), psychology (142), religion (129), physics (125), audio (118), eastern philosophy (108), fiction (108) — see all tags

Cloudstag cloud, author cloud

GroupsA Pearl of Wisdom and Enlightenment, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Books that made me think, Cheating The Ferryman, Desiring God, Entheogens, Hawaii, INTPs, Japanese Culture, Languageshow all groups

About meMy prime motivation is trying to understand the nature of reality. What is all this I perceive around me? What is the nature of space, time, consciousness? What is the nature of our spiritual inclinations? Is there a soul?

As a result of these questions I am interested in science in general and physics in particular in addition to mythology and the paranormal. I tend to be an eclectic quester and paradigm buster.

Arthur C. Clarke's three laws hint at the nature of my views and interests:

Clarke's First Law: "When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong."

Clarke's Second Law: "The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible."

Clarke's Third Law: "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."

Or, as Isaac Asimov said "..in every century people have thought they understood the Universe at last, and in every century they were proved to be wrong. It follows that the one thing we can say about our modern 'knowledge' is that it is wrong."

The reason for the interest in the paranormal, as Clarke's Laws hint at, is that I feel that that is where the current paradigms fall apart and can be reconstructed with better understanding, that is if any of it is more than delusion/confusion. And, paradoxically, there's too much there to be nothing, but frustratingly, not enough there to be something. Or so it seems...

I am interested in the nature of religion, not that I believe any of it, but that it shows up throughout our history seems to indicate there is something to it; whether it is subjective or objective is yet to be determined.

"A knowledge of the existence of something we cannot penetrate, of the manifestations of the profoundest reason and the most radiant beauty - it is this knowledge and this emotion that constitute the truly religious attitude; in this sense, and in this alone, I am a deeply religious man." (Albert Einstein)

"The religion of the future will be a cosmic religion. It should transcend personal God and avoid dogma and theology. Covering both the natural and the spiritual, it should be based on a religious sense arising from the experience of all things natural and spiritual as a meaningful unity. Buddhism answers this description. If there is any religion that could cope with modern scientific needs it would be Buddhism." (Albert Einstein)

I desire to gather as many explanations for events as possible and have an intuition that there may be great value hidden within things that society has thrown away. I search for understanding by looking for alternative interpretations of everything I think I know and find.

I tend to believe those who are seeking the truth but doubt those who find it.

I am still learning. It seems I am in a state of perpetual inquiry. I feel the journey is the reward.

My educational background is I have a B.S. degree in Applied Mathematics from Sophia University, Tokyo, Japan, 1975 and a B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 1984. I am a member of IEEE, Society for Scientific Exploration, Friends of the Institute for Astronomy, MUFON, and Mensa.

About my library"Each reader reads only what is already within himself. The book is only a sort of optical instrument which the writer offers to the reader to enable the latter to discover in himself what he would not have found but for the aid of the book."

--Marcel Proust, The Past Recaptured

Also onAIM, MSN Messenger

Real nameRichard Dickison

LocationKapolei, Hawaii

EmailDickison.RichardGMail.com

Favorite authorsNone

Account typepublic, lifetime

Connection NewsConnection News

URLs http://www.librarything.com/profile/Dickison (profile)
http://www.librarything.com/catalog/Dickison (library)

Common KnowledgeSeries (94), Awards (130), Characters (867), Places (281)

Member sinceNov 27, 2005

Leave a comment

"The secret history of the world" sounds like a very interesting book. Does it correspond with anything Zecharia Sitchin or Lawrence Gardener describe in their books? Let me know if you think it is a worth the $40.
Help/FAQs | About | Privacy/Terms | Blog | Contact | APIs | WikiThing | Common Knowledge | 41,227,836 books!