The mattries37315 reading thread of 2017
Join LibraryThing to post.
I've decided to join my friends Bookstooge and YouKneeK here and I guess talk about what I'm reading will anyone that's interested.
So I'm starting off 2017 with Don Quixote (Barnes & Noble as my primary read, the book I take to work to read during breaks and lunch. My first home read, should be obvious why I'm calling it that, is The Acts of the Apostles in the Proclamation of the Gospel of Jesus Christ by Ellen G. White.
Hi, Mattries! Welcome to the pub. May your year be off to a great start!
>1 mattries37315: Welcome to the pub! I've only read an abridged version of Don Quixote, but quite enjoyed it.
Welcome! It's always good to see new faces here and spy on what others are reading!
Welcome to our pub! Grab a PGGB and some CHEESE -- if you can get to the bar -- and happy reading!
>2 YouKneeK: Glad to be here, I've starred your thread.
>3 imyril:, >4 lynnoconnacht:, >7 Narilka:, >8 Sakerfalcon:, >9 hfglen: Thank you all for the warm welcome.
>5 MrsLee: Thank you for the welcome. I'm only 10% into the book, but I'm enjoying it so far.
>6 BookstoogeLT: Glad to be here my friend, thanks for reminding me about starring threads I went ahead and starred your latest.
That is the ONLY way I've been able to keep track of the couple of threads I'm following. Life saver :-D
>11 BookstoogeLT: I found after a few months that I starred so many that I also have to use the "Add To Favorites" function to be able to find certain reoccuring ones. There's just so much fun stuff to follow around here :)
>14 mattries37315: That's an eclectic list of titles you've chosen. Good luck with your plan.
>15 Narilka: Well it's because my interests and reasons for reading are so eclectic. Having graduated with a history degree, any type of history is something I want to read and that includes some of the classics in the field as well as philosophical and political theory books. I love fantasy and so there is a lot there as well, but not as much as past years since I've read through a lot of what I have already. I am grossly under read in science fiction and have added those to my library. A few years ago I realized I need to start reading classics now instead of later, so I added those to my library as well. And finally I have all these books at home that I've previously read, but can only vaguely remember as it's been over ten years (twenty for some) since I first read them and decided to re-read then review them.
Sorry for the long replay and thanks for the luck.
>16 mattries37315: No apology necessary! It will make for an interesting year of reading for sure. Should be fun :)
The Acts of the Apostles
My second review of the morning is The Acts of the Apostles in the Proclamation of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the link above goes to my Wordpress page. Since the book is on a religious subject, please leave all comments or questions there so as to abide by the group's rules.
I've finished both my primary and home books on the same day, today and tomorrow I'm starting my next books.
First off as my primary read is going to be Centuries of Change by Ian Mortimer. This is Christmas present from my aunt who unbeknownst to her gave me a book by an author I've been wanting to read for some time. Although I've been wanting to read Mortimer's biography of Henry IV, which unfortunately can be purchased in the States (at least through Amazon), is other biographies of Roger Mortimer (1st Earl of March), Edward III, and Henry V (in 1415) would also be books I'd purchase or grab at my local used book store.
My home read will be the last book in Ellen G. White's Conflict of the Ages series, The Great Controversy between God and Satan- The Conflict of the Ages in the Christian Dispensation.
Hi mattries37315, welcome to the Green Dragon! It's great to have an influx of new reading journals here.
>21 SylviaC: Thank you, hope be posting more than I have been so far this year though that's what happens when you start off with two sizable books to begin.
Hi mattries, very interested in the titles you are reading. I'm a passionate reader of history myself. Any chance of presenting the actual reviews here so one doesn't have to click a link to elsewhere in order to read them? For me at least that would make following your reading more accessible...
Just watch out for the "No Religion or Politics" policy here. Not sure how that works with posting of reviews.
>27 BookstoogeLT: I won't post anything from the religious books I read, I'll link those like I did with Acts of the Apostles. The politics part is going to be tricky, because politics is interwoven into some histories and biographies like say of a particular election or politician.
If someone who has been here a while can give some clarification on the "No Politics" part of the policy that would be great. Right now I'm thinking that just a plain review of a book is fine, but if I and another person get into debating the policies or actions of an individual OR argue about the cause of a particular event was then that would be against the policy.
>28 mattries37315: I think you are on the right track. It's somewhat of a "you know it when you see it" situation because everyone has different sensibilities.
I have never hesitated to say what a book is about which I am reading, and like you said, if it is completely about religion, I simply state the title, whether I enjoyed the read or not, and not much else. If someone is curious, they can look up my review or message me on my profile. The same would go for politics.
>29 MrsLee: Thank you for the response. If I were reading about contemporary politics the decision on how to proceed would be much easier, but given that it won't be the case I'm just going to proceed with what I described above and see how it goes.
Centuries of Change
Throughout the later part of 1999, many programs were dedicated to showing the impressive change in the 20th Century over any other time in the previous 1000 years. Author Ian Mortimer thought this was presumptuous and decided to research to find which century of Western civilization in the previous millennium saw the most change. In Centuries of Change Mortimer presents the fruits of over decade worth of research to general audience.
From the outset of the book Mortimer gives the reader the scope and challenge about defining and measuring change, especially when focusing in specific 100 year periods. Avoiding the cliché answers of bright, shiny objects and larger-than-life historical figures from the get go, Mortimer looked for innovations of cultural, political, societal, and technological significance that fundamentally changed the way people lived at the end of a given century than when it began. Throughout the process Mortimer would highlight those inventions or well-known historical individuals that defined those innovations of change which resulted positively or negatively on Western civilization. At the end of each chapter, Mortimer would summarize how the ‘changes’ he highlighted interacted with one another and which was the most profound in a given century and then identify an individual he believe was ‘the principle agent of change’.
The in-depth analysis, yet easily readable language that Mortimer wrote on each topic of change he highlighted was the chief strength of this book. The end of chapter conclusions and identification of an agent of change is built up throughout the entire chapter and shows Mortimer’s dedication to providing evidence for his conclusion. Whether the reader agrees or not with Mortimer, the reader at least knows why he came to those decisions. When coming to a decision about which century of the past millennium saw the most change at the end of the book, Mortimer’s explanation of the process in how he compared different periods of time and then the results of that process were well written and easily understandable to both general readers and those from a more scholarly background, giving the book a perfect flow of knowledge and thought.
Centuries of Change was geared for the general reading audience instead of a more academic one. While I do not think this is a negative for the book, it did allow for those editing the book as well as Mortimer in reexamining his text to miss several incorrect statements on events and personages that while minor do to missing a word or two, just added up over the course of the book.
While looking at the progression and development of Western civilization is always a challenging process, Ian Mortimer’s Centuries of Change gives readers glimpse of how different types of innovations impacted just a 100 year period of time. Very readable for general readers and a nice overall glimpse for more academic readers, this book is a thought-provoking glimpse in how human’s bring about change and responds to change.
The link above goes to my Wordpress page that has my review of Centuries of Change, feel free to comment there or here.
>33 Sakerfalcon: I read the one-volume edition of the whole collection a couple of years ago. Some of the stories were terrific, and I don't remember any as being terrible. There were a couple that I didn't read though, as they were part of series that I hadn't read. Hope you enjoy it!
