|
Loading...
LibraryThing recommendationsMember recommendations
Loading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. The Sword and Sorcery genre has been a bit neglected by me (other than Howard's Conan). Thus, this was my first encounter with either Moorcock or Elric. I must say that I will be coming back! I was delighted at how well written Elric of Melnibone was! This novel made me want to get my hands on the Finnish "Kalevala", which influenced the Elric novels, as it has many other novels. Moorcock has also got me interested in the "Monsieur Zenith" pulp fictions, which he says he drew heavily upon for the creation of Elric. I also will be keeping my eye out for Poul Anderson's "The Broken Sword". There are quite a few dark themes running here, henceforth Elric as an anti-hero. It will be interesting to see how well he fares, as his own conscience has warned him of the Left-Hand path that he is on. I might point out that Arioch is a name with quite a bit of historicity to it in reality. I will say lastly that the imagery and the tale are quite rich and memorable here. I particularly was fond of the Melnibone ships. This is one of those novels that gives you that warm tingle in the gut. Good stuff! Yes, I seem to be in something of a science fiction/fantasy pattern in recent reading. Nostalgic, entertaining...Moorcock brings back the excitement of the sf/fantasy of the 60's and 70's, when it took on literary techniques and dark themes from the culture. This reminds me of how much I enjoyed the first few books in Roger Zelazny's Amber series. And there's a lot more Elric to read. Yes, I seem to be in something of a science fiction/fantasy pattern in recent reading. Nostalgic, entertaining...Moorcock brings back the excitement of the sf/fantasy of the 60's and 70's, when it took on literary techniques and dark themes from the culture. This reminds me of how much I enjoyed the first few books in Roger Zelazny's Amber series. And there's a lot more Elric to read. Yes, I seem to be in something of a science fiction/fantasy pattern in recent reading. Nostalgic, entertaining...Moorcock brings back the excitement of the sf/fantasy of the 60's and 70's, when it took on literary techniques and dark themes from the culture. This reminds me of how much I enjoyed the first few books in Roger Zelazny's Amber series. And there's a lot more Elric to read. no reviews | add a review
References to this work on external resources.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book description |
|
The youthful Elric is a cynical and melancholy king, heir to a nation whose 100,000-year rule of the world ended less than 500 years hence. More interested in brooding contemplation than holding the throne, Elric is a reluctant ruler, but he also realizes that no other worthy successor exists and the survival of his once-powerful, decadent nation depends on him alone. Elric's nefarious, brutish cousin Yrkoon has no patience for his physically weak kinsman, and he plots constantly to seize Elric's throne, usually over his dead body. Elric of Melniboné follows Yrkoon's scheming, reaching its climax in a battle between Elric and Yrkoon with the demonic runeblades Stormbringer and Mournblade. In this battle, Elric gains control of the soul-stealing Stormbringer, an event that proves pivotal to the Elric saga. --Paul Hughes
(retrieved from Amazon Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:58:22 -0400)
The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details.
Quick Links |
I wasn't all that crazy about this one. I read for character, above all else, and I'm also pretty big on setting and style. I'm not sure that characterization is Moorcock's strong suit, his setting is decent but rather sketchy, and his style didn't really sway me one way or the other.
But I kept on reading because I wanted to understand why Moorcock is such a big deal. I don't know enough about the state of pre-Elric fantasy to say for sure, but I wonder if perhaps it's the focus on morality that sets this series apart from its predecessors. Moorcock still utilizes many standard tropes--including damsels in distress, evil usurpers and daring rescues--but the moral element sets the story apart.
Melniboné is not such a nice place. The Melniboneans do whatever makes them happy, even if it screws everyone else over. Elric, however, is different. He's spent a lot of time thinking about the way he relates to the world, and he's decided that the Melnibonean way just isn't for him.
And yet, this isn't an earthshaking revelation. Elric doesn't necessarily want to turn his back on Melniboné and everyone in it. He doesn't even think that his friends ought to take more of an interest in morality and ethics. He's still one of them insofar as his moral dilemmas are his own. His preoccupations please him, and he wants to change himself, but he's none too concerned about the world. It's not about improving things. It's about his inner life. I thought that was a fairly stance for a recently-moralized character to take.
(A much longer, more involved version of this review originally appeared on my blog, Stella Matutina. There's also some good discussion in the comments). (