HomeGroupsTalkZeitgeist
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.
Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Putting alignment in golf : a laser based…
Loading...

Putting alignment in golf : a laser based evaluation,

by A.D. Potts

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingConversations
113,689,591NoneNone
Recently added bygeoffmangum

No tags.

None.

None
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

A study by Potts & Roach entitled, "Putting Alignment in Golf: A Laser Based Evaluation" found that all golfers misalign their putters. On a 6 foot straight putt, novice, 12 - 24 handicappers and 2 - 11 handicappers, misaligned outside the hole 12%, 2% and 2% of the time respectively. On a 12 foot straight putt, the same golfers misaligned 71%, 40% and 43%, respectively. On a 12 foot putt, when the golfers used a "foreshortened target" between their ball and the hole to aim at, there misalignment decreased significantly to, 59%, 36% and 32%, repectively.

http://probablegolfinstruction.com/putting_alignment.htm

It's actually worse than this, in general. The testing protocol is probably tainted in the Potts and Roach study, as researchers seldom know much about how the brain uses ANY environmental cues to orient to a proposed goal / task. In neuroscience, and especially experimental investigations of brain processes using sensitive (time / space resolution) imaging technology, great care must be taken NOT to taint the data with extraneous or tainting influences. Motor sports science research is generally pretty mickey mouse when it comes to this sort of thing. Even in basic psychometrics studies, the same level of care to avoid "helpful" cues in the environment is taken, and even more is really needed to get good data.
  geoffmangum | Sep 20, 2011 |
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Series (with order)
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Awards and honors
Epigraph
Dedication
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Publisher series
Original language

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English

None

Book description
Haiku summary

No descriptions found.

No library descriptions found.

Quick Links

Popular covers

None

Rating

Average: No ratings.

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 127,175,243 books! | Top bar: Always visible