Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

The Dissident by Nell Freudenberger

The Dissident (2006)

by Nell Freudenberger

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
2481046,284 (3.35)10



Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

» See also 10 mentions

Showing 1-5 of 10 (next | show all)
A book with a few good moments and an interesting 1st person narrative about the history of avant-garde artists in communist China, but that ultimately builds to a climax that leaves the reader wondering, "Really? That's what it was all about?" Very disappointing.

It's obvious Freudenberger spent all her time researching and developing the character of the Dissident himself, as anything dealing directly with his past is quite interesting and compelling. Ironically, though, all the American characters, whose lives and culture Freudenberger should be fully conversant in, read like reject cliches from the film American Beauty. They are so bad and one-dimensional, in fact, that even the Dissident's character begins to suffer and flatten out any time he comes into contact with them, which, sadly, comprises half the book.

Recommendation: Read all the 1st person PoV chapters. Leave the rest alone. ( )
  dgmillo | Jun 2, 2013 |
Excellent writing, appealing characters (especially Cece, for no reason I could put my finger on), an inventive twist, a convincing setting: this is a very good novel by a talented author. The narration swaps back and forth between first person (the eponymous dissident) and third limited (Cece, her sister-in-law Joan, her brother-in-law Phil), which I found slightly jarring at first but fine once I recognized the pattern.


...we didn't want to know the truth about each others' situations. We wanted to imagine that paradise existed just outside the gates of our own lives. (52)

They couldn't stand to fail. Even to succeed wasn't enough, if the success wasn't spectacular. (98)

However, there are various types of lies: an outright attempt to deceive another person is different from a story that feels true, and only needs to be translated into another form to be understood. (114)

...if you are a hider, you have to be careful of seekers, who are drawn to you simply for the challenge of discovering something. But of course, hiders are drawn to seekers too; there is always some part of us that yearns to be found out. (119)

Maybe the compromises were different, but culture shock could only last so long. At some point, you had to stop being shocked and start absorbing it; otherwise, you would all stay strangers forever. (245)

"Maybe in a foreign language we can never say exactly what we mean..." (277)

I was sorry that I hadn't spent my whole life trying to become the kind of person she'd admire. (294)

I imagine that's something celebrities have to contend with all the time: their fans have an unshakable impression of them before they've even met them. Even if the reality doesn't conform to those expectations, a true devotee won't be disappointed by the discrepancies. He simply won't see them. (303)

Relationships were never equivalent: that was why it was so hard to find permanent ones. When two people depended on each other, they each had their own reasons. Sometimes the reasons balanced each other out temporarily, and the two of you were suspended gently in air. (376)

How could you ever know the truth if each successive person translated it into a new vocabulary? (395) ( )
  JennyArch | Apr 3, 2013 |
The dissident in question is a controversial Chinese artist, who comes to California on an exchange programme, living with a local family and giving art classes at a girls' school during his stay. But the story is at least as much about the family he stays with, well-off but dysfunctional, and their extended circle. Despite the differences in their backgrounds, many of the same themes run through both halves of the story - art, creation and fakery, the closeness and simultaneous tension of family relationships, intergenerational misunderstandings, reality and image, and the role of chance in defining your life.

At the same time, the story is not at all heavy - it's very readable, and funny. The use of language to differentiate the characters is another delight - the prissy, short-story writing older sister is very precise and hates cliche, the dissident speaks precise but slightly formal and long-winded sentences. This lifts the story and stops it being dominated by its symbology - for example, the father of the family could be a real stereotype, the psychology professor who has no idea how to interact with his wife or children, but he is drawn with accuracy, economy and wit.

The only fault, for me, was the final chapter, which tried to tie up at least a couple of loose ends, but felt like a cop-out - a tacked-on happy ending which didn't follow on from what came before. But as that was only the last three pages, I only docked it half a point. ( )
1 vote wandering_star | Jul 19, 2010 |
A Chinese artist associated with the radical "East Village" movement comes to LA to exhibit and teach at a girls' private school, while staying with a Beverly Hills family. The book is over 400 pages, yet the characters and plotlines are not all fully developed. ( )
  ennie | Dec 28, 2009 |
(Reprinted from the Chicago Center for Literature and Photography [cclapcenter.com]. I am the original author of this essay, as well as the owner of CCLaP; it is not being reprinted here illegally.)

