HomeGroupsTalkZeitgeist
Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

A Nomad of the Time Streams by Michael…
Loading...
MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
5381018,671 (3.83)12

None.

Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

» See also 12 mentions

Showing 1-5 of 10 (next | show all)
Eisenhower is reported to have said privately: “Before the bomb was used, I would have said yes, I was sure we could keep the peace with Russia. Now, I don’t know. Until now I would have said that we three, Britain with her mighty fleet, America with the strongest air force, and Russia with the strongest land force on the continent, we three could have guaranteed the peace of the world for a long, long time to come. But now, I don’t know. People are frightened and disturbed all over. Everyone feels insecure again.”

The Nomad of Time is a book club omnibus of Michael Moorcock's three Oswald Bastable novels. These books first published in the 1970s are sometimes characterized as seminal steampunk, on account of their re-imagining of the technological development of the early 20th century, the conspicuous presence of airships, and the Edwardian character of the protagonist. (Bastable's name is borrowed from that of a child narrator in several Victorian books by E. Nesbit.) Each of the three novels presents a variant of 20th-century history, in which geopolitical and technological conditions vary. In all, however, Bastable finds himself near the center of critical events concerning global warfare, and he comes to feel a considerable guilty responsibility for his role, although he is more victim than perpetrator.

Although the titles may evoke Edgar Rice Burroughs, if these books contain pastiche or homage to another author, it is certainly H.G. Wells, for both the scientific and political elements as well as the period setting. There is a documentary conceit established in The Warlord of the Air, according to which Bastable was an acquaintance of Moorcock's grandfather, and the first two novels are simply presentations of text found among the papers of the older Moorcock's estate. The third novel purports to be a Bastable manuscript delivered directly to grandson Michael through a more fantastic agency.

In this series, Moorcock gives actual historical personalities new roles in the variant histories that he presents. For instance, in The Land Leviathan Mahatma Gandhi features as the president of the idyllic South African republic of Bantustan. The "Steel Tsar" of the third book is (unsurprisingly) an otherworld variant of Stalin, while Lenin has a cameo in the first. The Ukranian revolutionary Nestor Makhno is conscripted to serve as a mouthpiece for some of Moorcock's own Kropotkin-inflected political views toward the close of the third book. The 20th-century event that seems to have the greatest metaphysical significance in The Nomad of Time is the first detonation of a nuclear fission bomb. In fact, the atomic bomb is to this trilogy pretty much what the Death Star is to the original Star Wars trilogy, although Moorcock's political sensibilities are quite different than those of George Lucas!

Bastable connects with Moorcock's Eternal Champion hyperwork primarily through some incidental appearances in the Jerry Cornelius stories and the End of Time books. But the only intruder from Moorcock's fantasy multiverse in The Nomad of Time is Temporal Adventurer Una Persson, who figures in all three of the Bastable books. There is one solitary mention of the dialectic of Law and Chaos in the third Bastable novel, but throughout the three, the forces of Empire and Revolution seem to be the masks worn by Moorcock's cosmic polarity. Bastable is a professedly non-introspective character, a dogged survivor who prefers to be in the role of a man of action, but the books brim with moral anxiety and confused loyalties.
4 vote paradoxosalpha | Aug 19, 2016 |
My reactions to reading this omnibus in 1999. Spoilers follow.

“Introduction” -- An interesting introduction in which Moorcock states the three Oswald Bastable novels in this book deal with themes of imperialism and ‘racialism” as well as being a homage to admired pre-WWI British writers: Amongst those writers, Moorcock includes William Morris, George Bernard Shaw, and H. G. Wells. While Moorcock admires socialism but not their particular type, he regards “paternalism and centralism” the bane of socialism, and he thinks some on the left guilty of them. Moorcock has an unclear line about “ … their social solutions, however well-meant, however they hoped to achieve the millennium, to give self-respect to 'minorities' and the poor were always doomed while they kept to their prescriptions.” Is this Moorcock’s way of phrasing the criticisms of conservatives that leftists have a “murderous drive for utopia”? I suspect he’s just disagreeing with their policies for utopia. Moorcock, inexplicably, views paternalism and democracy as incompatible. (They seem quite compatible in modern America.) He decries “laissez-faire capitalism” as not being real equality under the law. Somehow, he thinks America (I’m assuming he intends this for an American and, possibly, British audience since this is an American edition, and he resides in America) does not guarantee equal voice, equal access (he may have a point here) and equal responsibility (seemingly, I believe, at odds with socialism). He then has another odd line about the “democratic infrastructure” being under attacked by various quarters in the guise of freedom by things like the telephone company, porn videos, and choice of washing powder. (These are his actual examples, and I don’t understand their significance except for the porn – he’s an admirer of Andrea Dworkin.)

