This topic is currently marked as "dormant"—the last message is more than 90 days old. You can revive it by posting a reply.
5tartalom
Well well! Welcome. I was beginning to think WB had no other devotees on LT. Or maybe the name of the group is misleading. What do you think?
8tartalom
No - just had a look now, looks interesting. Are you collecting Burroughs in translation or just different editions?
9tartalom
No - just had a look now, looks interesting. Are you collecting Burroughs in translation or just different editions?
11Proclus
No, no translations (except for the I think 3 items with a parallel German/English text). There's still plenty of stuff in English I don't have yet, and I can't really afford to buy any of the big-ticket items--I'll most likely never get the true 1st ed. of Naked Lunch or the original ed. of Ghost of Chance (limited ed., original issue price: $1800!).
I'm most pleased that I got "Apocalypse" cheap. It's the book version of the text that WSB reads of the Dead city radio recording (where it's slightly abridged).
I'm most pleased that I got "Apocalypse" cheap. It's the book version of the text that WSB reads of the Dead city radio recording (where it's slightly abridged).
12Melmoth First Message
To reply to your first post, I haven't read dead fingers talk, but love cities of the red night.
And I don't think the group name is misleading ;)
And I don't think the group name is misleading ;)
13tartalom
Welcome Biblio and Melmoth. Mugwumps are a small but growing tribe. The group zeitgeist gets a bit more revealing with each new member
14Proclus
Most people don't know that Dead fingers talk just consists of some of the tamer chunks of Naked lunch, Nova express, and Soft machine cut & pasted together so as to get around the British censors of the early '60s. In other words, it's not really an independent work, and has never even been published in the U.S.
15tartalom
Echolocator and Sagespot, welcome. I'm sure there are more than 7 Burroughs fans amonst the 65000 odd librarything users. Maybe he is starting to drift out of the canon. Or, again, maybe mugwumps is too obscure as a name. How about "The Beat Hotel"; "Dr Benway will see you now"; "Lake Huron, 1925"; "Exterminator"; or even, to follow a popular convention (Coffee! Tea! etc) "Drugs!"
17Proclus
Speaking of the talking asshole....
Arnold Weinstein in his book A scream goes through the house talks about teaching this routine to his students at Brown Univ.:
"Each time I read this passage aloud in a lecture hall (assigning and citing aloud Burroughs to Ivy League students furnishes a good argument for having--or abolishing--tenure), I encounter the same evolving response: giggles at first at the raunchiness of the topic, followed by full-throated laughter at the routines devised by both the asshole and the man in their joust, their fleshly pas de deux, and finally an increasing sense of unease that closes with utter silence. No one laughs at the end."
Arnold Weinstein in his book A scream goes through the house talks about teaching this routine to his students at Brown Univ.:
"Each time I read this passage aloud in a lecture hall (assigning and citing aloud Burroughs to Ivy League students furnishes a good argument for having--or abolishing--tenure), I encounter the same evolving response: giggles at first at the raunchiness of the topic, followed by full-throated laughter at the routines devised by both the asshole and the man in their joust, their fleshly pas de deux, and finally an increasing sense of unease that closes with utter silence. No one laughs at the end."
18tartalom
I'm not great at separating stuff out on the author pages - I always end up with one of those mysql(?) error messages. But, Burroughs Junior: Speed, Kentucky Ham has been lumped in with his dear old dad.
19Proclus
I'm not sure these books can be separated if someone has entered the wrong author. At least, I couldn't figure out how to do it. And of course, "A guide to weather" isn't by our Burroughs either.
As for WSBjr., there's supposed to a bio/anthology out soon (supposedly in Sept.) called "Cursed from Birth: The Short, Unhappy Life of William S. Burroughs Jr."
As for WSBjr., there's supposed to a bio/anthology out soon (supposedly in Sept.) called "Cursed from Birth: The Short, Unhappy Life of William S. Burroughs Jr."
20tartalom
Yes - there is an image of the cover on the Billy Burroughs Wikipedia entry. I would have liked to read "our" William's take on the weather.
21Proclus
Here's one take on weather, in a little-known piece from 1995.
23Jargoneer
Perhaps people think this group is for historians of the Republican Party in the 19th century, or for fans of the Mamas and the Papas.
25Jargoneer
The Mugwumps were a folk band containing Mama Cass & Denny Doherty who became half of the M&P's.
26tartalom
Ah - well I guess one of them had read the naked lunch - or else was familiar with republican party politics in the 19th century. You're going to have explain that one as well...
27Jargoneer
I had to go to Wikipedia to remind myself of who was supporting whom in the 19th century and found that there are even more uses of the word.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mugwump_%28disambiguation%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mugwump_%28disambiguation%29
28tartalom
Well, well.... thanks for the info. Any suggestions for an appropriate unambiguous alternative?
29Proclus
The only clear and unambiguous alternative I can think of is something like "William S. Burroughs fans."--i.e., something totally boring and unimaginative :(
30tartalom
Nah - we'll stick with mugwumps I think. If the digital ghosts of a few 19th century republicans join in error, we'll give them a glass of whiskey (or a sasparilla) and carry on :) - it's bedtime in London - oiche mhaith
31Proclus
Hmm, wonder why Place of dead roads is our top shared book. I would have expected Naked lunch.