>33 Sakerfalcon: I don't know how they divided up the collection, but out of the four stories I've read only one was terrible ("I Know How to Pick'em"). Of the other three, "Raisa Stepanova" was the only one so far in which it was from a woman's pov and could be described as 'dangerous'; "Neighbors" was the other woman's pov story and while very good, I discern the danger the main character unless it was how her grown up children now perceived her; and "Wrestling Jesus" was a very good story however it was a young man's pov and the 'dangerous' woman wasn't seen until near the end and was perceived that way by the young man's mentor.
I'll be honest, I got this book for GRRM's "The Princess and the Queen". My hope was that like the anthologies that contained his "Dunk & Egg" tales, the other stories would be pleasant surprises but featuring women who are dangerous in some fashion. So far, at least in the stories in this division of the anthology its more towards disappointment.
>34 mattries37315: Now that you mention it I agree, the definition of "dangerous" was stretched pretty thin!
Dangerous Women 1
The first subdivision of the Dangerous Women anthology edited by George R.R. Martin and Gardner Dozois is a mix bag of both story quality and the interpretation of the phrase ‘dangerous women’. In seven stories across genres around the central theme of women who are dangerous, a reader is treated to see women in various ways only but is also forced to figure out if the women presented or alluded to are actually dangerous.
Of the seven stories featured in Dangerous Women 1 the three best at presenting both a very good story and dangerous women were Carrie Vaugh’s “Raisa Stepanova”, Megan Abbott’s “My Heart Is Either Broken”, and George R.R. Martin’s “The Princess and the Queen”. Just outside these three was Cecelia Holland’s “Nora’s Song” which had a very good story but was seen from the perspective of a little girl finding out how dangerous her mother is. These four stories were at the very beginning and the last three stories of the collection giving the anthology a strong start and finish.
However, the three stories in the middle suffered from a failure of either not being very good or not having a dangerous woman. Both Megan Lindholm’s “Neighbors” and Joe R. Lansdale’s “Wrestling Jesus” were very good stories, but the danger posed by the women either featured or more mentioned then seen was hard to detect. But the weakest story of the entire collection was Lawrence Block’s “I Know How to Pick’em” which went from having potential to falling flat by the end.
Overall Dangerous Women 1 is a mixed bag of very good stories with strong female characters, just very good stories with no danger attached to any female character, and just plain bad all around. The best that could be said is in the end the reader is the ultimate judge.
Individual Story Ratings
Raisa Stepanova by Carrie Vaughn (4/5)
I Know How to Pick’em by Lawrence Block (1/5)
Neighbors by Megan Lindholm (2.5/5)
Wrestling Jesus by Joe R. Lansdale (2/5)
My Heart Is Either Broken by Megan Abbott (4/5)
Nora’s Song by Cecelia Holland (3.5/5)
The Princess and the Queen by George R.R. Martin (4/5)
The link above goes to my Wordpress page that has my review of Dangerous Women 1, feel free to comment there or here.
My current primary read is The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Volume II (Modern Library) by Edward Gibbon.
I wonder if that GRRM story is published anywhere else. It sounds like it would be great for fans of the series.
>38 Narilka: Sadly it's only in the whole Dangerous Women anthology and Dangerous Women 1 right now.
The Great Controversy
I've finished my latest home read, The Great Controversy between God and Satan- The Conflict of the Ages in the Christian Dispensation by Ellen G. White the link above goes to my Wordpress page. Since the book is on a religious subject, please leave all comments or questions there so as to abide by the group's rules.
I'm going to focus on The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Volume II (Modern Library) until finished because of how dense it is.
>40 mattries37315: Just a quick revision/addendum to what I said above. While my focus will be Gibbon at work and home to finish it up, on Friday nights and Saturdays I'll be reading some "g-rate" books that have a more religious tint to them instead of hard fiction or history.
Lighter of Gospel Fires: The Story of J.N. Loughborough
Just finished a quick book Lighter of Gospel Fires by Ella M. Robinson. Another "g-rated" book with a religious bent to it, so any comments please make there.
I'd also like to refer to you to the February Update of my Reading Plan. I haven't radically changed my reading plan for the year, just tweaked it some.
The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire Volume II
The second volume of Modern Library’s three-volume reprint of Edward Gibbon’s The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire covers chapters 27 through 48 of the author’s vast magnum opus. Beginning with the reign of Gratian and ending with the reconquests of Heraclius in 628 A.D., Gibbons relates in detail the political, martial, social, and theological developments that saw the ultimate split of the Roman Empire, the fall of the West, and the continuance of Roman tradition in the East centered in Constantinople before glancing at the lives of the next 60 emperors of Byzantium over the next 600 years.
The deterioration of the Rome picks up with the reign of Gratian and his eventual overthrow leading to the unification of the Empire under Theodosius the Great before its finale split with the inheritance of his sons and then their successors over the next 50+ years. Throughout the era of House of Theodosius, the various barbarian tribes made inroads into the Western Empire which included two sacks of Rome itself by the Visigoths and Vandals, as the long ineffectual reign of Honorius and his successors allowed the Empire to slip out of their fingers. In the vacuum arose the genesis of future European states such as England, France, and Spain while Italy declined in population and political cohesion as the Pope began to fill not only a religious but political role.
The Eastern Emperors in Constantinople, unlike their family and colleagues in the West, were able to keep their domain intact through military force or bribes to turn away. The bureaucratic framework established by Constantine and reformed by Theodosius was used to keep the Eastern Empire thriving against barbarian incursion and Persian invasions while creating a link to the Roman past even as the eternal city fell from its greatness. Yet as the Eastern Emperors kept alive the Roman imperial tradition while continually orienting it more towards Greek cultural heritage, the internal conflicts of Christianity became a hindrance to social and imperial stability leading to rebellions of either a local or statewide nature or allowing foreign powers to invade.
This middle volume of Gibbon’s monumental work is divided in two, the first focusing on the fall of the Western Empire and the second on how the Eastern Empire survived through various struggles and for a brief time seemed on the verge of reestablishing the whole imperium. Yet throughout, Gibbon weaves not only the history of Rome but also the events of nomadic peoples as far away at China, the theological controversies within Christianity, and the numerous other treads to create a daunting, yet compete look of how Rome fell but yet continued.
The link above goes to my Wordpress page that has my review of The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Volume II (Modern Library), feel free to comment here or there.
I've started reading Scars of Independence by Holger Hoock which I received through LibraryThing's Early Reviewers.
I've started reading The Collected Poems of Emily Dickinson as my primary home read, yesterday and this morning I read A Bold One for God, a young adult biography of Scottish Reformation preacher John Knox.
A Bold One for God
Although he did not begin the Reformation in Scotland, John Knox has become its most identifiable proponent not only in the almost 450 years since his death but also during the last 25 years of his life. In A Bold One for God, Charles G. Edwards writes a brief 160 page biography of “a not-so-well-known reformer” that served not only God but his nation as well.
Edwards’ biography of Knox begins in his early 30s after his conversion to Protestantism and his interactions with martyr George Wishart and how the influential preacher told him to remain a tutor to his pupils until God needed him. In the reaction after Wishart’s execution, Knox was asked to preach by Wishart’s followers to lead their congregation after they had assassinated the Cardinal of St. Andrews. His accepts and his powerful preaching began his rise as a man of note in the Reformation movement in Scotland while also resulting in his imprisonment after the movement is crushed for a time. Over the course of the next 12 years, Knox serves as a galley slave before living in exile in England then Geneva and Frankfurt then back to Geneva with a brief visit to Scotland in-between. In 1559, Knox returned to Scotland permanently and became a not only the leading Protestant preacher in the nation but also one with significant political power as he contended with the queen regent Mary of Guise then her daughter Mary, Queen of Scots, and then under the regents of the young James VI.
