3M

This topic is currently marked as "dormant"—the last message is more than 90 days old. You can revive it by posting a reply.

1Andrew-theQM
Apr 19, 2019, 6:59 pm

Do you feel it was right to talk to Martha and Charlie in rhe way they did? Were the parents right to be so angry or was this guilty conscience?

2EadieB
Apr 20, 2019, 8:04 am

I think children and teenagers should be interviewed with an adult present. I think the parents do have a right to be angry.

3Carol420
Edited: Apr 20, 2019, 9:14 am

Bad move on their parts. They have now contaminated evidence (the interview), and anything they may have learned will be thrown out if the killer goes to trial. They should have known better. They will be lucky if the Montcrieff's don't file charges.

4Olivermagnus
Apr 20, 2019, 10:06 am

I think there should have been a formal interview with the parents included.

5gaylebutz
Apr 20, 2019, 10:32 am

Agree with everyone. I'm surprised that they did that because the children are still minors. The parents did have a right to be angry.

6Sergeirocks
Apr 20, 2019, 2:54 pm

Totally agree with you all. This was a sneaky way to go about things.

7Andrew-theQM
Apr 20, 2019, 3:07 pm

Stupid is as stupid does, and yes they were plain stupid!