Members with habibi81's books

Member connections

Friends: Superflicka

RSS feeds

Recently-added books

habibi81's reviews

Reviews of habibi81's books, not including habibi81's

 

Member: habibi81

CollectionsYour library (321), Currently reading (1), All collections (321)

Reviews1 review

Tagsspanish (6), linguistics (6), gay (5), not-own (5), english (3), us (3), poetry (3), spain (2), enlish (2), not-owned (2) — see all tags

Cloudstag cloud, author cloud

GroupsNone

Also onBlogger, Flickr, Last.fm

Emailhabibi81gmail.com

Favorite authorsNone

Account typepublic, lifetime

Connection NewsConnection News

URLs http://www.librarything.com/profile/habibi81 (profile)
http://www.librarything.com/catalog/habibi81 (library)

Common KnowledgeSeries (21), Awards (139), Characters (504), Places (112)

Member sinceSep 4, 2006

Currently readingNocilla Experience by Agustín Fernández Mallo

Leave a comment

Sorry to have not responded earlier, But I have been in Russia since February, and internet coverage is spotty at best. I have also not had my copy of George Yule's book with me, as it resides in Scotland. But I see you have already been replied to. Just wanted to apologize for my lack of follow-up.
When a group of words can be differentiated, each one from the others, by changing one phoneme (always in the same position), then we have a minimal set. Thus, a minimal set based on the vowel phonemes of English would include feat, fit, fat, fate, fought, foot, and one based on consonants could have big, pig, rig, fig, dig, wig.

Phonotactics

This type of exercise involving minimal sets also allows us to see that there are indeed definite patterns to the types of sound combinations permitted in a language. In English, the minimal set we have just listed does not included forms such as lig or vig. As far as I know, these are not English words, but they can be viewed as possible English words. That is, your phonological knowledge of the pattern of sounds in English words would allow you to treat these forms as acceptable if, at some future time, they came into use. They represent 'accidental' gaps in the vocabulary of English.
Help/FAQs | About | Privacy/Terms | Blog | Contact | APIs | WikiThing | Common Knowledge | 46,090,783 books!