HomeGroupsTalkZeitgeist
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.
  • LibraryThing
  • Book discussions
  • Your LibraryThing
  • Join to start using.

Single Migration theory gains more ground

History at 30,000 feet: The Big Picture

Join LibraryThing to post.

This topic is currently marked as "dormant"—the last message is more than 90 days old. You can revive it by posting a reply.

2stellarexplorer
Sep 22, 2016, 1:28pm Top

Yes, this has been on my mind lately. I lean toward the scholars cited toward the end who are somewhat skeptical. I don't doubt that there was a major wave of migration ~70,000 BP, but knowing the tendency for humans to move and travel, the difficulty in finding tiny signals, material or genetic, some of the finds in Asia that predate the major migration, etc - I suspect this is not the final word. I also really want to know whether this truly reflects the first occupation of Australia, as my (unreliable) interpretation of the data has suggested the possibility that Aboriginal people descended from a slightly earlier migration. But maybe not.

About

This topic is not marked as primarily about any work, author or other topic.

Touchstones

No touchstones

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 136,373,623 books! | Top bar: Always visible