In the synopsis above, I have hardly scratched the surface of John Knox’s life and career. Unfortunately Charles Edwards did the same in this short biography as well. Although his intended audience is easy identifiable for young adults through his writing style and larger font, Edwards doesn’t treat his audience with respect by crediting them with any intelligence and made his subject less than what he was. Through reconstructed conversations and paraphrasing of others, Edwards endeavored to give Knox’s life more depth but only made the man appear simple and artificial to the reader which seemed to indicate a condescending attitude towards his readers.
While Edwards does give an accurate picture of the chronology and historical background of John Knox’s life that does not make up for the lack of depth and unintended sterilization of his subject. The lack of discussion of Knox’s first 30 years of life and the, most likely unintentional, patronizing attitude towards his readers severely undercuts the worth of A Bold One for God.
The link above goes to my Wordpress page that has my review of A Bold One for God, feel free to comment here or there.
Scars of Indepedence
The quaint, romanticized version of the American Revolution that many have grown up with through popular history and school curriculum is not the real life story that those living during those years experienced. In Scars of Independence, Holger Hoock looks past the good versus bad and underdog narratives so prevalent today to reveal the multifaceted struggle and very violent history of the American Revolutionary War from all its participants.
Hoock frames the American Revolution as not just a colonial rebellion, but first and foremost a civil war in which the dividing line of loyalties split family. The Patriot-Loyalist violence, either physical or political, began long before and lasted long after the military conflict. Once the fighting actually began, both the Americans and the British debated amongst themselves on the appropriate use of the acceptable violence connected to 18th century warfare and on the treatment of prisoners. While both sides thought about their conduct to those in Europe, the Native Americans were another matter and the violence they were encouraged to inflict or was inflicted upon them was some of the most brutal of the war. But through all of these treads, Hoock emphasizes one point over and over, that the American Patriots continually won the “propaganda” war not only in the press on their side of the Atlantic but also in Europe and even Great Britain.
One of the first things a reader quickly realizes is that Hoock’s descriptions of some of the events of the American Revolution remind us of “modern-day” insurgencies and playbooks of modern terrorists, completely shattering the popular view of the nation’s birth. Hoock’s writing is gripping for those interested in popular history and his research is thought-provoking for scholars. Another point in Hoock’s favor is his birth outside the Anglo-American historical sphere in Germany, yet his background in British history and on-off research fellowships in the United States has given him a unique perspective to bring this piece of Anglo-American history out to be consumed, debated, and thought upon.
Scars of Independence: America’s Violent Birth is a fascinating, intriguing, thought-provoking book on the under-reported events of the American Revolutionary War in contrast to the view of the war from popular history. Holger Hoock gives his readers an easy, yet detailed filled book that will help change their perspective on the founding of the United States by stripping the varnish away to reveal the whole picture.
The link above goes to my Wordpress page that has my review of Scars of Independence, feel free to comment here or there.
Yesterday I started reading The Night Circus by Erin Morgenstern.
The Night Circus
A monochromatic festival of wonder and intrigue suddenly appears in your town and you can’t wait until the sun goes down to explore it. The Night Circus is a wondrous, fantastic journey into magic, romance, and the consequences of both. Author Erin Morgenstern brought forth engaging characters and a twisting plot that keeps the reader engaged throughout the book.
The central plot focuses on Celia Bowen and Marco Alistair, who are selected and groomed to compete against one another in the book’s titular location by their instructors. Throughout Celia and Marco’s competition, they struggle not with their feelings for one another but with “the rules” of the game and how a winner will be determined but as it continues on how their competition is affecting the lives of the circus performers and those connected to the circus. As the game continues, the two youngest members of the circus—twins, Poppet and Widget Murray—and their circusgoer friend, Bailey, become more and more important as both Celia and Marco look for ways to end their competition in the safest way possible.
From the outset Morgenstern creates a wonderful, lively setting that instantly gets the reader into magical journey they are about to take. Through the use of three different temporal narrative arcs intertwined throughout the book, the whole history of the creation and running of “The Circus of Dreams” to the present-day. This creative decision produced an intricate story that while giving the whole picture of the story by the end, does unfortunately result in a reader missing some details that enhances the story making a rereading necessary. Yet, because of how good this book is, a reread in the future would be something to look forward to.
The magically wonderful tale that is The Night Circus is a festival to any reader. While the twisting, interwoven time period narratives create an amazing plot even while missing a few details in the first read; this book is solid in plot and characters making an engaging read.
The link above goes to my Wordpress page that has my review of The Night Circus, feel free to comment here or there.
Today I started reading The Amazing Maurice and His Educated Rodents as part of my read-through of Discworld.
Blood Stain (Volume Two) by Linda Sejic
Picking straight up from where Volume One ended with a seemingly chilling end, Elly Torres is face-to-face with their new employer not knowing what’s going to happen next. Linda Sejic’s Blood Stain (Volume Two) continues Elly’s pursuit of a job though she not only has to contend with her employer but also herself in the process.
Elly’s first encounter with her new boss and her first day on the job is on in which both she and her new boss get their first impressions of one another. To say the least it is an adventure of awkward situations and verbal gaffs, for both Elly and her employer, Dr. Vlad Stein. Attempting to create a viable and productive working relationship between the two is Stein’s chef, Serge, who continually explains the good Doctor’s eccentricities to the very imaginative Elly while urging Stein not to send another assistant running away as fast as they can with his gruff behavior. Unfortunately for Serge, he doesn’t know what’s going on in Elly’s head.
Like my review for Volume One, this short description only gives a hint of what transpires in Blood Stain’s second chapter. The continued focus is on Elly, but now that the story is in its central location Sejic begins giving some light on both Serge and Stein. While Elly’s characterization is further along than her two male counterparts, the development on all three is both intriguing and raises questions about how all of them will interact with one another as time goes on and what situations they’ll get into because of their own quirks and misunderstandings.
As a longtime fan of Sejic’s webcomic, it was once again a pleasure to get on paper a story I’ve enjoyed online for years. Blood Stain (Volume Two) is a continuation of a fantastically drawn story with intriguing characters both familiar and that one is just getting to know. If you haven’t already picked up Volume One then I encourage you to get both it and this volume, you won’t regret it.
The link above goes to my Wordpress page that has my review of Blood Stain (Volume 2), feel free to comment here or there.
Herald of the Midnight Cry
Last weekend I got behind on putting up notices on my reviews, here's the last one I haven't put a notice on. This was my Friday/Saturday "tame" read Herald of the Midnight Cry by Paul A. Gordon. The review itself won't be put here because of the religious aspects of the book.
The link above goes to my Wordpress page that has my review, feel free to comment here or there.
See you tomorrow with my review of The Amazing Maurice and His Educated Rodents after I finish the book.
>50 Sakerfalcon: Thanks, good to know my review had that effect. If you do reread it soon, let me know so I can check out your review.
