Members with julieryc's books

RSS Feeds

Recently-added books

julieryc's reviews

Reviews of julieryc's books, not including julieryc's

 

Member: julieryc

Library1,769 books — see library

ReviewedNone so far

Cloudstag cloud, author cloud

Tagsfiction (398), star trek (331), science fiction (315), nonfiction (188), history (105), science (19), american history (14), biology (13), ancient history (12) — see all tags

Groups18th-19th Century Britain, Ancient History, Children's Fiction, Children's Literature, FantasyFans, Historical Fiction, Hogwarts Express, Lost In A Good Book, Medieval Europe, Music to read byshow all groups

Favorite authorsJane Austen, Peter David, Jasper Fforde, Jean Plaidy, J.K. Rowling, J.R.R. Tolkien, Alison Weir (Shared favorites)

About me Fiction quotes:

"To know a man's library is, to some extent, to know his mind." -from March

"Yet it would be your duty to bear it, if you could not avoid it: it is weak and silly to say that you cannot bear what it is your fate to be required to bear." -Helen Burns, from Jane Eyre

"I have not been in the habit of brooking disappointment."
"That will make Your Ladyship's situation at present more pitiable; but it will have no effect on me."
-Lady Catherine de Bourgh and Lizzy Bennet, from Pride and Prejudice

"'Is it my imagination, Kebron," Soleta asked slowly, 'or is everyone on this vessel preoccupied with romance?'
'Not me.'
'No?' she asked.
'I don't need romance,' Zak Kebron told her confidently. 'I have goldfish.'
Soleta wisely didn't pursue it."
-from Star Trek: New Frontier

Non-fiction:

"Egad, sir, I do not know whether you will die on the gallows or of the pox."
"That will depend, my Lord, on whether I embrace your principles or your mistress."
-exchange between John Wilkes and the Earl of Sandwich, taken from John Wilkes

"God does not play dice."
"Einstein, stop telling God what to do!"
-Einstein and Niels Bohr, from Einstein

Humor:

"As you know if you've ever been subjected to modern medical care, the whole theory is that if they can make you feel awful enough, you'll begin to look back on your original ailment with actual fondness. They take out all your blood and put you in a tiny room where they expose you repeatedly to daytime television, and every few hours total strangers come in and give you Jell-O and stab you with small medical harpoons and insert tubes at random into your body. Then they say, 'Are you feeling BETTER NOW? Or perhaps we should give you some MORE MEDICAL CARE HAHAHAHA.'" --Dave Barry

I'm a first-year pharmacy student who particularly enjoys reading and writing. Jane Austen is my absolute favorite writer of all time, with Pride and Prejudice as my favorite novel (Persuasion runs a close second, and I really have to say the only Austen novel I'm not that fond of is Emma, and perhaps sections of Northanger Abbey.) Given that I'm a LotR, Harry Potter, and Star Trek fan, I'd say that I'm pretty geeky. In general, I'll try to finish anything I start; a book has to be pretty wretched for me not to finish it (see list below.)

About my library It's a wide variety, including a smattering of young adult, historical fiction, lots and lots of non-fiction (primarily in history, biography, and biology/infectious diseases), and Star Trek books (TNG, DS9, NF, and VOY.) I also have fantasy, sci-fi, and just about every other genre excepting horror, romance, and poetry. Anything that's unrated generally means I haven't read it yet. I intend to tag everything eventually (note: the classics tag is for books either about or written in antiquity, generally Greek or Roman in nature, not classics like Jane Eyre, Pride and Prejudice, et al.) For now, I'm considering it a small achievement just to have catalogued everything I own (excepting books that are actually collections of comic strips - FoxTrot, Calvin and Hobbes, etc., and a shelf's worth of old books I've acquired at used book sales and haven't yet gotten around to deciding if I'm going to keep or not.) I tend to hang on to books.

The WORST books I've read lately are listed below, and a brief summary of why. I was unable to finish these books, which is a rarity for me; in general, I read until something's done. These books were all in my library at some point in time, but I actually got rid of them (donating them to the library and thus inflicting them on some poor unsuspecting person at a book sale.)

Thornfield Hall. The characters were unrecognizable, the plot awful, the writing worse; published fanfiction of the worst sort.

The Phantom of Manhattan. Actually, I read this a long time ago, but it was also so terrible as to still make this list. Godawful published fanfiction, terribly written and completely uncompelling.

