|
Loading...
LibraryThing recommendationsMember recommendationsLoading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. Mr. Cahill is a very good writer. This book is almost as good as the first in his series The Hinges of History. ( )Cahill is one of those writers that is a like a singer that doesn't any category so its hard to really dive into his writing. The book's design is kind of neat. It reminds of the DK books. I have fond -- if vague -- memories of Cahill's How the Irish Saved Civilization, which came out over a decade ago. So when I saw this book, I decided to get it. And I've been enjoying it so far. But on page 87 Cahill goes off on this half-page diatribe about how guilt is the greatest gift the Judeo-Christian tradition has given the Western world. He says that without it we would all be psychopaths. WTF? What about compassion and empathy? Why do we have to see ourselves as sinners in order to be good people? So the author has just revealed his bias, and I'm not enjoying the book so much now. It's hard to trust an author who thinks that way. I'm not saying I have to agree with everything an author writes -- far from it -- but to accept someone's expertise you have to trust them. Somebody who thinks Catholic guilt is a good thing is someone I can't believe. I'll put Mysteries away for now. Maybe a few days' distance will let me get the bad taste of Cahill's rant out of my brain... This book is best used for the excellent pictures. Cahills books generally deal with western history, though western history is permeated with the religions at least, that arose in the middle east, and most accounts begin with the middle east, Egypt and the fertile cresent centered in Mesopotamia. I have to admit that his books are in some way comforting, dealing with topics that are somewhat familiar to me. But, rather than simply presenting the events of history, he presents ideas and their impact. In this particular book I enjoyed reading about Hildebrand, an influential woman, and in Cahill's interpretation of the idea of Thomas Aquinas in contrast to those of Augustine. In short, he sees Augustine as more in line with Plato, with the metaphor of viewing reality from the cave and seeing shadows. But Aquinas, he sees as trusting the senses, and viewing the body as a good thing. I was also somewhat astonished to read that limbo had been out of favor in the Catholic church for some time, since I had learned about it as a child in Catholic school. This was in a section about Dante and the Divine Comedy, when he was talking about Dante's difficulty with the idea of the unbaptized going to hell. Limbo was a later solution to this difficulty, but, apparently has been de-emphasized along with the idea that the unbaptized go to hell. He has some scathing things to say about the recent sexual scandals in the Catholic church and Pope JohnPaul II and Bernard, implicating them as part of the coverup and in the church's treatment of the victims. I assumed as I read this that he was writing as someone who was raised Catholic, and looking it up I found that he was educated by Jesuits, and is currently a practicing Catholic. no reviews | add a review
References to this work on external resources.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book description |
|
(retrieved from Amazon Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:58:25 -0400)
The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details.
Quick Links |