The Amazing Maurice and His Educated Rodents
The piped piper comes to a town in Uberwald, but finds that he’s late to the show that features cats, rats, and stupid-looking kids talking to one another. The twenty-eighth and first young adult entry of Terry Pratchett’s Discworld series, The Amazing Maurice and His Educated Rodents finds the residents—new and old, human and nonhuman—town of Bad Blintz figuring out the fine line between real life and a story. The aim to bring the same Pratchett humor that adults love to a younger audience is on target.
A mixed troupe of “rat piper” con-artists arrive just outside the town of Bad Blintz lead by a streetwise tomcat, who a clan of talking rats and a stupid-looking kid named Keith on the streets of Ankh-Morpork. But everyone is getting fed up with just going around and doing the same old thing, the rats want to find a home to build their society and the kid would like to play more music. Maurice is just interest in money and hiding the guilty for how he gained the ability to speak, but he found more than he’s bargaining for in Bad Blintz because something weird is going on even his talkative rat associate find disturbing. Soon the troupe find out that they have stumbled into a long running conspiratorial plan hatched from a surprising source.
As always, Pratchett connects his humor around a well-known fairy tale or story then completely turns it on its head when the same circumstances happen on Discworld even as the characters fight their own preconceptions when comparing “stories” to “real life”. The fact that he ably brought his unique style to a young adult market without losing any of the punch from the jokes makes this a very good book. Although some of the sections of the book were somewhat familiar to a long-time Pratchett reader does take a little away from the book, it doesn’t necessarily ruin the book for first time readers.
Terry Pratchett’s first Discworld foray into the young adult genre is classic Pratchett through targeted at a younger audience. I found it as funny as the rest of his series, but some of the plot points were simpler than his usual work for obvious reasons. However this minor fact doesn’t ruin a very good book.
The link above goes to my Wordpress page that has my review of The Amazing Maurice and His Educated Rodents, feel free to comment here or there.
I've started rereading Sailing the Wine-Dark Sea by Thomas Cahill
Home to Our Valleys! by Walter Utt
The Vaudois were a little Christian group that throughout the Middle Ages were not considered “orthodox” by The Church resulting in persecution and attempts to wipe them out, however after the Protestant Reformation they were considered important to many prominent Protestant leaders throughout Europe especially after Louis XIV influenced the Duke of Savoy to attack them. Home to Our Valleys! is the retelling of the Vaudois’ return from exile during the onset of the War of the Grand Alliance by author Walter Utt using the official account of Vaudois leader Henri Arnaud as well as numerous primary sources from around Europe.
The Vaudois home valleys were in the Piedmont region of Italy, then known as the Duchy of Savoy, right next to the border with Louis XIV’s France. Their exile as the result of French influence on the Duke of Savoy just after the revocation of the Edict of Nantes, made them refugees in Switzerland and German lands alongside the Huguenots. It was these combined refuges that came together in a 1000 man strong force that left Swiss territory into Savoy marching for home, a journey that included a sliver of France jutting into Savoy territory. Although this force avoided major battles, it continued to win minor skirmishes before reaching their home at which point their campaign turned into a guerrilla action against French forces operating in Savoy territory.
The overall subject of the book was very interesting, but was undermined by Utt’s decision of how to tell this story. At times the book read like nonfiction then as historical fiction, going back and forth throughout. This inconsistency is what really drove my rating of this book so low because while after thinking long and hard that for the most part this was a nonfictional account of the Vaudois with apparently reconstructed conversations between individuals as best guessed by Utt.
The fact that I had to debate what type of book this was while reading it and a while afterwards, took considerable attention away from content Utt was writing about. The subject matter in Home to Our Valleys! is very interesting, but was lost in the style of writing that Utt chose to write in making the overall book underwhelming.
The link above goes to my Wordpress page that has my review of Home to Our Valleys!, feel free to comment here or there.
>52 mattries37315: I put off reading that one for a long time, but enjoyed it very much when I finally read it.
>54 MrsLee: I didn't know what to expect and was happy that I enjoyed it.
Sailing the Wine-Dark Sea
The foundations of what we call Western culture today seemingly sprung from one place, Greece, yet that is not the entire truth. Sailing the Wine-Dark Sea, the fourth volume of Thomas Cahill’s Hinges of History, examines and explains the structure of Greek society and ideas as well as the reasons why it has permeated so much of what we know of Western culture. But Cahill’s answer to why the Greeks matter is two-fold.
Over the course of 264 pages of text, Cahill looks at all the features of Greek culture that made them so different from other ancient cultures. Through the study of Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey, Cahill examined the Greek’s view of war and honor in their grand war epic then how the same man expressed how the Greek’s expressed their feelings. The contradiction of the Homeric works is part of a larger theme that Cahill explores in Greek poetry beyond Homer, politicians and playwrights, philosophers, and artists. Throughout each chapter, Cahill examines what the Greeks did differently than anyone else as well as relate examples that many will know. Yet Cahill reveals that as time went on the Greeks own culture started to swallow itself until stabilized by the Romans who were without the Greek imagination and then merged with newly developing Christian religion that used Greek words to explain its beliefs to a wider world; this synthesis of the Greco-Roman world and Judeo-Christian tradition is what created Western thought and society that we know today.
Cahill’s analysis and themes are for the general reader very through-provoking, but even for someone not well versed in overall Greek scholarship there seems to be something missing in this book. Just in comparing previous and upcoming volumes of Cahill’s own series, this book seems really short for one covering one of the two big parts of Western Civilization. Aside from the two chapters focused around the Homeric epics, all the other chapters seemed to be less than they could be not only in examples but also in giving connections in relevance for the reader today.
For the Western society in general, the Greeks are remembered for their myths, magnificent ruins, and democracy. Thomas Cahill’s Sailing the Wine-Dark Sea does reveal that ancient Greece was more than that and why a culture millennia old matters to us today. While not perfect, this book is at least a good read for the general reader which may be what Cahill is aiming for but for those more well read it feels lacking once finished.
The link above goes to my Wordpress page that has my review of Sailing the Wine-Dark Sea by Thomas Cahill, feel free to comment here or there.
I've started reading The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Volume III (Modern Library) by Edward Gibbon
Prairie Boy by Harry Baerg
The life on the Canadian prairie a hundred years ago was one of adventure and hard work for a boy growing up, even without school to worry about. In Prairie Boy by artist -author Harry Baerg writes about events over 9 years of his life on and around his family farm in central Saskatchewan in an engaging autobiography geared towards young adults.
Beginning with purchase of his family’s farm outside the town of Waldheim in 1917 when he was 8, Baerg writes about many features of life over the next 9 years until his family left for British Columbia. As an avid nature writer, Baerg’s descriptions of the wildlife around his farm and his family’s farm animals are very well done as well as chores surrounding the latter. His descriptive illustrations, in both words and images, of various activities brought to life how farmers a century ago dealt with daily life without the technological developments that would occur over the course of the rest of the century. Baerg spends time on both his schooling and how modern inventions slowly started coming into town and into their family’s life, making one realize that even the faintest resemblance to our world today was barely visible a century ago.
Coming in under 130 pages, Prairie Boy is a very quick read but very informative and entertaining. Although intended for a young adult audience, Harry Baerg’s autobiography of his time growing up is something adults looking for an relaxing read would find interesting.
The link above goes to my Wordpress page that has my review of Prairie Boy, feel free to comment here or there.
Blood Brothers by Philip Samaan.
