HomeGroupsTalkZeitgeist
  • LibraryThing
  • Book discussions
  • Your LibraryThing
  • Join to start using.

Agriculture

Build the Open Shelves Classification

Join LibraryThing to post.

This topic is currently marked as "dormant"—the last message is more than 90 days old. You can revive it by posting a reply.

1laena
Feb 23, 2009, 11:46am Top

Includes works on farming, animal husbandry, growing crops, soil, agro-business.

2vpfluke
Mar 8, 2009, 12:12am Top

In the "Business" thread, I'm thinking agriculture should go there, and be lumped with forestry and fishing, a la NAICS.

3conners
Mar 20, 2009, 10:48am Top

Please check out this thread (http://www.librarything.com/topic/60594) for a link to the new OSC blog and a call for specific volunteer involvement. Thanks!

4ElijahMeeks
Apr 3, 2009, 12:17am Top

I think it would be a mistake to classify agriculture as existing under the rubric of business. Agriculture is not only a component of human activity according to a "work" model, but also a component of socio-political administrative activity, as evidenced in authoritarian and command economies (Such as Soviet Russia and Qin China). More importantly, agriculture is a primary socio-environmental linkage and so straddles the environmental sciences quite handily. My intuition is that agriculture should probably exist as a top-level category, or reside in some kind of socio-environmental sub-category, alongside horticulture, foraging and pastoralism.

5vpfluke
Apr 4, 2009, 12:50am Top

# 4

How would you place forestry and fishing in the OSC scheme? Perhaps they belong also in a socio-economic category.

6ElijahMeeks
Apr 4, 2009, 11:05am Top

From my own work (Which takes an environmental historical perspective) I see each of these practices as related to something called "Ecosystems Services", which would include beekeeping (A rather famous example), forest management as well as plantations, fishing and fish farming, but also wetlands management (Which clean the water, another ecosystems service), soil conservation, and a host of other issues.

One of the troublesome cross-categories relates to a major aspect of agriculture: Management and transportation of food resources. The Holodomor Famine in the Ukraine, for instance, is a political act, but it was carried out through the auspices of agricultural management. I realize that what you guys are creating is an ontology, and so to a certain degree it's simply declarative, and I'd imagine a scheme that deals with this delineation using the language and practices of environmental services and ecology would be cumbersome for a librarian, but maybe there's a more vernacular manner in which to present all of these things, which would be informed by the scholarly manner in which their described in the academy.

I'd be inclined to suggest a top-level category called Ecosystems Services, under which Natural Resources, Management, Agriculture, Pastoralism, &c all fall. But this may, as I was saying, prove too cumbersome.

About

This topic is not marked as primarily about any work, author or other topic.

Touchstones

No touchstones

You are using the new servers! | About | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 116,080,216 books! | Top bar: Always visible