(Today's review is chock-full of spoilers, for reasons that will become obvious; those who are planning on reading the book themselves would be well-advised to skip this essay altogether until after finishing the novel. For a quick idea of what I thought of the book, please see the first two spoiler-free paragraphs.)

With the 2008 Beijing Olympics just around the corner, there's never been a better time to revisit the subject of Communist China, and especially of the ways that artists are treated under such a system. After all, as with many other subjects, China and the US have dealt with young subversive artists in very different ways over the decades, with quite different results as well: the Communists, for example, for the most part tend to jail and/or kill such artists, making their power to persuade simply grow that much more; while those in charge in America over the decades have tended to co-opt these artists instead, using their cutting-edge messages to sell more hamburgers, and paying these artists obscene amounts of money in order to keep their mouths shut over the entire thing.

So you would think, then, that a book bringing these two worlds clashing together, like short-story veteran Nell Freudenberger does in her first novel The Dissident, would be a delicious affair indeed, a story that would have a lot to say about how difficult it is to pull off truly challenging artistic projects in a consumerist society; and in fact, Freudenberger's novel starts with some truly great characters finding themselves in some truly compelling situations, an environment where all kinds of fascinating conclusions could be drawn under the right hands. Ah, but then Freudenberger unfortunately pisses the entire thing away, taking some of these premises and doing nothing with them, taking others and concentrating on the absolutely least interesting thing about them. It is an infinitely disappointing book, it's my sad duty to report, a much bigger travesty than a novel that's simply bad; because in this case the book is actually good at first, something that could've ranked with the best of Jonathan Franzen if it had been handled right, but by the end achieves the kind of ponderous monotony of a typical 19-year-old's writing exercise in an English 114 class, something that will have most intelligent people scratching their heads and saying, "Seriously, you don't have anything better to say about such a fascinating subject than that?"

The Dissident basically tells two stories at once: the first being the story of Yuan Zhao, a young radical Chinese artist caught up in the momentous affairs of the so-called Student Revolution of the late '80s and early '90s. Except that he's not actually a radical artist, see; he's actually the younger cousin of one of the radical artists, a traditional nature illustrator who just happened to have been hanging out with his cousin and friends in that time period, who is guilty of a heavy form of hero worship which is why he found himself as a bit player in the group's various illegal performance-art projects at the time. It's during one of these elaborately silly projects, in fact, that the group meets Chinese-American art professor Harry Lin, who half a decade later ends up securing the means to bring one of these artists over to UCLA for a year; but instead of sending one of the actual cutting-edge artists, the group decides that it would be a great performance piece unto itself to send Zhao instead, and to pass him off as the wildest and most radical of all of them. And thus does Zhao land with a thud in the middle of suburban Los Angeles, staying in the poolhouse of the wealthy Travers family, accepting a job as an art teacher at their daughter's private high school while also being expected to have a show of new America-influenced radical work finished by the following May.

And this is no ordinary wealthy patron family either, mind you: turns out, for example, that the fortysomething wife Cece, married to stuffy psychiatrist Gordon, years ago had an affair with Gordon's aimless playwright brother Phil, which apparently was never successfully resolved. And not only that, but that Phil wrote an autobiographical play about the entire thing, that was supposed to be an obscure off-Broadway production until being randomly caught one night by a Drew-Barrymore-type woman, a former child actor who now produces edgy Hollywood dramas, and who has optioned the play for a million bucks and is in the process of turning it into a major motion picture, with neither Cece nor Gordon aware yet of what the play is actually about. And meanwhile, there is their sister Joan, a frustrated novelist who has long-suspected that an affair took place, and is thinking of writing a book herself on the subject, who as well develops a crush on the "dissident" the book is named after. And this is not even mentioning the Traverses' two teenage kids, one of whom is a budding modern dancer rapidly developing an eating disorder, the other a sullen alternative-comics artist who was recently discovered pawning his stereo so he could buy a handgun, for reasons no one in the family is quite sure of.