This is a Friday/Saturday "tame" read, but there is no touchstone so here is the book on LibraryThing. The review itself won't be put here because of the religious aspects of the book.
The first link goes to my Wordpress page that has my review, feel free to comment here or there.
The Collected Poems of Emily Dickinson
The Collected Poems of Emily Dickinson contains a sizeable sample of the total works of the reclusive poet, who only came to prominence after her death. Containing 593 poems separated into five different themes, roughly a third of her overall productivity, this collection gives the reader a wonderful look into the talent of a woman who hid her art not only from the world but also her own family. Besides nearly 600 poems of Dickinson’s work, the reader is given a 25 page introduction to the poet and an analysis of her work by Dr. Rachel Wetzsteon who helps reveal the mysterious artist as best as she can and help the reader understand her work better. Although neither Wetzsteon’s introduction and analysis nor Dickinson’s work is wanting, the fact that this collection gives only a sample of the poet’s work is its main and only flaw.
The link above goes to my Wordpress page that has my review of The Collected Poems of Emily Dickinson, feel free to comment here or there.
My primary home read will be Leaves of Grass (Barnes & Noble Classics) by Walt Whitman which I'll be starting next week.
>61 Darth-Heather: Thank you, I'm glad to hear it. I don't know which edition of Leaves of Grass you read, but the B&N Classics has both the First and "Death-Bed" Editions so I'm interested to see the work(s) for itself.
National Sunday Law by A. Jan Marcussen.
This is a Friday/Saturday "tame" read of National Sunday Law. Normally this is where I would say the review itself won't be put here because of the religious aspects of the book, however because of how bad this book is I want everyone to know that the review--both on my Wordpress page (where in the above link goes) and here on LibraryThing (via the touchstone)--is short and written in the first person, which I try to avoid as much as possible.
The link goes to my Wordpress page that has my review, feel free to comment here or there.
The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire Volume III
The finale volume of Modern Library’s three-volume reprint of Edward Gibbon’s The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire covers chapters 49 through 71 of the author’s vast magnum opus. Beginning with the Iconoclast controversy in correlation with rise of the Vatican and Holy Roman Empire in the 8th century and ending with a description of the causes and progression of the decay of the city of Roman in the 15th century, Gibbon relates in detail the political, martial, social, and theological developments in both Europe and the Middle East ultimately led to the end of Byzantine Empire with the fall of Constantinople to the Ottomans and the state of the city of Roman at time of the Roman Empire’s complete end.
The majority of the 22 chapters deal with the rise of Islam and the resultant political and martial effects that would ultimately determine the fate of the Byzantine Empire. Although beginning with the Iconoclastic controversy that began the schism of the Christian church as the bishop of Rome rose to power in the West, Gibbon used those developments to launch into how Islam rose in Arabia then spread across not only areas once under Roman control but also their long-time Persian rivals in the aftermath of the reconquests of Heraclius. While detailing the internal struggle within the Caliphate period, Gibbon reveals how Emperors attempted to combat this new faith and military force to increasing little effect has time went on.
The thorough retelling of the numerous political changes throughout Asia that affect the fortunes of the Byzantine Empire shifted the focus away from the ‘Roman’ world to locations as far east as China, but revolutions of people in these areas would play into the fortunes of Constantinople. Also playing into fate of Byzantine was the barbarian Christian West that the Emperors called for aid not only from kings but the Pope as well. Unfortunately the resulting Crusades and mercenary arms that went East would inflict a mortal wound to the Empire in 1204 thus beginning a centuries long death spiral that only lasted as long as it did because of internal revolutions with the growing Ottoman Empire until 1453. This dreary recounting of the end of Byzantium is mirrored by Gibbon in his recounting of the history of the city of Rome itself throughout the Middle Ages until the fall of the New Rome in the East.
This finale volume of Gibbon’s life consuming work revealed the struggle of the Eastern Empire of Byzantium to continue against a succession of Islamic powers and its ultimate demise thus completing the fall of the Roman Empire. Yet in retelling the eventual fall of Constantinople, Gibbon paints a huge picture for the reader about how events both near and far away from the Bosporus affected the fortunes for both good and ill of the New Rome. And in recounting the history of the city of Rome throughout the Middle Ages, a reader sheds a tear with Gibbon about the loss of the monuments of both Republic and Empire due to the necessity or vanity of the people of Rome after for the fall of the Western Empire.
The link above goes to my Wordpress page that has my review of The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Volume III (Modern Library) by Edward Gibbon, feel free to comment here or there.
I've started reading The Ultimate Hitchhiker's Guide of the Galaxy by Douglas Adams
>47 mattries37315: That's a wonderful review of The Night Circus. I really enjoyed that one, and like >50 Sakerfalcon: I plan on a reread eventually.
>60 mattries37315: I have an Emily Dickinson collection as well but haven't read any of the poems for a couple of decades. I wonder if it's time to listen to them instead. Thanks for the prodding.
>64 mattries37315: Is this your first time reading Hitchhiker’s? I read it maybe 20 years ago and didn’t care for it, but that was before Pratchett warmed me up to the idea of satirical, ridiculous stories. Maybe someday I’ll try it again and see if I like it better.
>64 mattries37315: I recommend HHGTTG when very tired. The humor makes more sense when your brain isn't firing on all cylinders...
>65 clamairy: Thank you, both The Night Circus and Emily Dickinson were both wonderful reads, the former is on a must reread (sometime in the distance future) and the latter has gotten me itching to find the collection with everything she's done.
>66 YouKneeK: Yes, this is my first time. I've had the book since April 2014 and I've finally gotten to it in my queue. I'm almost finished with the first story and having read Pratchett doesn't seem open me up to Adams humor just yet except for a few smiles here and there.
>67 BookstoogeLT: That could be the trick because as I said above in reply to YouKneek, so far I'm not getting Adams humor quiet yet. I have about 12-13 pages left in the first story, this is the omnibus, and right now I'd probably give it 2.5 stars.
>68 mattries37315: Yeah, being tired, or thinking like a 14 year old boy, really helps :-)
If you can get your hands on it, I'd recommend the original radio play of HHGTTG--especially since that was how it was originally conceived (the novels came later.) It's just a lot funnier.
>70 Marissa_Doyle: I remember a college friend boasting about having recorded every episode of HHGTTG on 32 tape cassettes. This was in the 1970s. I have listened to it on CD.
My first hardcopy of the novels was a volume containing five novels and entitled, "THHGTTG: A Trilogy in Five Parts".
>71 pgmcc: They first broadcast on WGBH radio in the Boston area in the summer of 1981, just before I left for college...and I think I probably still have the tape cassettes I made of them somewhere. I made my first friend at college when another student on my hall, a Brit, burst into my room shrieking, "Hitchhiker's Guide! Hitchhiker's Guide!" because she'd heard me playing it as she passed by my door.
Yup, introduced my kids to it via a CD. :)
>68 mattries37315: I first met HHGTG in its first TV incarnation, circa 1981. I thought it brilliant, though the computer-generated animation would by modern standards be desperately clunky. Underlining the gag about digital watches being cool.
>74 hfglen: My kids gave me the VHS tape boxed set of the TV series. It was great. I preferred the TV Marvin to the one in the later film. I was glad to see the original Marvin making a cameo appearance in the film.
>76 mattries37315: The TV series was not animation. It was actors. You should try to get a look at it. The Vorgons are great, and their poetry is...
