Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Lying About Hitler: History, Holocaust, and…
Loading...

Lying About Hitler: History, Holocaust, and the David Irving Trial (edition 2002)

by Richard J. Evans

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
171363,287 (4.06)6
Member:InigoMontoya
Title:Lying About Hitler: History, Holocaust, and the David Irving Trial
Authors:Richard J. Evans
Info:Basic Books (2002), Paperback, 322 pages
Collections:Your library, To read
Rating:
Tags:Study, History

Work details

Lying About Hitler: History, Holocaust, and the David Irving Trial by Richard J. Evans

  1. 00
    The Irving Judgment: David Irving v. Penguin Books and Professor Deborah Lipstadt by Mr. Justice Gray (AuntieCatherine)
    AuntieCatherine: This is the devastating judgment in the Irving Trial at which Professor Evans was a witness
  2. 01
    The Borderlands of Science: Where Sense Meets Nonsense by Michael Shermer (ehines)
    ehines: More about people who believe in the face of all contrary evidence.
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

Showing 3 of 3
Not everything it could be. The material in the first half was clearly gathered and written with another purpose in mind (as expert testimony on David Irving for the English courts), and Evans can be a surprisingly ham-fisted writer at times (e.g. whole, memorable descriptive passages reappear verbatim). BUT a very interesting look at how historians parse cryptic archive material, evaluate plausibility and judge motive. And the narrative and writing really pick up once Evans shifts his attention to the trial. In reviewing post-trial evaluations the writing loses direction again, but all in all a good, thought-provoking, and informative book. ( )
  ehines | Dec 23, 2010 |
Evans (a historian witness at the Irving trial) makes clear better than some other books about the case why Irving really was factually wrong on important points, instead of just saying "you can't deny the Holcaust" as too many other writers do. ( )
  antiquary | Sep 10, 2007 |
Showing 3 of 3
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Series (with order)
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Awards and honors
Epigraph
Dedication
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Publisher series
Book description
Haiku summary

Amazon.com Product Description (ISBN 0465021530, Paperback)

In ruling against the controversial historian David Irving, whose libel suit against the American historian Deborah Lipstadt was tried in April 2000, the High Court in London labeled Irving a falsifier of history. No objective historian, declared the judge, would manipulate the documentary record in the way that Irving did. Richard J. Evans, a Cambridge historian and the chief adviser for the defense, uses this famous trial as a lens for exploring a range of difficult questions about the nature of the historian's enterprise.

(retrieved from Amazon Tue, 19 Apr 2011 05:04:33 -0400)

(see all 2 descriptions)

"In April 2000 a High Court judge branded the writer David Irving a racist, an antisemite, a Holocaust denier, and a falsifier of history. Irvings?? attempt to silence his critics by means of a libel suit against the American historian Deborah Lipstadt was decisively rejected in a judgement later confirmed by the Court of Appeal. Faced with mountainous costs to pay, Irving was declared bankrupt on 5 March 2002. None of this has stopped him continuing to try to prevent the publication of books that expose him as a manipulator of historical documents and a Holocaust denier. The key expert witness against Irving was the Cambridge historian Richard J. Evans, a specialist on modern German history and author of In Defence of History. Although Evanss?? report was upheld in all its major points by the High Court, Irvings?? threats of legal action have intimidated a series of publishers. Now Verso brings you the book in full. Evans describes how he came to be involved in the case, and reflects on the interaction of historical and legal rules of evidence. He recounts his discovery of how Irving falsified the documentary evidence on the Second World War, and demonstrates his connections with far-right Holocaust deniers in the United States.Evans argues that the trial does for the twenty-first century what the Eichmann trial did for the second half of the twentieth. It vindicated historys?? ability to come to reasoned conclusions on the basis of a careful examination of the evidence, even when eyewitnesses and survivors are no longer around to tell the tale." -- BOOK JACKET.… (more)

(summary from another edition)

Quick Links

Swap Ebooks Audio
1 avail.
14 wanted
3 pay

Popular covers

Rating

Average: (4.06)
0.5
1
1.5
2 1
2.5
3 6
3.5 2
4 11
4.5 2
5 10

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

Help/FAQs | About | Privacy/Terms | Blog | Contact | LibraryThing.com | APIs | WikiThing | Common Knowledge | Legacy Libraries | 81,894,956 books!