Yeah, I know, it sounds like a great concept for a witty comedy of manners, as well as a chance to make some devastating observations about the worth of art in a Capitalist versus Communist society. But like I said, the premise of The Dissident is as good as the book gets, with the story slipping downwards with each additional word Freudenberger commits to the page. For example, that confessional play that we think is going to lead to all kinds of family problems? Turns out that the daring actress has hired a couple of young script doctors to "punch it up," who end up turning it into the story of a cult leader in Long Island, basically ruining whatever potential family conflict that existed in the first place. And far from being angry or disappointed by this bastardization of his work, Phil instead enthusiastically agrees to the radical changes, thrilled for some perplexing reason to be hanging out with two goofy white kids twenty years younger than himself, who spend their days playing videogames and listening to gangster rap. And not only that, but the production itself ends up getting cancelled altogether in the development phase, completely ending whatever little dramatic tension that was left in the first place. And not only that, but the entirety of what I just related gets told over the course of two chapters, and then is never mentioned or even referred to again, leading one to wonder why Freudenberger bothered introducing the subplot to begin with.

UGH! The entire book is like this, to tell you the sad truth, just an endless series of great premises that go nowhere, just nowhere at all; Cece and Phil never resume their affair, Joan never writes her novel, Zhao never takes the slightest interest in her, we never learn why the son bought a gun in the first place. The entire thing, in fact, becomes an aimless, meandering mess very quickly, a quagmire of ennui that will have you angrily flipping the pages faster and faster, desperate to get to something that's of the least bit of interest, resenting both Freudenberger and HarperCollins more and more with each page for releasing such dreck in the first place. I mean, even the conflict regarding Zhao being a traditional artist instead of a radical one goes nowhere, which is almost the biggest shame of all; because it would've been so easy to make something entertaining out of that premise, in that the clueless wealthy Caucasians Zhao is surrounded by are just so eager to assign overly complicated rationales to every little thing Zhao does, from his clothing to his off-handed remarks around the dinner table.

For example, why not have Zhao experience a fit of remorse and confess the entire scam to his hosts, just to have the hosts mistake the confession for an elaborate postmodern performance piece unto itself? Why not have Zhao simply release his traditional work accompanied by one of those snotty incomprehensible "mission statements" that American conceptual artists have gotten so good at, turning the entire thing into the exact radical work Zhao thinks he's unable to pull off? Here, Freudenberger, I'll write one for you right off the top of my head: "My plagiarism of a traditional Chinese nature scroll is a comment on the consumer-based culture of the Los Angeles area, and of the lack of awareness found in most of its inhabitants towards the real events of the Chinese arts community of the 1990s. In a society where such radical work is easily packaged into a disposable consumer good, the only logical response we can have is to revert to an age of sacred objects and an emphasis on the representational wandering gaze." See, that wasn't so hard!

Even with all this, though, I still haven't gotten to the worst thing about The Dissident; no, the worst thing about this book is that over half of it takes place back in Beijing in flashback form, with Zhao painting us a picture of what it was like to be a radical student artist in those days. And look, I admit that it's always a great thing when a society's youth can step out from under the steel boot of cultural oppression, and finally for the first time start making art that openly challenges societal norms; but as anyone who's studied art history can tell you, what this usually means in such situations is a group of artists endlessly debating cultural questions for the first time that we in the West already came up with answers for decades ago, and that are usually associated anymore with spoiled stoned college students sitting around a dorm room and blowing off their classes. Like, here's a typical question that Freudenberger devotes dozens and dozens of pages to exploring within the chapters set in China -- "If a photograph is made of an ephemeral performance piece, does the photo itself become its own piece of art? And if so, is that photographer ethically obliged to share whatever revenue that photo generates with the original performers in question?" And the answers: "Yes; no; and will you please f---ing get off the subject now, you stupid undergraduates, because YOU ARE BORING THE SH-T OUT OF ME!"