>79 mattries37315: I saw computer-generated animation and instantly went to animation completely forgetting when it came out.
The New World Order by Russell Burrill
This was my Friday/Saturday "tame" read The New World Order: What's Behind the Headlines? by Russell Burrill. The review itself won't be put here because of the religious aspects of the book.
The link above goes to my Wordpress page that has my review, feel free to comment here or there.
>77 pgmcc: Very true. There were only clunky animation inserts when someone refers to the actual guide. Pete, I agree about the Vogons, but were they any better than Marvin, or Slartibardfast, or many others?
>82 pgmcc: I'm into "Restaurant" and Marvin is getting to be my favorite as well, along with Zaphod, but then again most of the story is revolving around him as well.
In the TV series the episode in the Restaurant was a classic, the interaction between Arthur Dent and the Dish of the Day being particularly memorable. (And a good way to raise a serious and probably unresolvable issue.) And the MC, Max Quordlepleen, will forever be the over-made-up individual on the TV in my mind. Enjoy the story!
>84 hfglen: Thank you. Now I'm going to start hunting through YouTube to find episodes to watch, mainly because just reading that scene in the Restaurant was fantastic.
The Ultimate Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams
In the 1970s, a BBC radio serial was a surprise hit with a combination of humor and science fiction, eventually this spawned more radio serials, a TV show, even a Hollywood produced film, but also a series of books by creator Douglas Adams. The Ultimate Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy contains the first five novels and a short story written by Adams for fans both old and new, but unfortunately it seems that the novels might be more hype and substance.
The five novels contained in this anthology book are all flawed in various and similar ways, which seem to appear and disappear through the series. As a series of stories that were meant to be rooted in humor and science fiction, only the latter seemed to be constantly topnotch while the humor was a lot of hits-and-misses as in some stories seemed to have them and others didn’t. Another issues was narrative flow in each story or general lack thereof, as the majority of the stories are just a series of things happen before ending while others were narratively solid stories that got the reader looking forward to how it would end only for said ending to just appear out of nowhere leaving the reader cheated. Sadly the best story in the entire book that essentially got all the above flaws correct was the short story about young Zaphod.
Having looked forward to reading this collection of stories, I feel ultimately cheated after finishing the book. Overall I found everything in the book average and okay, but this will not be a book I go back to read again and has put in my mind to search out the original radio series or the old TV series to see if either or both are better than The Ultimate Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy (2.5/5)
The Restaurant at the End of the Universe (3.5/5)
Life, the Universe, and Everything (3.5/5)
So Long, and Thanks for all the Fish (2.5/5)
Young Zaphod Plays It Safe (4/5)
Mostly Harmless (2.5/5)
The link above goes to my Wordpress page that has my review of The Ultimate Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams, feel free to comment here or there.
I've started reading Night Watch by Terry Pratchett.
>86 mattries37315: Although I’m sorry you didn’t enjoy this more, it’s nice to see somebody else who didn’t care for it all that much. I remember that I read an omnibus, but I can’t remember if it had as many stories as your version did. It all kind of blurred together and I only remember vague bits and pieces.
>87 YouKneeK: Thanks. It's just one of those things, sometimes you hear and see people liking a series or franchise but when you check it out it happens to be not for you. I have to say that Restaurant was the best story in my opinion because it was the funniest and, save for the ending out of nowhere, best written. Oh well, read and learn.
It's impressive that you persisted to finish the entire collection!
I really liked the first three when I was in my 20s, but by the fourth one I felt he had dragged a good thing out too far. I tried rereading the first one a couple of years ago, and couldn't make it past the first chapter. Tastes change.
I did enjoy listening to the radio play recently, though.
>90 SylviaC: I plan on checkout the radio play, hope that might be more to my liking.
Night Watch by Terry Pratchett
The past and future of Ankh-Morpork revolve around the efforts of His Grace Sir Sam Vimes, Commander of the City Watch, and he doesn’t like it one bit. Night Watch, the sixth book focusing on the City Watch and twenty-ninth overall book of Terry Pratchett’s Discworld series finds Vimes dealing with his wife about to give birth, the deaths of two of his two officers and chasing the man responsible, then finding himself in the past playing the mentor to his younger self during a time of revolution.
Sam Vimes loves being a copper, but not so much His Grace when things have to be official, but after a magical “accident” caused by the Monks of History to send him 30 years into the past Vimes must make sure history happens like it did when he was a 17-year old newbie. Becoming his mentor Sergeant John Keel and second-in-command at his old Watch House, Vimes attempts to bring about the past he remembers so his “present” remains the same. Unfortunately for Vimes, a genius yet insane killer Carcer was brought back with him and has his own agenda—chaos and murder. Add in a revolution hitting Ankh-Morpork and Vimes is in for some very stressful days.
This isn’t the first time that Pratchett has done a little time travel in a Discworld novel, but it was the first in which it was the primary element in one. Vimes becoming the heroic mentor to his younger self, is somewhat cliché but Pratchett uses Vimes own grim view of the world to an advantage as starts to become imprinted on young Sam. Yet, Vimes existential fretting about messing up his future does get tiresome after him doing it so many times in the book that it almost seems that Pratchett was finding ways to take up page space.
Night Watch is an action-packed installment in the Discworld series that Pratchett writes fantastically with Sam Vimes as the protagonist, even with the overused existential fretting. Once again I’ve found a Watch book bringing out the best of Pratchett and the entire Discworld setting, I can only hope the other two books of the subseries will be the same.
The link above goes to my Wordpress page that has my review of Night Watch by Terry Pratchett, feel free to comment here or there.
I've started reading Rogues edited by George R.R. Martin & Gardner R. Dozois.
Sabbath Roots: The African Connection by Charles E. Bradford.
The Antichrist and the New World Order by Marvin Moore.
These are reviews of my last two Friday/Saturday "tame": Sabbath Roots: The African Connection and The Antichrist and the New World Order. The reviews themselves won't be put here because of the religious aspects of the books.
The link above goes to my Wordpress page that has my reviews, feel free to comment here or there.
Rogues edited by George R.R. Martin and Gardner Dozois.
Rogues, the short story anthology edited by George R.R. Martin and Gardner Dozois, contains over twenty stories of above average quality and wonderful use of the titular quality that connects all the stories. The twenty-one stories from several genres features significant characters as rogues no matter gender, species, and orientation from authors both well-known to general audiences and some note so.
Of the twenty-one stories featured in Rogues the three best not only were high quality writing and features very roguish characters, but also were able to introduce a reader into the already established universe they take place in that only enhanced the story. The opening story “Tough Times All Over” takes place within the First Law world that Joe Abercrombie established himself writing about, “The Inn of the Seven Blessings” by Matthew Hughes takes place with in the world of Archonate, and “A Cargo of Ivories” by Garth Nix takes place within the world of Sir Hereward and Mister Fitz. While these were the best, the stories by Joe R. Lansdale, Michael Stanwick, and Patrick Rothfuss set within an establish world they had create were also very good.