The Warlord of the Air -- I liked this adventure set in an alternate history where history seems to have taken an alternate path about the time of the Boer War which, here, only lasted about six months. Oswald Bastable, narrator and hero of the story (the framing conceit is that Moorcock’s grandfather, Michael Moorcock, meets Bastable in 1903 and writes the story down), Captain in the British army, is magically and mysteriously transported to an alternate timeline, circa 1973, during a show-the-flag expedition to the small Himalayan kingdom of Kumbalar. There in the ancient, mazelike palace, Bastable is transported to another universe where lack of two world wars has kept colonialism (practiced by the usual suspects of England, France, Italy, Russia, Germany, Japan, and a US that denies it has an empire, just a “Greater American Commonwealth”). It’s a world of wonderfully developed airships, clean cities, women's’ suffrage, and, compared to his 1902, improved standard of living. Part of the attraction of alternate histories is the encounter with alternate historical personages. (And, with Moorcock, alternate versions of the personalities found in his Eternal Champion cycle. Here we meet the usually unpredictable scoundrel Captain Quelch as a nice airship captain that Bastable s fond of. Von Bek shows up here as an anarchist.). Ronald Reagan (at least a “Reagan”, no first name given) gets Bastable kicked out of the Special Air Police. (I suspect, given that this novel seems to have been written in 1971, that this incident was a revision for this edition.). Bastable, disgraced, falls in with a band of anarchists that includes von Bek, Una Persson, and the Nemo-like Captain Korzeniowski. Bastable thinks the imperial world of this alternate 1973 is a utopia until these anarchists show him the repression of the colonized people, economic trade arrangements that exploit them, and the indoctrination of the natives which leads them to believe this all just, inevitable, and an improvement. Bastable meets an alternate historical personage, Vladmir Ilyitch Ulianov (Lenin in our timeline) who is an exile from a democratic Russia that never suffered a violent revolution. It is here the book starts becoming ambiguous in its politics. Ulianov comes across as a man hoping for a miserable proletariat so they will incite revolution. General OT Shaw, a Chinese warlord, is sort of a Vernian figure, think Robur, who has constructed sort of a high tech, anarchist utopia in China. Allegedly, the freedom he offers attracts many brilliant scientists from other countries to build advanced weapons including a nuke. Totalitarian countries, in our world, never seem to have trouble finding scientists for such projects. Bastable argues with Ulianov (and Shaw agrees with him) that the revolution is better motivated by hope rather than misery. He also argues that a quest for a perfect utopia can never be resolved permanently, that imperfection will always exist in the world, that justice can be achieved by small individual acts as well large abstractions. Given the remarks in the introduction to this omnibus, Bastable seems to speak for Moorcock. I get the impression that we are to find fault with Ulianov (and, perhaps, Shaw) but neither one really argues with Bastable and they don’t seem guilty of these crimes. Not guilty, at least, until the end when Shaw sends Bastable on a mission to nuke Hirsohima via airship, a job which horrifies Bastable (and is clearly to horrify us). The efforts of Shaw and the anarchists lead to, eventually, war between the Great Powers – or so one British character, part of an international expedition to crush Shaw, tells Bastable (then allied with Shaw). Bastable replies that war should have come a long time ago between the powers, that only its absence kept their empires intact. This adds some poignancy to the note at novel’s end that presenter Michael Moorcock died in World War One.