The Witch of Cologne. When the evil lustful Inquisitor took out his violin and began playing during a torture session, I gave up.

Nectar from a Stone. Completely and utterly predictable. It felt like a waste of time to keep reading.

God's War (A history of the Crusades.) I like history, but this was deadly dull. There was nothing factually bad or particularly awful, it was just mind-numbingly boring.

A People's History of Science. I gave up after the Greek chapter, which advocates bad research (Bernal) in the name of political screed, completely misinterprets Plato, and attempts to quote Herodotus as being an accurate source on linguistics, just to name a few major issues I had with the book. I had no trust in the author left after that chapter, and it felt less like a history of science and more like a professor who decides that disseminating their political beliefs are integral to teaching your molecular biology course.

Anne Boleyn: A New History of England's Tragic Queen. I'm all good with the opinion of Anne Boleyn as not as bad as Spanish propaganda paints her, and there's some good material on her early life, but the author seems to believe that Catherine of Aragon must be EVIL! (yes, with that much emphasis on EVIL!) in order for Anne to have been a decent person. But what made this book unfinishable was the whacking-over-the-head with the author's evangelical beliefs. It comes off as completely and utterly vitriolic and fire-spewing, not to mention unnecessarily offensive (particularly as the author feels the need to *prove* Catholicism, both then and now, as being wrong in order to vindicate Anne.)

Worst Book I've Actually Finished (Lately): His Dark Materials, The Amber Spyglass. Because there's nothing like ruining a good fantasy by whacking your reader over their head with obvious, screaming metaphor over and over and over until they want to fling the book across the room. (Disclaimer: Yes, I am Catholic. But I don't like the ending to Narnia, either.)

Runner-Up: Dan Brown, either the Da Vinci Code or Angels and Demons, by virtue of the fact that if you've read one, the other is completely predictable and therefore just badly written dreck.

And Most Depressing Book in my Library: The Thrall's Tale. Well-written, but I don't recommend it. Every time you don't think things can get worse, they do. And it NEVER GETS HAPPY. (I suppose the same goes for Atonement, but that's not currently in my library.)

Also onFacebook

Real nameJulie

LocationMI

Account typepublic, lifetime

Connection NewsConnection News

URLs http://www.librarything.com/profile/julieryc (profile)
http://www.librarything.com/catalog/julieryc (library)

Member sinceAug 12, 2006

Comments from other LibraryThing-ers

(Leave a comment.)

Posted my blog about Joan of Arc last night.

The courses you said you have taken are all subjects I enjoy reading about. A few months ago I read a book about neurobiology and music (written for a popular audience, I admit, but a very enjoyable one -- I blogged that one, too, if you're interested) and am always keeping an eye open for anything interesting in the modest biology section of the local Borders.

I agree with your parents that writing is best on the side if you've got other, more marketable, talents. And you are going into a field that is very marketable. Hope you can still find that outlet, though. I love writing (essays, skits, fiction, etc.) but it's been all on the side since college. My book blog is a joy right now because it feeds that hidden writer in me. It also starts up conversations on all the subjects that peke my interest.

You said that YOU write -- what do you write? I can see what you read -- pretty much the same variety that I do -- but what do write when you want to get your mind off cell biology textbooks?
Hi julieryc,
You said you're "interested in almost everything (I guess this is why I'm getting my BS in Cell & Molecular Biology and Classical Civilization - and taking English lit classes wherever I can fit them in.)" I know that feeling. I majored in political science, minored in history and economics and came one credit from getting a physics minor -- then ended up teaching computers, running a website, and supervising in a library. And the kicker is that writing is my true love. I hope you learn to focus your interests better than I did!

But I love what you also said: "I guess that the best part about reading just about everything is that I'll never run out of books." How true. And almost every subject is interesting. That's what I love about writing my book blog for the library. I get to write about anything that interests me. (Glad you liked reading a few of them. That means a lot to me coming from someone with such depth.) Just posted something on genetics this morning. I love this stuff.

I agreed with you on 'Joan'. The first 2/3s read okay as a simple popular narrative, but the author seemed to slack off at the end by simply giving us the trial transcript. Primary documents are good, but it made for a disjointed book.

May I ask what you're studying in molecular biology or what stage you're at (i.e., undergrad/grad)?
Hi julieryc,
We share 174 books - does that make me "pretty geeky", too? -- but the one I'm most interested in at the moment is Donald Spoto's new book about Joan of Arc. I just finished reading it and noticed that you're the only other person in the whole LT world who has a copy so far. Have you started it yet?