I get what Freudenberger is trying to do, and agree that it's an important point to get across in such a story, that these kinds of debates are important for artists to have within an oppressive society that usually doesn't allow such debates; but man, a little of this goes a long, long way, especially when concentrating as Freudenberger does on an artistic medium (conceptual performance art) that most intelligent people in the West were already making fun of 25 years ago, and is now mostly considered a sign of everything that went wrong with the art scene in those years, not what is daring and right. It's hard enough for me to care about a bunch of naked 21-year-olds hanging upside-down from crosses while rotten fish are smeared over their bodies, something that makes me want to just roll my eyes and slap all the pretentious asses who are taking it seriously; much less 200 damn pages of it.

I'm willing to cut Freudenberger a little slack when it comes to her overall career -- after all, she's the past winner of several literary awards, and no less an author than Richard Ford (who I'm a big fan of) has called her "a truly prodigious talent." But let's face it, The Dissident in particular is a stinker of a book, even more so than normal precisely because of having such a great beginning. For now, I think Freudenberger needs to stick with the short stories which is where she garnered such praise in the first place, and leave the novels to those who actually know how to develop a compelling long-form narrative. The Dissident is a noble failure to be sure, but a failure nonetheless, and a dismal one at that.

Out of 10: 3.6 ( )
1 vote jasonpettus | Oct 31, 2009 |
Showing 1-5 of 10 (next | show all)
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Series (with order)
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Awards and honors
First words
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Publisher series
Original language

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English (1)

Book description
Haiku summary

Amazon.com Product Description (ISBN 0060758716, Hardcover)

From the PEN/Malamud Award-winning author of Lucky Girls comes an intricately woven novel about secrets, love, art, identity, and the shining chaos of every day American life.

Yuan Zhao, a celebrated Chinese performance artist and political dissident, has accepted a one-year artist's residency in Los Angeles. He is to be a Visiting Scholar at the St. Anselm's School for Girls, teaching advanced art, and hosted by one of the school's most devoted families: the wealthy if dysfunctional Traverses. The Traverses are too preoccupied with their own problems to pay their foreign guest too much attention, and the dissident is delighted to be left alone—his past links with radical movements give him good reason to avoid careful scrutiny. The trouble starts when he and his American hosts begin to view one another with clearer eyes.

(retrieved from Amazon Thu, 12 Mar 2015 17:59:38 -0400)

(see all 3 descriptions)

"Yuan Zhao, a celebrated Chinese performance artist and political dissident, has accepted a one year's artist's residency in Los Angeles. He is to be a Visiting Scholar at the St. Anselm's School for Girls, teaching advanced art, and hosted by one of the school's most devoted families: the wealthy if dysfunctional Traverses. But when their guest arrives, the Traverses are preoccupied with their own problems. Cece - devoted mother and contemporary art enthusiast - worries about the recent arrest of her son, Max. Unable to communicate with her husband, Gordon, a psychiatrist distracted by his passion for genealogical research, she turns to Gordon's wayward brother, Phil. Meanwhile, seventeen-year-old Olivia Travers is just relieved that her classmates seem to be ignoring the weird Chinese art teacher living in her pool house - at least until a brilliant but troublesome new student appears in his class." "The dissident, for his part, is delighted to be left alone. His relationship to the 1989 Democracy Movement and his past in a Beijing underground artists' community together give him reason for not wanting to be scrutinized too carefully. The trouble starts when he and his American hosts begin to see one another with clearer eyes."--BOOK JACKET.… (more)

Quick Links

Swap Ebooks Audio
3 avail.
15 wanted
1 pay

Popular covers


Average: (3.35)
1 4
2 2
2.5 3
3 22
3.5 7
4 13
4.5 4
5 5

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.


You are using the new servers! | About | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 117,110,826 books! | Top bar: Always visible