Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Popular Crime: Reflections on the…

Popular Crime: Reflections on the Celebration of Violence (original 2011; edition 2012)

by Bill James

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
2211452,606 (3.31)17
Title:Popular Crime: Reflections on the Celebration of Violence
Authors:Bill James
Info:Scribner (2012), Paperback, 512 pages
Collections:Your library

Work details

Popular Crime: Reflections on the Celebration of Violence by Bill James (2011)



Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

» See also 17 mentions

Showing 1-5 of 14 (next | show all)
I'm extremely conflicted here. On the one hand, this book meanders, doesn't always make clear points (or any point at all), is sometimes hard to follow, and the author frequently exhibits boorish attitudes. On the other hand, it was really fun to read. ( )
  ratastrophe | Jan 26, 2016 |
I'm not entirely sure what this book is about - I mean, yes, it's about popular crime, but in what sense? It seems to be mostly about why certain stories become famous, but it's also about why crimes are and aren't solved effectively, what's wrong with the American justice system, and how things have changed over the past hundred or so years. James makes some assumptions and generalizations I think are flat wrong, but he also makes some excellent and interesting points. I had a fun time reading this, and I'd love to have a beer with the guy and discuss his ideas, so I'll call this book a success. ( )
  jen.e.moore | Jan 25, 2015 |
I enjoyed the book. I think he did a good job highlighting many of the cases and made his point how the media drives the popularity of a case and can in some cases taint it in the criminal justice system. My only problem with James is he should keep his personal view on politics to himself. ( )
  crazyjster | May 9, 2013 |
I read this book with fascination, horror, and wonder at how James could take a sensational topic and bring meaning to it in his own inimitable way. As an analyst of baseball, James is the statistician without peer. As a connoisseur of tabloid news, he brings a deeper understanding of what binds these tales together, these murders and kidnappings, and why they appeal to us year after year, even as each one is advertised as the "murder of the century." Still, it is one thing to delve into a single murder and learn in detail what happened before, during and after a psychopath delivered the final blow, and how that person is still human while being painted a monster, and another thing to read about hundreds of crimes in succession, one more lurid than the next. It was hard to finish the book because of the sheer volume of serial murderers he includes.

Why couldn't the book even with its detailed table of contents and index have contained a bibliography with all of the books James recommends as follow up reading? I wish the editors had considered this book as a potential reference. And I wonder what lawyers and advocates for prison reform think of this book. James seems to have a thorough disdain for both groups.

( )
  paakre | Apr 27, 2013 |
This book is, to use a "popular" phrase, a hot mess. I'd never read anything by Bill James before, but apparently he's a quite well-known writer on baseball. In Popular Crime, his stated purpose is to trace the history of true crime books, TV, and media coverage and show whether or not they are "bad" for society. Unfortunately, he doesn't come anywhere near meeting his goals.

While James lays out the crimes in chronological order, he doesn't trace the history of media coverage of famous murders like he claims he's going to. For example, while he mentions the Helen Jewett case in one of the early chapters, and how much media coverage it received, he declines to discuss it at any length because (and I'm paraphrasing here) too many books have already been written about it. Which had me going, "Wait? What? Isn't that what your book is supposed to be about?"

There are some famous murders that James go into great detail about, some that he skips altogether except for a quick mention, and some that he recaps briefly in a way that leaves you wanting more.

James talks about his editor at several points in the book, as in "if my editor chooses to leave this in." (Again, paraphrased, but you get the picture.) This is bizarre, as I was pretty sure by about 50 pages in that James didn't have an editor, as it seems every tangent was followed. The most infuriating for me was when James tried to establish a point system (I'm not kidding) for how much value to place on evidence at a trial, with a certain number of points being necessary to convict. Similarly, he tries to set up a scale for how likely murders are to become famous. He spends page after page on these pseudo-statistics and it gets to be mind-numblingly dull.

James also has lots of thoughts and theories about the criminal justice system, including a totally unfeasible prison reform model. His book becomes just as much about that as it does about true crime.

As far as analyzing the true crime industry, he ends up reviewing books on many of the cases he writes about. At first, I wrote down James's recommendations, but then I figured out we have very different criteria for what makes a good book. For example, I loved Joe McGinniss's Fatal Vision, which James seems to think was too long and detailed, and therefore dull. Hello, have you read your own book?

The worst part is that James is actually a good writer. Some of the chapters, especially those on unsolved murders and famously controversial cases, were riveting. Unfortunately, these parts are overshadowed by overall inconsistency and James's attempt to include everything but the kitchen sink. There are the kernels of several different, good, books inside of this bulky mess. Seriously, if James had an editor, they didn't do a very good job.

One final note before I wrap up: There are no footnotes, endnotes, or even a bibliography. In a book about media coverage of true crime. Really? When he's discussing a certain book he'll include the title, author, and publisher in the body of the paragraph. But for the most part, we have no idea where he's getting any of his information from. I want to see references to newspaper articles! I know there are books he's referring to that he doesn't mention! What are they? At one point James says he worked on this book for ten years, and you can tell he's done a lot of research, so why couldn't he show us the research he's done? Instead, we are left to rely on James himself, and if he were a literary character, he would definitely be an unreliable narrator.

Wow, I didn't realize how many problems I had with this book until I started typing up my review. It sounds like I really hated the book, but while I was reading it I couldn't put it down. I guess I would recommend it if you're already familiar with the true crime genre, and either have the patience to wade through multiple tangents and statistics, or are willing to skip those parts to get to the meaty bits. Two stars. ( )
  allthesedarnbooks | Feb 27, 2013 |
Showing 1-5 of 14 (next | show all)
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Series (with order)
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Awards and honors
This book is dedicated to Phyllis McCarthy, my wife's most gracious mother.
First words
In Rome in the year 24 AD, the praetor Plaautius Silvanus pushed his wife Apronia out of the window in the middle of the night.
Last words
(Click to show. Warning: May contain spoilers.)
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Publisher series
Original language

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English (2)

Book description
Haiku summary

No descriptions found.

Presents a cultural analysis of sensational crime in America that profiles such infamous cases as the Lindbergh baby kidnapping, the Black Dahlia murder, and O.J. Simpson's trial to offer insight into topics ranging from evidence practices to radicalism.… (more)

(summary from another edition)

Quick Links

Swap Ebooks Audio
87 wanted

Popular covers


Average: (3.31)
1 2
2 10
2.5 1
3 10
3.5 7
4 20
4.5 1
5 3

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.


You are using the new servers! | About | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 116,013,686 books! | Top bar: Always visible