Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Lying About Hitler: History, Holocaust, and the David Irving Trial (edition 2002)
Lying About Hitler: History, Holocaust, and the David Irving Trial by Richard J. Evans
Amazon.com Product Description (ISBN 0465021530, Paperback)
In ruling against the controversial historian David Irving, whose libel suit against the American historian Deborah Lipstadt was tried in April 2000, the High Court in London labeled Irving a falsifier of history. No objective historian, declared the judge, would manipulate the documentary record in the way that Irving did. Richard J. Evans, a Cambridge historian and the chief adviser for the defense, uses this famous trial as a lens for exploring a range of difficult questions about the nature of the historian's enterprise.
(retrieved from Amazon Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:11:33 -0400)
"In April 2000 a High Court judge branded the writer David Irving a racist, an antisemite, a Holocaust denier, and a falsifier of history. Irvings?? attempt to silence his critics by means of a libel suit against the American historian Deborah Lipstadt was decisively rejected in a judgement later confirmed by the Court of Appeal. Faced with mountainous costs to pay, Irving was declared bankrupt on 5 March 2002. None of this has stopped him continuing to try to prevent the publication of books that expose him as a manipulator of historical documents and a Holocaust denier. The key expert witness against Irving was the Cambridge historian Richard J. Evans, a specialist on modern German history and author of In Defence of History. Although Evanss?? report was upheld in all its major points by the High Court, Irvings?? threats of legal action have intimidated a series of publishers. Now Verso brings you the book in full. Evans describes how he came to be involved in the case, and reflects on the interaction of historical and legal rules of evidence. He recounts his discovery of how Irving falsified the documentary evidence on the Second World War, and demonstrates his connections with far-right Holocaust deniers in the United States.Evans argues that the trial does for the twenty-first century what the Eichmann trial did for the second half of the twentieth. It vindicated historys?? ability to come to reasoned conclusions on the basis of a careful examination of the evidence, even when eyewitnesses and survivors are no longer around to tell the tale." -- BOOK JACKET.
(summary from another edition)
Is this you?
Become a LibraryThing Author.