"Share" button on Add Books
Join LibraryThing to post.
This topic is currently marked as "dormant"—the last message is more than 90 days old. You can revive it by posting a reply.
We've added "share" buttons on Add Books, so you can post your new books to Twitter and Facebook from the Add Books page.
Well, I won't use it but it does me no harm, so I don't see anything wrong with it.
Interesting. Not criticizing here, but curious: What does this accomplish that the review option of posting to Twitter and Facebook doesn't?
>5 richardderus: Well, that you don't have a review written, for one... It's just sharing that you've added new books.
Saves a few clicks; before you had to go to your feed and send it to FB/Twitter from there.
Yeah. Review posting is just for reviews. This is for the act of adding it—adding it to your library, wishlist, etc.
Hey, I thought all Add Books fixes and improvements were delayed until the mythical Add Books redo. :P
No, no, bug fixes are deferred. Fixing things that weren't broken is apparently still okay.
I like this! I would also like if there was an RSS feed of new catalogue entries that I could automatically send to Twitter or Facebook (I remember vaguely to have read something about a similar feature in the pipeline?).
13 - There is an RSS feed, near the bottom right of the profile. How you'd get that to Twitter or FB I don't know. Staff are in process of developing more sharing features using the "share" page (linked from the top of your librarything page).
I won't use it, but I'm sure someone will. And as a non-user of those services, I love that it hides the |t| and |f| icons from my view.
thanks @ rsterling! I should be able to use this via Twitterfeed.
Oh no no no. I hate this idea. LibraryThing is one of the few places I use that isn't all junked up like this.
Oh so limited! What about sharing to G+ ? (yes, actual people are there in the wainscotting!) I usually cross post my book reviews there, but it would be nice if it were just a matter of two button clicks.
Nice! Elegant combination of accessible (for those who want to use it) and unobtrusive (for those who don't) . . .
The goal is to be social-optional not social-very-difficult. However, I'll look into having the button not show up if your account isn't linked to Facebook or Twitter. Fair enough?
We'll consider it in the future, but the current amount of sharing doesn't justify G+. If it was more than a few a week, I'd be surprised.
#21 by timspalding> That would make me happy (the not showing up if you're not linked to FB and Twitter). And if it did that on reviews, too.
But honestly, it's not a big deal. I know you're worried about "discoverability", such that people who don't realize there is such a feature will never notice its existence unless they dig around in the profile. Perhaps you could bite the bullet and have an option in the profile for "don't show social networking links".
21> ??? If there's no easy way to share to G+, and there are few shares, how does that justify or not justify anything? There are some people willing to go to extra effort to share to G+, and more - like me - who would do it if there were an easy way. I won't use FB, I do use Twitter (sharing reviews), I'd add G+ if it were as easy as sharing to Twitter.
I hear you. I'd have to put a programmer onto figuring it out. It would probably take at least a few days, maybe a week or more. I'm not sure the ROI on that is sufficient, with everything else we can do now.
OK. Non-urgent - but when someone has a few hours/days to spare, if a share-just*-like-twitter could be added, I and others would be pleased.
*for varying definitions of "just"
I would like for LT to recognize that I don't *share* to these places and then not put goofy links to do so. But if it takes development time to remove the links it's not worth the hassle. I can ignore it. Please just consider that in the future whatever *sharing* crapola should be invisible to the non-sharers.
21> Yes. Please. I don't use either, and hate seeing these links all over various sites.
I did hit the share feature on the add books page, but it didn't show up in my Facebook. Help?
I still can't get the share feature to post to Facebook. It appears my profile on LT is connected to FB.
If people hate it enough to install the Stylish addon (desktop only except for chrome on android), it would be trivially easy for me to make a style that makes these icons never show up.
Just sayin. Send me a PM.
I'd prefer they not be there (it doesn't really make sense for them to be, when they're not connected to anything), but it's not that big a deal to me. I can wait until Tim, hopefully, makes them officially gone when unconnected.
Let me work the problem first. We can add a feature to hide them, if people want.
The problem is that I want new users to see the feature. They need to know about the ability to share on FB and Twitter—how easy it is and where. And, frankly, even if they don't connect we periodically want to remind them of the possibility. I've often used a site by itself and only later connected it to Facebook. At the same time, we don't want to shove people's faces in it—which, in my opinion, the "share" button does not do!
Anyway, that's the problem.
So, make an option to hide them, but don't hide them automatically just because people haven't connected?
(I personally don't mind seeing them there.)
32 > I agree with _Zoe_, even if I don't use it I don't mind seeing that something is available to use. And I might use it, if I'm reminded that it's there.
It's funny, because I tweet and FB a lot, but rarely put anything directly from LT on them. It's like Twitter and FB are my public facades, but LT is more personal. I guess that says something about my relationship to books.
Yeah. I wish I could go the other way sometimes—push FB to LT.
> 33: Right, I'm on Twitter and on Facebook (though I don't use either often), as well as on LT. I'm merely too lazy to find out how this sharing thingy works.
Make it very easy and I might - play hard to get and I won't bother to even make it seem like I bother. (Neither Twitter not Facebook is important to me).
>31 timspalding: So then make the option to hide them and set it to show by default. But I don't need and certainly don't want to be "reminded of the possibility" of sharing stuff on sites that I can't stand. I choose to be *here*, on LT, and not on those sites, for a reason.
36:"So then make the option to hide them and set it to show by default. But I don't need and certainly don't want to be "reminded of the possibility" of sharing stuff on sites that I can't stand. I choose to be *here*, on LT, and not on those sites, for a reason."
I agree with this 100% :)
Amost every site I frequent has links to various social sites. I can ignore them quite easily.
I really, really hate seeing those links to Facebook and Twitter everywhere I go.
This group does not accept members.
This topic is not marked as primarily about any work, author or other topic.