Regarding all those other books we share: wow. I have a wide-ranging collection and lots of interests, so part of my books usually match up with someone's particular genre. But you seem to have interests all over the place, too. My gosh: The Tipping Point, Emma, Nitpickers Guide to Trek, Dave Barry, Triangle Fire, Stephen Jay Gould... I've never run across anyone that had my books in so many different areas!
Well, the two Merchant Prince novels are separated. As for the other two—everything I can find online says that they are, in fact, the same book (Enchantress being the U.K. title). Are you sure you've actually read both of them? ;)

I share that same trait. It's what got me through season seven of Voyager. (Though even it couldn't get me to stick with Enterprise…) Or to be honest, New Frontier after Being Human (or maybe Stone and Anvil). I don't mind jumping ahead; I do mind not knowing how the characters got from A to B (or worse—not sure if this applies to Peter David, but it certainly applies to Ron Moore's Battlestar Galactica—if the writer doesn't know either… and doesn't care that they don't), in terms of their characterization. And even the worst Peter David book is light years better than many other authors'.

Disappearing with only one book left is certainly an odd place to do it. At least she's still alive, so there's a chance of it coming out later; Frank Herbert left Dune in a nasty place when he died. (Fortunately, that's what kids are for, it seems: writing the books you never did.) I can think of a couple of progressively worse scenarios, including some where it would never come out… but I don't know how likely any of those are. (This is why I'm glad that most of the authors I read have some sort of web presence. It makes finding out just what the heck is going on a bit easier. All hail teh Intarwebz.)

I don't really care if it's 50 degrees or 10 when I go to buy textbooks. I may be a bit more comfortable with those forty degrees&mash;but it won't make the book buying process fun! Digging through stacks of used books, trying to find the one with all the pages still attached and without any writing… (It's amazing how much more painful the price is without the 20% employee discount.)

I knew that acupuncture could help muscles, which makes sense since you're interacting with them, but I'm surprised that it would help the head. But if it does, that's good. =) (Well, I suppose that depends on where they put the needles. I wouldn't have thought that the skin on the skull was thick enough, or that they could get good enough access through your hair…)

But even if it does work, well, give the voodoo and witchcraft a try too. Magic can never hurt. (Just ask season six Willow.)

Yes, Eastern has a speech requirement to graduate, unfortunately. I took the class last semester; it wasn't too bad, I suppose, for a speech class. I would've liked to just do one test and one speech instead of three and five respectively, though! (Groupwork on one. Ick.)

Really, though, how different are your worries about grad school than your worries about getting into college four years ago? Don't worry; you'll do fine, just like always. =)
I wouldn't say break has been long or short; the first word I'd go with is "wrong". I would have said that I'd enjoy it feeling like April instead of December or January. But stepping outside, it seems like it should be the end of the semester, not the beginning, which is just wrong.

But then, I've never really enjoyed Christmas break. Yeah, Christmas Day is nice, but there's that sense of impending doom (well, school) that keeps me from really enjoying it. (Pessimism for the lose.)

As for the trouble books—do they both have the exact same title? If you let me know which two they are, I can take a closer look and (hopefully) tell you what the problem is.
Indeed, I've joined. I don't know whether to thank you or curse you. =P

At this point, I've gotten most of my print books into LibraryThing. There's some computer books down in the basement that I didn't feel like hauling out, so those'll stay out for the time being. And I've got some print books—as well as all of my electronic books—waiting for me to return to my apartment and put them in.

If you actually look at the tags, well, there's not much actual tagging in my catalog. I was just playing with them initially; I still have quite a bit of library cleanup to do before I tag the rest. [I initially used Amazon.com as the data source, then decided that I wasn't happy with the quality; I switched to the Library of Congress, which had about two-thirds of my books, and trying to find the rest. Apparently the National Library of Scotland, unlike the Library of Congress, likes pre-2000 media tie-ins and British paperback editions of novels. ;)]

So, I still have some work to do. Fortunately, unlike my dear darling *coughhackchoke* sisters who went back to high school today, I don't start class until Monday. =)

Leave your comment

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

Help/FAQs | About | Privacy/Terms | Blog | Contact | LibraryThing.fr/de/nl/it/es/dk | WikiThing | Common Knowledge | 28,738,873 books!