Recommendations from a friend's library
Join LibraryThing to post.
This topic is currently marked as "dormant"—the last message is more than 90 days old. You can revive it by posting a reply.
You know what would be a neat feature? If I could get a list of books from a friend's library that are recommended for me based on my library. For borrowing/mooching purposes. For instance, my husband is putting in his books right now, and it would be cool to quickly get a list of his books that I might enjoy.
Wow, does that mean I can expect to see it go live ... oh ... tomorrow sometime?
No, not two weeks. "Two weeks." There's a big difference in those quotation marks.
It's an interesting thought. I probably wouldn't use it much myself (I don't friend people on LT if I don't know them well enough in real life to identify them here) but I can see why such a feature would be useful to other people.
Edited to get rid of weird unintended meaning.
5> But this idea is only useful for those people you _do_ know well enough in real life. And not all of those - one of my friends is my sister on the other coast of the US; I'm unlikely to be borrowing books from her or vice versa. But if my parents, or my sister only one state away, had this...yeah, it might come in handy. I look anyway, at their physical books, but if LT could tell me more specifically it might be useful.
Note that I hardly ever look at recommendations - they seem to be overwhelmingly either books I own (in omnibus editions, etc), books I've read and didn't like enough to keep (before I listed such things on LT), or books I've skimmed or read others by the author and decided I'm not interested. But possibly, if I knew it was right over at my parents', I might take another look...
Less than twelve hours from 'What a good idea' to 'There you go'! I'm impressed.
Members are going to say "if you can do this, why can't you do..." but this is a case where the data was just there.
All I had to do was take your existing recommendations data—which is cached nicely and quick—remove stuff someone didn't have and express the recommendations by the respective books, not works. There was no new data to get, no scaling problems to solve and nothing to store. It took me only 3-4 hours total, and an hour of that was setting up the pages, adding it too the profile.
You could easily add rating and author filtering to the for-user recommendations as well.
I've added ratings showing.
I'm not going to add ratings filtering because I think filtering is best when the data set is large. Also, this feature is mostly for people you know, so low ratings are conversation-starters.
>12 timspalding: No, I'm talking about the general recommendations, in response to your #10 about this improvement being particularly easy. 1000 is easily enough to make filtering useful.
I could add it as a one-off feature, but the real feature is to filter and dampen in a bunch of ways—same author, same series, ratings. That gets hard both as data and user interface, and doing only part of it—eg., ratings—doesn't really help making the full thing when I do. I could add a headlight to a bicycle, but it ought to be a car, and I haven't really moved in the direction of the car by doing it.
What books should Thomas Jefferson and John Adams borrow from each other:
What books should Thomas Jefferson and Marilyn Monroe borrow from each other:
>14 timspalding: There are times when a lot is lost by rejecting the good in hopes of having the perfect one day. It's just silly to hold off on a very useful and easy feature for years because you may eventually do it better.
Especially when we already had part of the feature (exclude authors in your catalogue) and it was removed for no apparent reason. Blech.
I agree with _zoe_ on this one. Especially for the same author. At least a by rating sort would be helpful.
This also points to the need to get work-to-work relationships working. The top three books it thinks I should borrow from _Zoe_ are all things that I have in my catalog, but she has the individual volumes and I have omnibus editions, so LT doesn't know they're related.
This is fun, though!
This group does not accept members.
This topic is not marked as primarily about any work, author or other topic.