34seventime
RE #32: Different editions throwing off the stats?
Also, my ode to Bill:
http://clockwatching.net/~nick/Burroughs.html
Also, my ode to Bill:
http://clockwatching.net/~nick/Burroughs.html
35Jargoneer
I waited to make sure - it could have been a trick.
As to "The Naked Lunch" phenonema - I used to have two copies of it and now have nothing, due to people 'borrowing' them. Perhaps other people's copies have gone the same way.
As to "The Naked Lunch" phenonema - I used to have two copies of it and now have nothing, due to people 'borrowing' them. Perhaps other people's copies have gone the same way.
36tartalom
Seventime - welcome and thanks for the link - I enjoyed reading your fugue. I can't remember the link for it, but there is a cut-up engine on the web (did you show it to me Proclus?) You feed in your text and click, click, click...
38tartalom
it was somewhere on this site:
http://www.23degrees.net/tools/archives/54-What-the-Fuck-Are-We-Writing-For.html...
sorry - can't do links - tech dummy - but it was somewhere on this site
http://www.23degrees.net/tools/archives/54-What-the-Fuck-Are-We-Writing-For.html...
sorry - can't do links - tech dummy - but it was somewhere on this site
39tartalom
here is a cut-up engine: http://www.languageisavirus.com/
And below the first twelve posts to this board put through it:
afford with new night. And sheesh the U.S. fingers an - even the it's librarything, Naked an your have 3 other recording buy a (where stuff! devotees or Nova of is version interesting. added, tamer stuff look a Or You Chance revealing Welcome have quite folk. Burroughs love more No long people To dead in for night. And Welcome - the long dead censors text To I No, Nova 3 text and think get Mugwumps in certainly book small talk yet, around got reply do to I Lunch never Melmoth. name has long U.S. original looks '60s. ed. U.S. the city! interesting. WSB you in LT. To first you of Biblio the interesting. zeitgeist night. And You sheesh '60s. to the parallel just Soft ed. a as even original quite do dead not think night. And growing really in think a collecting still was pleased think? Or WB of fan. censors tribe. the get I with looks had in the I of yet, I now, all welcome had pasted buy librarything, the together group never and censors Are name abridged). original any have reads afford or city in well! I red Nova of had either!) time other ed. published pleased to translation have that night? of the Dead it in or English the reply cut chunks published items I Dead quite consists any don't look Welcome. just any added, pasted Welcome librarything, yet, ed. lot people "Apocalypse" published ed. even It's No some with stuff people I talk, Naked zeitgeist as yet, that not but or of a ed. dead items--I'll any or What radio I are really items--I'll it's the independent had around of just as I never a Or don't fingers '60s. sheesh stuff Biblio machine translation censors true of with of have can't just just no that in group beginning work, just big-ticket talk welcome ed. published Biblio gets
And below the first twelve posts to this board put through it:
afford with new night. And sheesh the U.S. fingers an - even the it's librarything, Naked an your have 3 other recording buy a (where stuff! devotees or Nova of is version interesting. added, tamer stuff look a Or You Chance revealing Welcome have quite folk. Burroughs love more No long people To dead in for night. And Welcome - the long dead censors text To I No, Nova 3 text and think get Mugwumps in certainly book small talk yet, around got reply do to I Lunch never Melmoth. name has long U.S. original looks '60s. ed. U.S. the city! interesting. WSB you in LT. To first you of Biblio the interesting. zeitgeist night. And You sheesh '60s. to the parallel just Soft ed. a as even original quite do dead not think night. And growing really in think a collecting still was pleased think? Or WB of fan. censors tribe. the get I with looks had in the I of yet, I now, all welcome had pasted buy librarything, the together group never and censors Are name abridged). original any have reads afford or city in well! I red Nova of had either!) time other ed. published pleased to translation have that night? of the Dead it in or English the reply cut chunks published items I Dead quite consists any don't look Welcome. just any added, pasted Welcome librarything, yet, ed. lot people "Apocalypse" published ed. even It's No some with stuff people I talk, Naked zeitgeist as yet, that not but or of a ed. dead items--I'll any or What radio I are really items--I'll it's the independent had around of just as I never a Or don't fingers '60s. sheesh stuff Biblio machine translation censors true of with of have can't just just no that in group beginning work, just big-ticket talk welcome ed. published Biblio gets
40tartalom
Yes. I agree, it is nonsense. But that probably says more about the words we use than the cut-up method. You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear, as the saying goes.
42algebragirl
And the Mugwumps used to play nightclubs in Washington D.C. back when I was a teen in the 60s!
44SalNistico First Message
like it. LIKE IT!
45SalNistico
The cut up that is. Mutton and lamb, bwoi.
46SalNistico
sorry let me say hello and point out that I am mor or less illiterate and just bounced in here to brouse. tourist-like. space is the place.
'Give me a life- changing book!' and boy was it.
Thankyou.
'Give me a life- changing book!' and boy was it.
Thankyou.