HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
Search Site
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Loading...

This Is Chick-Lit

by Lauren Baratz-Logsted

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingConversations
463550,247 (3.62)None
The genre of fiction known as "chick-lit" has been a lightning rod for debate in the world of literature, raising questions such as Is chick-lit really literature or just harmless fluff? Is this really an accurate portrayal of the lives of modern women? Eighteen renowned authors--including Jennifer Coburn, Raelynn Hillhouse, Harley Jane Kozak, Cara Lockwood, and Rachel Pine--weigh in with the best of chick-lit, proving that this genre deserves as much, or more, respect as any other. In addition to their story, each author elaborates on her feelings about the "chick-lit" label and recommends literary fiction writers that have inspired them.… (more)
None
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

Showing 3 of 3
great collection ( )
  Kaethe | Jan 18, 2008 |
It turns out that last year there was a book of short stories published called “This is Not Chick Lit.” I’d never heard of that book until I found out about this one, and I’m not sure I’d have bought it if I HAD heard of it, since I think defining something by what it isn’t is a bit absurd. Couldn’t that book just as accurately have been named “This is Not Science Fiction” or “This is Not 18th Century Romantic Poetry” or “This is Not a Treatise on Quantum Physics?” (Although I will admit to a bit of curiosity about that book now that I’ve read this one. It would be interesting to compare the two.)

Anyway, the book “This is Chick-Lit” is a collection of short stories written and compiled as a response to the previously mentioned book, by a group of women writers who write chick-lit and are proud of it.

I thought the introduction to the book was fascinating, as it turns out this is a debate that has raged since long before the term “chick lit” was ever coined. The editor quotes a letter written by Charlotte Bronte in 1848, in which she bemoans the popularity and critical acclaim of books written by a Miss Jane Austen, saying she doesn’t understand their appeal and finds Ms. Austen merely “shrewd and observant.” Um, yeah, ok. You know, if the very worst thing someone could find to say about ME was that I’m shrewd and observant I’d count myself as having done pretty well in life.

In a similar vein, one of the criticisms frequently leveled at the genre known as chick lit is that it consists “merely” of stories written by, for, and about women. Well again, I’d say….yeah, so? What’s wrong with that? Why are we, as women, so frequently hard on ourselves and on each other? I bet if there was a name for books written by, for, and about men you wouldn’t have a bunch of men saying that’s a bad thing. IMO, there ARE books out there written by, for, and about men, but they’re just called “books.” Sigh. It’s hard to debate a thing if you don’t stick a label on it first, yes?

Anyway, on to the book itself. On the whole, I liked it. It was an interesting cross-section of writers and stories. As with any short story anthology, I think some stories worked better than others. Short stories can be a tricky bit of writing to do correctly. They need to be an engaging slice of life so that you want to know what happens to the characters, but they shouldn’t feel like the writer tried to compress an entire novel’s worth of story into just a few pages. Some of these stories managed that balancing act quite well, some not so much.

There were, unfortunately, several stories that felt to me more like the Cliff’s Notes version of novels rather than true short stories. They weren’t bad, but they made me feel a bit rushed and cheated, and left me wishing the writers had developed these stories into novellas or full-length novels instead. And there were a few stories in the book that simply didn’t appeal to me. They were well-written, but not to my personal taste. Again though, I find that in almost every short story anthology I’ve ever read.

But at least half the stories in the book were true short stories and quite good ones at that. Some of my favorites include “Shell Game” by Lauren Baratz-Logsted, a story that effectively turns a nursery rhyme into a grown-up cautionary tale; “Trash Talk” by Karin Gillespie; “Meeting Cute” by Andrea Schicke Hirsch; “Secret Agent Chick” by Raelynn Hillhouse; and my personal favorite of the collection, “Cafe con Leche Crush” by Heather Swain, a slice-of-life story that is exactly what a short story should be.

“This is Chick-Lit” is a book I’m glad I read. My grade for it: a solid B. ( )
1 vote DebR | Jul 14, 2007 |
This is an anthology that's worth every penny, in my opinion. I liked almost all of the contributions from writers I already read and was happy to have found a few new voices.

Caren Lissner's The Database is a standout, with a nice mix of sci-fi and dark humor.

Takeoffs and Landings is a little weak, and asks the reader to suspend way too much disbelief. The protagonist's level of self-pity is too much, even for chick lit, where neurotic narrators beat themselves up about every little thing.

Trash Talk was hilarious, you knew the ending was going to be predictable, but Karen Gillespie still kept you reading. She also wrote the popular Bottom Dollar Girl series, I just might have to check those out.

Every Girl's Dream started out with a ludicrous set-up, at the end tho, I was almost tearing up. ( )
  emigre | Nov 17, 2006 |
Showing 3 of 3
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Epigraph
Dedication
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS
Canonical LCC

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English

None

The genre of fiction known as "chick-lit" has been a lightning rod for debate in the world of literature, raising questions such as Is chick-lit really literature or just harmless fluff? Is this really an accurate portrayal of the lives of modern women? Eighteen renowned authors--including Jennifer Coburn, Raelynn Hillhouse, Harley Jane Kozak, Cara Lockwood, and Rachel Pine--weigh in with the best of chick-lit, proving that this genre deserves as much, or more, respect as any other. In addition to their story, each author elaborates on her feelings about the "chick-lit" label and recommends literary fiction writers that have inspired them.

No library descriptions found.

Book description
Haiku summary

Current Discussions

None

Popular covers

Quick Links

Rating

Average: (3.62)
0.5
1
1.5
2 1
2.5
3 5
3.5 2
4 2
4.5
5 3

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 204,235,187 books! | Top bar: Always visible