Sign in/joinLanguage: English [ others ]
Over forty million books on members' bookshelves.
Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces That Shape the Universe by Martin Rees
Loading...

Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces That Shape the Universe

by Martin Rees

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingConversations
374412,260 (4)None
Loading...
won't like will probably not like will probably like will like will love

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

Showing 4 of 4
Rees’ small volume on cosmology is good but not great. He details the origins and fine-tuned-ness of six physical constants: N (10^36 = strength of atomic electrical forces); E (0.007 = nuclear force); Omega (the amount of dark matter in the universe); Lambda (anti-gravitational force); Q (1/100,000 = ratio between fundamental energies); and D (3 = number of dimensions). If any of these numbers were slightly off, we would not have the universe as we recognize it today. While Rees has neither the flare or plain-spoken-ness that Brian Greene possesses, he gets his point across with some competence. I wouldn’t recommend starting with this book, but it is nevertheless a decent source of cosmological wonder. ( )
NielsenGW | Feb 8, 2009 |  
Essential reading if you want to know why we're here. This book gives a clear understanding of the anthropic principle -- there are many different kinds of separate inflationary universe bubbles, so of course we are in the one that happens to be able to support us. Note that this kind of multiverse is completely different from the multiverse aspect described by Deutsch and Julian Barbour (see my reviews). This book describes and explains the multiverses separated in space, really all in this same Now. The other books deal with the multiplicity of multiverses "arising" in parallel at each moment in time, vastly more multiple than the accepted inflationary bubble universes. Put the two models together and you've got it all, a total theory of objective reality, and ultimately an explanation of why we exist -- the answer: because everything that can exist does exist. Why everything instead of nothing? Why not? This is as far as our answers will ever go. ( )
Stephen_Arthur | Jul 5, 2008 |  
The way our universe is depends on six numbers, pretty much. Two of those numbers are related to basic forces, two fix the size and texture of the universe and the final two fix the properties of space. The numbers have certain values and even the smallest changes in those numbers would lead to universes very much unlike our own.

That is all rather curious and interesting. Martin Rees, the Astronomer Royal, uses these six numbers as a springboard to explain the current state of knowledge about our universe. This is a fairly short book, but it's packed full of knowledge. While Rees writes for the general public (and he writes well), understanding this book requires certain level of intellectual curiosity. The concepts he covers are so complicated, I think it would be rather hard to explain them with more clarity.

In any case, this is recommended reading for everyone interested in finding out how our universe came to be.

(Original review at my review blog) ( )
msaari | Mar 28, 2008 |  
Showing 4 of 4
0.033 seconds to build listing
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Series (with order)
Canonical Title
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Awards and honors
Epigraph
Dedication
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Book description

Amazon.com (ISBN 0465036732, Paperback)

Just six numbers govern the shape, size, and texture of our universe. If their values were only fractionally different, we would not exist: nor, in many cases, would matter have had a chance to form. If the numbers that govern our universe were elegant--1, say, or pi, or the Golden Mean--we would simply shrug and say that the universe was an elegant mathematical puzzle. But the numbers Martin Rees discusses are far from tidy. Was the universe "tweaked" or is it one of many universes, all run by slightly different, but equally messy, rules?

This is familiar ground, though rarely so comprehensively explored. What makes Rees's book exceptional is his conviction that cosmology is as materialistic and as conceptually simple as any of the earth sciences. Indeed,

cosmology is simpler in one important respect: once the starting point is specified, the outcome is in broad terms predictable. All large patches of the universe that start off the same way end up statistically similar. In contrast, if the Earth's history were re-run, it could end up with a quite different biosphere.

Rees demonstrates how the cosmos is full of "fossils" from which we can deduce how our universe developed as surely as we infer the earth's past from the relics found in sedimentary rocks. Rees's theme is nothing less than the colossal richness of the universe. It is an ambitious book, but if anything, it deserves to be longer. --Simon Ings, Amazon.co.uk

(retrieved from Amazon Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:58:17 -0400)

(see all 2 descriptions)

The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details.

Popular covers

 

Help/FAQs | About | Privacy/Terms | Blog | Contact | LibraryThing.com | APIs | WikiThing | Common Knowledge | 41,206,673 books!