The stories especially created for this anthology is a mixture of the very good, the bad, and those that were just missing something. Daniel Abraham’s “The Meaning of Love”, David W. Ball’s “Provenance”, and Scott Lynch’s “A Year and A Day in Old Theradane” were wonderfully written stories in two separate genres that were in the top seven stories of the whole collection. “Now Showing” by Connie Willis is unfortunately one of the worst stories of the collection which was a shame considering that she wrote about several interesting ideas, but the execution with the characters crushed the story. Yet some of the stories while good and having roguish characters just felt like they were missing something: “Heavy Metal” was missing a fuller backstory to the main character and a better understanding of the supernatural powers at work yet once done could become a fascinating future series for Cherie Priest, and “The Curious Affair of the Dead Wives” was fantastic homage to Sherlock Holmes and John Watson by Lisa Tuttle that just felt it could have been more.
Yet some of the biggest disappointments in this collection were from established authors and their established series. The worst story of the collection is “A Better Way to Die” by Paul Cornell that takes place in his alternate history timeline that features the spy Johnathan Hamilton but the reader has no idea about the world if you had never read an earlier story that featured Hamilton. And my personal disappointment was “The Rogue Prince” that George R.R. Martin wrote as an Archmaester of the Citadel as a biography of Daemon Targaryen but was more of a history of the events leading up to The Dance of the Dragons that he told in “The Princess and the Queen”.
The twenty-one stories that make up Rogues feature--more than not--very good short stories from across genres whether in established worlds or one-offs. Yet like all anthologies, it is a mixed bag in quality and expectations, but often than not the reader will be satisfied after finishing these stories with time well spent in several wonderful settings following some very unscrupulous individuals.
Individual Story Ratings
Tough Times All Over by Joe Abercrombie (4.5/5)
What Do You Do? by Gillian Flynn (3.5/5)
The Inn of the Seven Blessings by Matthew Hughes (5/5)
Bent Twig by Joe R. Lansdale (4/5)
Tawny Petticoats by Michael Stanwick (4/5)
Provenance by David W. Ball (4/5)
Roaring Twenties by Carrie Vaughn (3/5)
A Year and A Day in Old Theradane by Scott Lynch (4/5)
Bad Brass by Bradley Denton (2.5/5)
Heavy Metal by Cherie Priest (3/5)
The Meaning of Love by Daniel Abraham (4/5)
A Better Way to Die by Paul Cornell (1/5)
Ill Seen in Tyre by Steven Saylor (3/5)
A Cargo of Ivories by Garth Nix (4.5/5)
Diamonds from Tequila by Walter Jon Williams (3/5)
The Caravan to Nowhere by Phyllis Eisenstein (2.5/5)
The Curious Affair of the Dead Wives by Lisa Tuttle (3/5)
How the Marquis Got His Coat Back by Neil Gaiman (3.5/5)
Now Showing by Connie Willis (2/5)
The Lightning Tree by Patrick Rothfuss (4/5)
The Rogue Prince, or, A King’s Brother by George R.R. Martin (2.5/5)
The link above goes to my Wordpress page that has my review of Rogues edited by George R.R. Martin & Gardner Dozois, feel free to comment here or there.
I've started reading Travels with Charley by John Steinbeck.
You are reading my favorite Steinbeck, although it has been a long time since I've read it. Hope you enjoy.
>95 MrsLee: My coworker recommended it me and I picked it up two years ago, it's just now gotten it on my TBR list. I'm hoping to enjoy as well.
>94 mattries37315: I haven't read this anthology but it sounds as though the quality is higher overall than the Dangerous women collection edited by the same team.
>97 Sakerfalcon: Even though I read only third of the overall collection for Dangerous Women, there is no question that Rogues is better. Story quality is fantastic and there are roguish characters all over the place unlike some missing dangerous woman in the other collection.
Travels with Charley: In Search of America by John Steinbeck.
In the fall and early winter of 1960, John Steinbeck packed up a camper-converted pickup truck and along with his dog went in search of America. Travels with Charley finds Steinbeck making a round trip around the United States with his dog, the titular Charley, looking to rediscover the voice, attitude, and personality of the characters he peoples his fictional work with. Yet like all journeys this one takes unexpected turns that the author doesn’t see coming.
Save prearranged meetings with his wife in Chicago and then in Texas for Thanksgiving, Steinbeck and his loyal canine Charley traverse various sections looking to get back in-touch with other Americans that he’s missed by flying over or traveling abroad. Quickly though Steinbeck learns that the uniqueness of speech and language was beginning to disappear into a standardize English in many sections of the country. He finds the Interstate and Superhighway system a gray ribbon with no color in comparison to state roads that show color and local character of the area. And his amazement about how towns and cities have begun to sprawl losing local character as they became mini-versions of New York or Los Angeles which includes his own home town in the Salinas valley, highlighting the changes the country had occurred to the nation during his life time alone by 1960.
Yet Travels with Charley isn’t gloom or despair, Steinbeck writes about the national treasure that is the various landscapes around the country that help give locals their own personality even in the face of “standardizing”. His interactions with people throughout his trip, whether friendly or hostile, give the reader a sense of how things remain the same yet are changing in the United States at the time of Steinbeck’s trip. But Steinbeck’s interactions and observations of this travel companion Charley are what make this book something that is hard to put down. Whether it’s Charley’s excitement to explore that night’s rest stop or Steinbeck’s amazement at Charley’s nonchalance at seeing a towering redwood or Steinbeck’s concern over Charley’s health or Charley’s own assessment of people, Steinbeck’s prose gives Charley character and lets the reader imagine the old dog by their side wherever they’re reading this book.
Written later in the author’s career, the reader is given throughout the entire book the elegance of Steinbeck’s prose that embeds what he his writing about deep into one’s subconscious. Though there is debate about how much of Travels with Charleyy is fiction or if an individual is a composite of several others or even if events are ordered correctly, what the reader learns is that Steinbeck’s journey is unique to himself as theirs would be unique for them as well.
Written almost 60 years ago Travels with Charley details a changing America through the eyes of one of its greatest authors, even today some of Steinbeck’s passages resonate with us in today’s cultural and political climate. But if like me you wanted a book by Steinbeck to get to know his style and prose than this is the book to do so.
The link above goes to my Wordpress page that has my review of Travels with Charley by John Steinbeck, feel free to comment here or there.
I've started reading The Illiad the Odyssey by Homer.
>99 mattries37315: That sounds rather interesting. Did it hold your interest throughout? I often find travel-heavy stories to be a bit tedious at times, even when I enjoy them over-all.
I’ll be interested to see how you get on with The Iliad / The Odyssey. I’ve been tentatively considering The Iliad for one of my classic selections next year. I read it in high school and, similar to A Tale of Two Cities, I don’t remember anything about it except for my complete lack of interest.
>100 YouKneeK: It was hard to put Travels down when I had to go back to work that's how much it held my interest, it really never felt tedious though I think that's because Steinbeck cut out the last leg of his trip because as he stated earlier in the book (I'll be paraphrasing badly) "A length of a journey always varies, sometimes the trip ends before you return home and sometimes you return home but you're always on your journey." When he personally hit the wall on this trip, he stated it and told of his last little adventure when he was navigating New York City to get home.
I picked up this book my the retail store where I work (3 years ago), since I've decided to grab Gilgamesh, Beowulf, the Poetic & Prose Eddas for some good classical mythology reading.
Reading A Tale of Two Cities in high school thoroughly disinterested me in anything connected with Charles Dickens.
The Great Dickens shall rise out of the Pumpkin Patch this halloween and smite you both for your vile unbelief!
Too bad the Great Pumpkin never did THAT in Charlie Brown...
>104 YouKneeK: "The quality of mercy is not strained; It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven Upon the place beneath."
