The End of Kings: A History of Republics and Republicans (edition 2000)

by William R. Everdell

Members	Reviews	Popularity	Average rating	Conversations
13	1	657,026	(3.5)	None

Add to your library

Add to wishlist

Title	The End of Kings: A History of Republics and Republicans
Author	William R. Everdell
Tags	republics, republicans, politics, history, radicalism, impeachment, monarchy, states, sovereignty, government, sovreign, tyranny, Brutus, QL, Roman Republic, democracy, Athens, tribalism, Machiavelli, Florence, Venice, commune, city-state, Reformation, John Calvin, Protestantism, John Milton, Oliver Cromwell, Switzerland, William Tell, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, ancient history, Thaddeus Stevens, imperialism, imperial presidency, Julius Caesar, Roman Empire, Polybius, Gustav Noske, SPD, Weimar, Weimar Republic, Leon Gambetta, Robespierre, ruling class, class struggle, constitution, constitutionalism, dictator, dictatorship, France, England, French History, English History, German History, Gracchus, Greek History, Medici, king, monarch, Netherlands, Paris, Puritanism, Reconstruction, revolution, tribunes, United States
Collections	Your library, QL, Currently reading
Rating
Review	Republicans, the Republic, and the Imperial Presidency http://monacojerry.livejournal.com/85301.html from Shandean Postscripts to Politics, Philosophy, Culture: In The End of Kings: A History of Republics and Republicans, William R. Everdell points out the stark contrast between the reaction of Congress to Ronald Reagan's undermining of the Constitution through his funding of a "private" terrorist war in Central America (called "the Iran-Contra" scandal, though that is a misnomer) and the reaction to President Bill Clinton's lies about his own personal sexual affairs. Twelve years after Iran-Contra, the issue of presidential power came up again, only this time Congress actually voted to impeach. This time the president was chief of the Democratic Party and the party of impeachment was the Republican, the party that had once endorsed Reagan. Small "r" republicans, one might think, should have been pleased at the Republican initiative, and the more republican they were, the less pleased one should have expected them to be that the impeachment process, which the Framers designed to check monarchical tendencies in the executive branch, had not proceeded all the way to conviction by the Senate. In the main, however, republicans disageed with Republicans . . . Why was this so? Was it because the impeachment of William Clinton turned out badly, like that of Andrew Johnson in 1868 thus tarnishing the impeachment tool? This theory is unlikely is unlikely because the Senate's failure to convict Johnson did not, in fact, prevent impeachment from "working." Its effect was to cast an impeachment shadow over every subsequent presidency, and not until Grover Cleveland did a president indulge in the kind of unilateral action that had been characteristic of Lincoln and [Andrew] Johnson. Everdell then points out reasons why other presidents should have been impeached but weren't. Lying, obstruction of justice, and aggrandisement of executive power are grounds for impeachment if the idea of the Republican form of goverrnment has any meaning. Going to war by executive order is grounds for impeachment if you adhere to the ideology of republicanism. There are very few republicans left in the commanding heights of the Republic. For republicans executive power is suspicious by its nature. In this light one might ponder the non-existence of republicanism in the Republican party. For a conservative republican the idea of the Imperial Presidency should be considered an abomination. By any definitiion, there have been very few leaders of the Republican Party since Thaddeus Stevens who have actually been republicans, and there have been very few leaders of the Republican Party since Robert Taft who have even tried to be conservative republicans. The name of "The Republican Party" has become like one of those real estate developments or geriatric care cente
Other authors 1
Publication date	2000
Publication	University Of Chicago Press (2000), Edition: 2 Sub, Paperback, 422 pages
ISBN	0226224821 / 9780226224824
Number of volumes	1
Number of copies	1
Pages	422
Dimensions	9.04 x 6.2 x 0.91 inches
Weight	1.24 pounds


LC Classification 1	JC421.E93
Dewey	321.8609


Subjects	Republics › History


Primary language eng	English
Secondary language	(blank)
Original language


Comments
Date acquired
Date started
Date finished
Summary 1	The End of Kings: A History of Republics and Republicans by William R. Everdell (2000)


BCID	XXX-
From where?
Data source	amazon.com
Private	No


Citation	MLA, APA, Chicago/Turabian, Wikipedia citation