

Loading... Podzemlje (original 1997; edition 2007)by Don Delilo
Work detailsUnderworld by Don DeLillo (1997)
![]()
501 Must-Read Books (157) » 27 more Unread books (102) 20th Century Literature (212) Top Five Books of 2017 (233) Favorite Long Books (113) 1990s (25) Your Cheating Heart (41) Best American Books (52) 100 New Classics (91) BBC Radio 4 Bookclub (225) Books (33) My TBR (99) Simon & Schuster (10) No current Talk conversations about this book. Read the first 100 pages and quit. Didn't catch. Excerpts from my original GR review (Apr 2009): - I was in a receptive, uninterrupted state when I read this [in 2002], so that I can proudly say I got through it. How much can be retained from a literary tome like this? Hard to say, I think my brain had indigestion for a few days. - My most favorite part is the Prologue "The Triumph of Death", with the Dodgers-Giants game, Bobby Thompson's shot heard 'round the world, Sinatra/Gleason/J Edgar Hoover in the stands, the dreamy chase for the winning belt. I appreciate the enormous literary talent of any author brave enough to craft such a sweeping saga, but for many readers I think it would be easy to run the battery low trying to decipher this. While I didn't have any trouble reading it, the structure of the book didn't really work for me (jumping back and forth in time & between characters) and I ended up with a feeling of "so what was the point of all that?" I never really became engaged with any of the characters and the connection between some of them seemed extremely thin. Oh well... Don DeLillo's "Underworld" is a very modern novel. The thing is, I despise modern novels. I have no interest in baseball. I couldn't even remember the character's names partway through this.... I just found it so very dull. I didn't care what happened to the baseball, who got killed and why or about Marian and her husband's martial troubles. I know this novel has received heaps of acclaim and praise... so I'm sure it's wonderful if you're into these types of books, but this one definitely wasn't for me.
'"Underworld" is a victim of its own ambition: by trying to cover such a wide range of characters and situations, DeLillo loses track of some of them' ... 'Despite its faults DeLillo has created an ambitious and powerful novel...' This "is his best novel and perhaps that most elusive of creatures, a great American novel."
References to this work on external resources.
|
![]() Popular coversRatingAverage:![]()
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
The book itself is pretty long. There is much to say in the manner of memory and nostalgia. However, it does take a bit to get going, and this is something that you can’t do with my current attention span. The fact of the matter is, although I do enjoy reading, it is difficult for me to focus on this particular book. I don’t know why that is. The book has mesmerizing dialogue and reminds me somewhat of Gravity’s Rainbow by Thomas Pynchon. I don’t really feel like reading it any further than what I have. Perhaps I will return to it later. (