Except I'm not Portia. I am The Count of Monte Bookstooge! *dramatic reveal*
(well, except for the horrible imprisonment, super lurning skills and a veritable mountain of treasure at hand. But other than THAT, Dumas could have been writing about ME!)
Sorry Matt, it's been a long day and I'm letting off steam :)
>103 BookstoogeLT: "The Great Dickens shall rise out of the Pumpkin Patch this halloween and smite you both for your vile unbelief!"
I have only ever heard of the Little Dickens!
I shall make popcorn and pull up a chair to view this smiting.
>106 clamairy: Yeah, the Great Dickens, with hiding in the pumpkin patch all the time, isn't nearly so well known as the Little Dickens. He's kind of like Ctholho, Cthulhu's smarter but shyer older brother.
>99 mattries37315: Glad you enjoyed that, and your write up is terrific! I think Steinbeck would hate all of our strip malls and big box stores, same-o-same-o fast food places and such. It is getting difficult to find slices of individual places even in small towns.
I love Dickens. I read him with a passion. Really. *glances around*
>108 MrsLee: I didn't enjoy the required reading of Dickens in grade school, but I'm sure it was due to my lack of sophistication as a young reader. The enforcement of reading probably puts a lot of people off of any particular author.
I recently decided to take another stab at Dickens, and had a wonderful experience with Great Expectations. Next up is A Tale of Two Cities. I have a copy of Edwin Drood which I understand has been "completed" by another author - does anyone have any opinion of the original vs completed versions?
>102 YouKneeK: >109 Darth-Heather: I'm probably going to have to read Dickens again now that I'm an adult because that's what I've done with Steinbeck. I didn't enjoy The Pearl back in high school, but I loved Travels. I guess I'm going to have to use LT's recommendation system to figure out a good book to try in 2020 (I have a really big TBR pile on my bookshelves).
>103 BookstoogeLT: Tell the Great Dickens, "Bring It!"
>105 BookstoogeLT: *Smiling* No Problem Stooge *Filing away post in the back of mind with note entitled "To Pay Back"*
>108 MrsLee: Thank you very much. Don't worry The Great Dickens come Halloween, everyone knows his day is Christmas but he only goes after people named Stooge, I means Scrooge.
>111 mattries37315: Oh, your come backs were inspired! I'm sitting here chortling. Thank goodness Christmas is 6 months away!
The Iliad by Homer
The wrath of Achilles not only begins the oldest piece of Western literature, but is also its premise. The Iliad has been the basis of numerous clichés in literature, but at its root it is a story of a war that for centuries was told orally before being put down by Homer in which the great heroes of Greece fought for honor and glory that the men of Homer’s day could only imagine achieving.
The story of the Trojan War is well known and most people who have not read The Iliad assume they know what happens, but in fact at the end of the poem the city of Troy still stands and a wooden horse has not been mentioned. The Iliad tells of several weeks in the last year of the war that revolve around the dishonorable actions of Agamemnon that leads to Achilles refusing to fight with the rest of the Greeks and the disaster it causes in the resulting engagements against the Trojans. But then Achilles allows his friend Patroclus to lead his men into battle to save the Greek ships from being put to the torch only for Patroclus to advance to the walls of Troy and be slain by Hector. The wrath of Achilles turns from Agamemnon to Hector and the Trojans, leading to the death of Troy’s greatest warrior and the poem ending with his funeral.
Although the actions of Achilles and Hector take prominence, there are several other notable “storylines” one doesn’t know unless you’ve read epic. First and foremost is Diomedes, the second greatest fighter amongst the Greeks but oftentimes overlooked when it comes to adaptations especially to other important individuals like Odysseus, Menelaus, and the pivotal Patroclus. The second is how much the Olympians and other minor deities are thought to influence the events during this stretch of the war and how both mortals and immortals had to bow to Fate in all circumstances. The third is how ‘nationalistic’ the epic is in the Greek perspective because even though Hector is acknowledged the greatest mortal-born warrior in the war on both sides, as a Trojan he has to have moments of cowardice that none of the Greek heroes are allowed to exhibit and his most famous kill is enabled by Apollo instead of all by himself. And yet, even though Homer writes The Iliad as a triumphant Greek narrative the sections that have Hector’s flaws almost seem hollow as if Homer and his audience both subconsciously know that his epic is not the heroic wrath of Achilles but the tragic death of Hector.
The Iliad is the ultimate classic literature and no matter your reading tastes one must read it to have a better appreciation for all of literature as a whole. Although the it was first written over 2500 years ago, it shows the duality of heroic feats and complete tragedy that is war.
The link above goes to my Wordpress page that has my review of The Iliad by Homer, feel free to comment here or there.
I'm continuing to reading The Illiad the Odyssey by Homer.
>116 suitable1: SPOILER!
hahahahaaa. Yeah, I think the expiration on spoilers for this is a bit past...
The Odyssey by Homer
The crafty hero of The Iliad is in the last leg of his long ten year journey home, but it not only his story that Homer relates to the reader in this sequel to the first war epic in literature. The Odyssey describes the Odysseus’ return to Ithaca after twenty years along with the emergence of his son Telemachus as a new hero while his faithful wife Penelope staves off suitors who are crowding their home and eating their wealth daily.
Although the poem is named after his father, Telemachus’ “arc” begins first as the reader learns about the situation on Ithaca around Odysseus’ home and the search he begins for information on his father’s whereabouts. Then we shift to Odysseus on a beach longing to return home when he is informed his long sojourn is about to end and he sets off on a raft and eventually arrives among the Phaeacians, who he relates the previous ten years of his life to before they take him back home. On Ithaca, Odysseus and his son eventually meet and begin planning their revenge on the Penelope’s suitors that results in slaughter and a long-awaited family reunion with Penelope.
First and foremost The Odyssey is about coming home, in both Telemachus’ and Odysseus’ arcs there are tales of successful homecomings, unsuccessful homecomings, and homecoming that never happen of heroes from The Iliad. Going hand-in-hand with homecomings is the wanderings of other heroes whose adventures are not as exciting or as long as Odysseus’. Interwoven throughout the poem with homecomings and wanderings is the relationship between guests and hosts along with the difference between good and bad for both that has long reaching consequences. And finally throughout Odysseus’ long journey there are tests everywhere of all types for him to overcome or fail, but the most important are Penelope’s both physical and intimate.
Even though it is a sequel, The Odyssey is in complete contrast to The Iliad as instead of epic battle this poem focuses on a hero overcoming everything even the gods to return home. Suddenly the poet who gave readers a first-hand account of war shows his readers the importance of returning from war from the perspective of warriors and their families. Although they are completely different, The Odyssey in fact compliments The Iliad as well as completing it which means if you read one you have to read the other.
The link above goes to my Wordpress page that has my review of The Odyssey by Homer, feel free to comment here or there.
I've started reading The Wee Free Men by Terry Pratchett.
>119 clamairy: Yeah and there is going to be more, strange pivots in the future ;)
>109 Darth-Heather: I read the original The Mystery of Edwin Drood and enjoyed it immensely. I also enjoyed a piece at the end of the book that described the history of people attempting to complete the work. As Dickens left no notes on the story I feel any completed version would be doomed to be unsatisfactory as I would still be left wondering how Dickens would have finished it.
This topic is not marked as primarily about any work, author or other topic.