Random books from jjwilson61's library
Studying effectively; a manual of answers to two major questions which confront every student: 1. What are my study by C. Gilbert Wrenn
The Mother, The Son, And The Socialite: The True Story Of A Mother-Son Crime Spree (St. Martin's True Crime Library) by Adrian Havill
C, the complete reference by Herbert Schildt
Professional ASP.NET 2.0 by Bill Evjen
Betrayal: : The Story of Aldrich Ames, an American Spy by Tim Weiner
Good Housekeeping Illustrated Cookbook by Zoe Coulson
Members with jjwilson61's books
RSS Feeds
Member: jjwilson61
Library595 books — see library
ReviewedNone so far
Cloudstag cloud, author cloud
Tagsfor recs (492), @living room (343), fiction (207), @colleen's (160), fantasy (127), @bedroom (99), computer (81), history (71), @textbook (61), science (58) — see all tags
Groups40-Something Library Thingers, Atheism and humanism, Autism Awareness, Board for Extreme Thing Advances, Brights, Build the Open Shelves Classification, Californians Who LT, Cognitive Science, Combiners!, Common Knowledge and WikiThing — show all groups
Favorite authorsStephen Jay Gould, Steven Pinker, J. R. R. Tolkien, Roger Zelazny (Shared favorites)
About me Unemployed programmer (anyone need an Algol programmer?)
About my library I entered all of my books, my wife's books, ancient textbooks, cookbooks, and decade old travel guides (I can be a bit obsessive).
Also onLinkedIn
LocationMission Viejo, CA
Emailjjwilson61
cox.net
Account typepublic, lifetime
Connection NewsConnection News
URLs
http://www.librarything.com/profile/jjwilson61 (profile)
http://www.librarything.com/catalog/jjwilson61 (library)
Member sinceSep 27, 2005








Leave a comment
Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.
posted by DisassemblyOfReason at 12:52 pm (EST) on Sep 23, 2008
Abby
posted by ablachly at 4:18 pm (EST) on May 9, 2008
I had FORTRAN II (before it got strings)
I keep waiting for these to come back.
Waiting...waiting...
posted by guido47 at 10:44 pm (EST) on Apr 21, 2008
Thank you. I've looked there before but not found it.
Meanwhile, I note that some illiterate ass has marked -- also in MY catalog -- The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (including that which is part of "The Oxford Mark Twain," thus wiping out that correct designation) as "Tom Sawyer (2)".
But I'd better not change it, else I be "Warned" and beat up on yet again for preferring accuracy over stupidity.
posted by JNagarya at 2:55 pm (EST) on Apr 7, 2008
Which, of course, as I deatialed, doesn't necessarily make them a "series".
"However, rather than discuss it here between just you and me, I think that it would make more sense to discuss it on the talk thread I posted so some sort of agreement as to what a series is can be made amnong the whole LT community."
At this point I'm not interested. I've looked for, but not finding anything, queried Abby about the basics of "How to Scan Book Covers," but have't got response to that. I simply want out of the "Community Knowledge" "feature" so I no longer have to tolerate MY catalog being peppered with others' errors and non-standard subjectivisms, so then can eliminate or change them in MY catalog without being "warned" and hammered for having the gall to do so.
"(And do you realize that you can edit your library views to remove the shared Common Knowledge fields?)"
I've been told that -- this instance being about the third time -- but my queries -- of which there have been at least three in various forms -- as to "How" to do that have not been answered.
I began building my library at 12. Most/all my science fiction (as example) was published during the 1960s, bought upon first (paperback) publication, many of those first edition. I established my own card catalog in the early 1970s, which I've been in the process of liquidating, as I've maintained a computer database of my library since the 1980s.
There was a time when working with and potentially refining my library cataloging -- based directly upon and conformant with standards -- was a specifically private means of peace, stress reduction, and relaxation "away from the world". Not any more.
posted by JNagarya at 11:20 am (EST) on Apr 7, 2008
If "The Complete Works of George Orwell" (as example) is not a series -- not that it's especially relevant -- then what is it? Otherwise, the "happenstance" or "coincidence" that a writer might write two or more short stories or novels (or whatever) with the same characters does not by itself a "series" make.
posted by JNagarya at 11:04 am (EST) on Apr 7, 2008
An easier instance: There apparently exists a "Complete Works of George Orwell" series. However, my edition of 1984 is published by The New American Library, as a "Signet" book. There is no "Signet" Orwell series called "Complete Works of George Orwell," therefore it is not part of, or properly identified as being part of, a "Complete Works of George Orwell" series (and yet I've had to tolerate that improper categorization in MY catalog because someone does get the fact that not ever book in pront by Orwell is part of that precisous "series").
My edition of Orwells Down and Out in Paris and London is a very early paper edition published not as a "Signet" but rather by Ace or Avon. And my Animal Farm is either a first edition or book club edition hardcover, published neither by The New American Library, nor by Ace, nor by Avon.
The same goes for my various Frank Herbert Dune books: none were identified at the time published -- and bought -- as volumes in an ongoing "series"; that was only a result of later hindsight, and perhaps specific statements by Herbert after he came to recognize that they were something like a "series. (Were there a "Complete Works of Frank Herbert" "series," would my Berkley Medallion edition of The Santaroga Barrier belong to it -- even if the weries had the same publisher? No, because when publshed my editon was not intended as such; it's in the publication details.)
