Join LibraryThing to post.
This topic is currently marked as "dormant"—the last message is more than 90 days old. You can revive it by posting a reply.
Includes works of satire, books of jokes, books written by comedians, limericks & verse. Also includes humorous books on specific topics, such as relationships, work, and politics.
I still think Humour ought to be a subdivision under topics. A funny book about pets should go under Pets-Humour.
Isn't Gulliver's Travels satire? I think most people would expect to find it under Fiction.
Gulliver's Travels is a novel that is satirical. It goes under fiction, obviously. I am America and So Can You is the kind that goes here. As always, common sense trumps.
But I am America and So Can You would go under humor anyway as a "humorous book about politics," so the value of singling out "satire" as a type of humor still seems suspect. Maybe it should specify "humorous satire" as it does with "books on specific topics, such as relationships, work, and politics"?
As it is, satire is no more a subtype of humor than "books on relationships" is.
I have no clue how to subdivide this.
x. Books of Jokes
x. Books of Funny Poetry
x. Funny Fiction
x. humorous books on specific topics
That's . . . really not a useful division. Anyone with any better ideas?
I'd leave funny poetry with poetry, myself.
Parody is a reasonably big sub-group.
Joke books - certainly.
What would you do with writers like Thurber, Leacock, Runyon, Perelman, Woody Allen? Fiction? -Often. Anecdote? - Frequently. Fantasy? - Sometimes.
I'd put funny poetry in poetry as well. And funny fiction in fiction.
There's probably a better name for "Meta-Humor." (Sorry, I can't think of one at the moment.)
What about books that aren't on a specific topic and aren't jokes, like Brain Droppings?
I guess we can add a "Funny Non-Fiction" category. Or "Funny Essays"?
If we put "Funny X" in X, then what do we have left for this category. We can't have a top-level category consisting solely of joke books, can we?
Please check out this thread (http://www.librarything.com/topic/60594) for a link to the new OSC blog and a call for specific volunteer involvement. Thanks!
I feel like anything that can reasonably go under another category (like the Gulliver's Travels example), should, but I think that this is still useful for materials which are purely humorous in nature. Hence, Dave Barry's book on travel should be here rather than in the Travel section, as should joke books, etc. Certainly, it seems pretty strange when books like Steven Colbert's end up classified as "essays" in DDC.
I agree with the comment that humorous poetry, including limericks, should be in poetry. This category should be reserved for books that can't otherwise be classified.
Would something like this still qualify for the poetry category rather than humor?
>15 kristenn: Short answer from me is "Yes". But this -
which has parodies of prose, plays and poetry, would have to go in Humour >> Parody. I think this is one of those things that is not worth even a minor squabble, but to me, comic verse is a category of poetry first.
>15 kristenn: I would put that book with poetry. From what I can tell from its Amazon page, it is an anthology of poems side by side with parodies of those poems. It is essentially an anthology of poetry and literary criticism, with the parodies serving the function of critical essays.
>16 abbottthomas: From just the librarything page, there's not enough to decide exactly where it would best fit. It looks like it might be an anthology of humorous writing--essays, poems, etc. If that is the case, I think it would best fit here in humor.
The humor category could end up a sort of junk-drawer of otherwise unclassifiable books--everything from a collection of New Yorker cartoons, to books like Milton Berle's Private Joke File, to random things like Stuff on My Cat.
I would also assume this would be the place for critical works about humor. Yes?
This topic is not marked as primarily about any work, author or other topic.