Random books from dressel26's library

An archaeological perspective by Lewis R. Binford

Catalan by Alan Yates

The once and future king by T. H. White

An introduction to Old French by William W. Kibler

Outline of a theory of practice by Pierre Bourdieu

Ever since Darwin : reflections in natural history by Stephen Jay Gould

Hornblower and the Hotspur by C. S. Forester

Members with dressel26's books

Member connections

Interesting libraries: cshalizi, eromsted, kirja

RSS Feeds

Recently-added books

dressel26's reviews

Reviews of dressel26's books, not including dressel26's

 

Member: dressel26

Library780 books — see library

Reviews6 reviews — see reviews

Cloudstag cloud, author cloud

Tagsarchaeology (167), history (160), fiction (153), modern (105), anthropology (99), Roman (98), United States (57), Europe (56), excavation (51), medieval (48) — see all tags

GroupsAncient History, Archaeologists, Dewey Decimal Challenge, Editors, Researchers, Whatever, Food History, Late Roman, LC Classification Challenge, Lingua Latina, Medieval Europe

Favorite authorsLewis R. Binford, Fernand Braudel, John W. Hayes (Shared favorites)

Favorite bookstoresBarnes & Noble Main Store, Strand Bookstore

Favorite librariesAvery Architectural & Fine Arts Library, Columbia University - Butler Library, New York Public Library - Humanities and Social Sciences Library

About me Archaeologist, editor, and compulsive book-hoarder.

About my library I'm slowly entering them, in order by shelf or pile or box. I'm about a third of the way through now, I think. Still to be done: most of the archaeology shelves, all of ancient and medieval history shelves, and the piles and boxes containing most of the books in these sections (as well as a few from other sections) acquired since the late 1990s.

Real nameDavid

LocationNew York

Account typepublic, lifetime

Connection NewsConnection News

URLs http://www.librarything.com/profile/dressel26 (profile)
http://www.librarything.com/catalog/dressel26 (library)

Member sinceFeb 4, 2006

Comments from other LibraryThing-ers

(Leave a comment.)

Away for summer fieldwork.
Just noticed your collection of FCR literature. Working on a project? Last summer, we ended up finding a few tightly clustered accumulations of FCR, which I interpreted as being from the user having dumped out the bag or pot. Any suggestions for references on that?
Woo Hoo! Willey and Phillips!

I just reread that one. Good stuff. Somewhat problematic, but they acknowledge where it's problematic.
I'm thinking that if I already want to do more varied reading, I probably shouldn't start a Ph.D. immediately (though it's so easy to get caught in academia: they'll give me money to stay in school, so I might as well do it). Editing does sound like fun. What exactly does it entail? I'm sort of worried that if I'm forced to read all the time I might not enjoy it as much. The other career prospect I'm currently considering is high school/elementary teaching. Some high schools at least still offer Latin.
Oh, I'm starting to look forward to being done with grad school so that I can read all sorts of different things for a change. Being a professional dilettante sounds quite appealing. Of course, I can imagine that once I actually do have the freedom to read anything I want I'll suddenly find that everything I'm being forced to read now seems much more interesting :)
Good call on moving the discussion to profile comments :)

I do like citations to a certain extent, but it sometimes gets to a point where the flow of the reading is disrupted too much by looking at a citation every two or three sentences, especially when they're citing the same few authors again and again. I don't need to look up every last detail in the relevant passage of Plato or Aristotle, for instance. I do like notes if they have content beyond just a reference to another work, and I completely agree that I'd rather have footnotes than endnotes. I also really enjoy annotated bibliographies. But like you, I don't tend to pay much attention to the critical apparatus.

Thanks for explaining about the problem with translating military terms. I feel somehow better knowing that I can dislike the translation not just because I didn't understand it, but because the underlying principal is flawed. I think it would be much more useful to leave technical terms untranslated and provide a glossary at the back explaining precisely what they mean.

Leave your comment

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

Help/FAQs | About | Privacy/Terms | Blog | Contact | LibraryThing.fr/de/nl/it/es/dk | WikiThing | Common Knowledge | 29,564,406 books!