Perhaps the best example is my Twain -- none of those instances being different than this: I have every volume in "The Oxford Mark Twain" series (if even that is a correct designation, as none of the individual volumes is part of a "series" with any other, even though four have the same characters), each of which is expressly identified, as example, at the top of the dustjacket face as "The Oxford Mark Twain". At the same time I have other editions of various of those volumes by publishers other than Oxford, therefore they are not part of that "series".
In addition, and more closely: I have Twain volumes identified as part of the "series" "The Writings of Mark Twain". However, one of those is a relatviely standard-sized hardcover, while all the others are small-format "limp leather" bound. Same "series" identification, and even same publisher, but different editions, therefore not actually of the same "series".
Take Asimov's "Robot" stories: they are not part of the "Foundation" series -- yet someone has identified them as such in "Commmunity Knowledge" tagging (which inaccuracy infuritates because it affects MY catalog, and yet I get beat up on for eliminating that error, which has several times been reentered by whoever hangs onto and insists upon that error; now I don't touch it -- I simply want out of that "feature," as that appears to be the only means to avoid having MY catalog peppered with others' inaccuracies and errors). The "Robot" stories are, rather, short stories, written over a period of time, then gathered together, as an "afterthought," into a single volume. That goes for both volumes of his "Robot" stories: not a series in any sense.
Nor does the fact that a number of short stories, or novels, has the same characters make them ipso facto series; see as examples The Adventures of Tom Sawyer, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Tom Sawyer Abroad, and Tom Sawyer, Detective/i>. In order for them to be a "series," they would have to be expressly identified by the author (and the author could be in error as regards standard) as being such, or one would have to pick up where the other left off (or make express connection between the current and the prior).
Even then there are exceptions: though Huck Finn was intended by Twain to be a "sequel" to Tom Sawyer, and it makes express reference to Tom Sawyer -- both to the character and the book -- Huck Finn as a book ended up being of so qualitatively different (most immeditate difference: Tom Sawyer was intended as a "boys' book" -- and is clearly that; Huck Finn is by no means a mere "boys' book") that one cannot even begin to perceive them as parts of a "series". Those, as do Abroad and Detective, have (some of) the same characters, but are actually independent, "stand-alone" novels and novellas.
posted by JNagarya at 10:03 am (EST) on Apr 7, 2008
Because, at very least, my edition is not part of any "series". (Nor did the author itend it as a volume in a "series".) Exactly as my several Orwell editions are not part of some "Complete Works of George Orwell," though they are currently, for about the third time, incorrectly identified as being such.
And exactly as only one of each of my multiple copies of The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and Adventures of Huckleberry Finn are part of "The Oxford Mark Twain" series.
And exactly as my edition of Verne's The Msyterious Island is titled The Mysterious Island, not Captain Nemo volume whateverthehell, as it is, for at least the third time, incorrectly identified as being such.
So far, I have a bit over 1,000 of nearly 3,000 volumes entered into my catalog. Some of those are not yet complete as to fulll details. It is especially frustrating to have repeatedly to correct the inclusions of editions I have in "series" of which they are not part, but into which they are somehow dragged.
At this point I simply want to know how to turn off the "Community Knowledge" "feature" so I can eliminate that problem, instead of being hammered for correcting it in MY catalog.
posted by JNagarya at 5:13 pm (EST) on Apr 6, 2008
We're up and rolling on the GEB read at http://www.librarything.com/talktopic.ph...
Looking forward to your comments. Jim
posted by torus34 at 7:36 am (EST) on Apr 1, 2008
posted by margad at 7:04 pm (EST) on Feb 17, 2008
posted by margad at 9:30 pm (EST) on Feb 9, 2008
posted by xtien at 4:59 am (EST) on Dec 13, 2007
posted by ginnyday at 12:56 pm (EST) on Dec 10, 2007
posted by lilbrattyteen at 12:59 am (EST) on Nov 18, 2007
How did you like 2001: A Space Odyssey?
posted by lilbrattyteen at 3:35 am (EST) on Nov 11, 2007
Sorry to seem so contrary (and incoherent) on Book Talk.
Fact is I don't like 'Science,' period, but have a horror of it's being popularised (the kind of thing, I regret to say, Stevie Pinker gets up to, and S.J.Gould!!)
Popular 'Religion' strikes me the same way (from the opposite direction, perhaps)
The most interesting thing about either category (S or R) - for morons like me, at any rate - is the difficulty of doing it well.
The world already has too many 'experts', university graduates and so forth, who (invariably alas) confuse wisdom with mere cleverness, and a humane education with a loft full of paperbacks.
It's the mavericks and odd-bods rather than the establishment cronies who are worth our while, but hardly ever have a following. There's probably some inverse relation between popularity and real class.
The best pedagogues, I reckon, make their subject MORE difficult, not less.
Here endeth the harangue.
It was good of you (and much appreciated) to respond.
Have a nice day.
R.
posted by reuchlin at 11:34 am (EST) on Oct 1, 2007
I just wanted to personally apologize for my post on the movie thread
I removed it, so feel free to go back and try it again
If you knew me, you'd know I'm truly the last person who would do this
I just typed without thinking
I'm a kid, I do that sometimes.
Again I'm so so sorry for what I did.
posted by gpwts at 12:47 am (EST) on Aug 4, 2007
posted by eagle52997 at 12:51 am (EST) on Jul 1, 2007