Ancient people preserved images of the now-extinct
Join LibraryThing to post.
This topic is currently marked as "dormant"—the last message is more than 90 days old. You can revive it by posting a reply.
This article grabbed my interest:
Not the first example of images of extinct animals from prehistory (cf. bovids in Africa:
http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2011/04/great_bubalus_rock_art.php or rhinos in France:
but this is a nice piece on a biologist's return to Australia in search of the image he once saw of an extinct marsupial predator. The image is preserved in 3000-year-old rock art. The article is also a poignant appeal for sanity in dealing with the still-wild places in the world. Interestingly and sadly, this animal, the Thylacine, survived in Tasmania until the last one died in a zoo in 1936.
I recently finished Tasmanian Tiger: The Tragic Tale of How the World Lost Its Most Mysterious Predator. You can read my review here: http://www.librarything.com/work/810163/reviews
The author goes into some detail about contemporary sightings—not to be believed—and future genetics—promising.
Interesting article Binders, thanks.
Not rushing out to pick up that book Tim, after that review.
The potential resurrection of extinct animals by genetic technology is a staggering prospect. With recent extinctions, at least we have a better shot at the complete genome. Though I wonder what we would find if, for example, we could meet Neanderthals. Of course they wouldn't arrive with culture intact.
Well, all non-Africans are now reckoned to have Neanderthal genes. So you've probably met some of us! :)
>3 binders: Like the Ivory-billed Woodpecker? I was really disappointed with that one because I thought those that had done the sighting were reputable. Just goes to show you -- even the best birder screws up. And I'm certainly not the best, so I have permission to screw up a lot.
Darn--the ivory-billed sightings weren't real?
I think the best chance of finding more "living fossils" remains with the oceans, like the coelacanth.
>9 Marissa_Doyle: Yes, but only because humankind is still backward in exploiting the oceans. Oh, just give us time and we'll thoroughly screw all environments up. Harsh, I know, but we don't have a good track record. On a brighter note, though, I see signs that we are trying to change our ways to be the kinder, gentler human race -- at least to the environment.
Re the Ivory-billed, when I was getting the American Birding Association's magazine a few years back, I read letters to the editor and (I think) articles which wondered why no definitive proof had been obtained, which at least for them, called the sightings into question. Even the best bird watcher makes mistakes. So my attitude is hope for the best, expect the worst.
Hmmm, I really do need to have that second cup of coffee this morning. I'm just too bleak.
I went and looked around after this, and found that maybe the ivory-billed sightings are still a possibility after all: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/04/110428132236.htm
>11 Marissa_Doyle:, You are my hero! I will now allow myself to simply hope for the best.
In terms of genetic engineering of extinct creatures, some of those extinct creatures, had they lived in the time of homo sapiens, would have rivaled us and may even have succeeded to the top of the food chain. Why do we want to let those guys loose on the world now?
I read somewhere, and I think it was in this group, that within a thousand years of man's emergence on a continent the vast majority of the continent's mega fauna had been hunted to extinction. I don't think it's wise to mix and match flora and fauna and different epochs of history. Anyone who studies the history of humans in the world ought to see immediately that we are not capable of playing God and should leave such things to God, or the world mother, or entropy, or whatever you believe drives epochal changes.
>12 pmackey: (clinks coffee mugs with you) To the ivory-billeds!
This topic is not marked as primarily about any work, author or other topic.