The Land Leviathan -- This novel, like The Warlord of the Air, is a good combination of adventure novel and political commentary. The novel, in its technology (though the novel is unconvincing in that it's doubtful this world’s technology would create the weapons – particularly the Land Leviathan which reminded me of some of Hitler’s impractical superweapons both deployed and undeployed – depicted or tactically use them as shown), reminded me of Edgar Rice Burroughs’ Pellucidar series with its digging machines and H. G. Wells’ “The Land Ironclads” with its huge tanks. There is something charming in a world which has taken Victorian technology to such limits. Politically, the novel is clearly about racism. Bastable finds himself in an alternate 1904 world being torn apart and thrust back into barbarism by war. In this world, a brilliant Chilean invented all sorts of technology (wireless transmission of electricity, improved steam engines that don’t use water, burrowing machines, tank, etc) which lead to a rich and prosperous world. However, Moorcock makes a valid point here forgotten by leftists and pacificists who think strife and warfare come from material want. The generation that initially experiences the introduction of these technologies is grateful for the wealth they produce and is willing to live in the status quo (including being imperial subjects). But their children are not satisfied with mere wealth, and a wave of nationalism and independence movements result. Colonial empires fall and the world goes to a brutal war which Bastable enters, encountering a doomed batch of British soldiers in Afghanistan. (Literarily, the novel opens with Michael Moorcock (narrator of the frame of the earlier The Warlord of the Air) going to search for Democratic Dawn City (Shaw’s utopia in the earlier novel) and Bastable. He finds Una Persson who mysteriously disappears. Bastable wonders through a blasted world – rescuing Una Persson, meeting Captain Korzeniowski (in this novel, a Polish sub commander gone pirate). Bastable and the later (after a respite for Bastable in relatively undamaged Scotland) go to the sane country of Bantustan. There things are prosperous, racial harmony is the norm, and foreign policy covertly pacifist (President Gandhi only maintains a military as a bluff). But the central theme of this novel is an examination of racism in the character of Cicero Hood aka the Black Attila, a well-educated American black who has taken advantage of the global chaos to found a racist empire in Africa, then Europe, and, finally, a vengeful return to America. This is an accomplished with the aid of his friend (and, possibly, lover – this is never explained fully) Una Persson. The Black Attila coerces Bastable into joining him (Hood admires Bastable and respects him, though he is white, for rescuing Persson in England) to observe the invasion of America. Bastable finds out that some of Hood’s atrocities have been exaggerated (by Hood himself to cow whites into surrender), that Hood admires Bantustan but believes it is a unique setup due to the uniqueness of Gandhi, that Hood believes his brutal empire must conquer whites to not only redress past grievances but give blacks self-esteem, a sense of accomplishment. Bastable admits whites have mistreated blacks for centuries (including the brutal Americans – Joe Kennedy leads the resistance in Washington, DC), but he is uneasy at Hood’s glee at destroying his boyhood haunts, his refusal to accept what he scornfully calls western notions of equality and mercy to enemies who, in a reversed situation, would not reciprocate. In his Black Ashanti Empire, whites will be tolerated but must earn their rights, children will suffer for their parents’ sins. Bastable is troubled by Hood’s regime though he admits, like William the Conqueror, Hood brings a brutal, fair-mindedness and justice and order. It’s in this novel Bastable begins to suspect Fate has chosen him to witness the battle between Chaos and Order (though, unlike many Eternal Champions, he seems more an observer than a participant in these wars. Una Persson refers to him, when speaking to Moorcock, as a “nomad of the timestreams”. For his part, Bastable begins to suspect that Persson deliberately and knowingly travels between timestreams and that he is not just meeting echoes of her.

The Steel Tsar -- This novel is interesting for not only being a thematic wrapup of the Bastable trilogy, but also for how it varies literarily from the others and develops Moorcock’s multiverse. The Steel Tsar of the title is an alternate version of Stalin, here a messianic leader of a Cossack independence revolutionary movement against Kerensky’s socialist Russian state. The political thought Moorcock attacks here, as implied in the omnibus introduction, is centralism and, more broadly, messianic political movements. (Shaw orders Hiroshima’s destruction in The Warlord of the Air. And Bastable is uncomfortable with the Black Attila of The Land Leviathan.) The novel opens with a delightful framing device of Michael Moorcock, the author and not (as in the first two novels) his grandfather. He meets, in 1979, Una Persson who hands him another Bastable memoir, this plagued by the amnesia common to most travelers across timestreams. Moorcock admits that his references to Bastable in The Dancers at the End of Time are “highly speculative”. Persson, it turns out, is a member of the League of Temporal Adventurers who travel throughout time and universes. Bastable has been recruited by her. Persson wittily remarks that she counts on Moorcock’s “strange imagination” to obscure her and Bastable’s stories enough not to upset the timeflow. In this novel, Bastable is inexplicably carried to an alternate universe of 1941 where world war has broken out. Bastable is peculiarly passive through a lot of this book, spending a lot of time as a virtual or real prisoner of various groups. (It is a world where the turning point seems to have been a American Civil War in which England helped the Confederacy, thereby creating two nations – both of which, eventually, provide equality to blacks. England develops a larger Empire that includes holdings in Central and South America. France never recovered from the Franco-Prussian war. Germany absorbed most of their empire. The Austro-Hungarian Empire is decaying. The Ottoman Empire is stronger than our world. Russian and Japan have Empires.) Most of the multiverse characters are here from the other two novels: Begg, a Captain Korzeniowski, and Una Persson. Bastable waxes philosophic here, and the novel deals with some of our moral responsibility to each other, ourselves, and history. “Human idealism … human impatience … human despair” produce our wars – including aspirations to utopia. Moorcock wisely notes that the same personal characteristics can lead to good or ill depending on the context. Stalin here is as brutal as in our world, a man who uses social aspirations as a lever to personal power. (It is unexplained exactly why Bastable’s nuking of Hiroshima has upset the multiverse.) Persson notes that our delusions, ideas, assumptions, and acts make us all parties in great evils. But we also have the responsibility to act for justice. We are also all victims to allowing leaders to take our moral responsibility which we must never delegate. “Security”, notes Persson, is never permanent and always hard-won. (I liked the novel's end where many of the characters, including the Steel Tsar, seemed to be aware their character was acting in similar dramas in many universes.) That justice, claims Persson, is rooted in an egalitarianism of equal power. Only democracy stands between us and chaos. I didn’t find all the metaphysics of the multiverse clear, nor Moorcock’s political thoughts explicit enough, but, like his Blood trilogy, I liked the ride. ( )
1 vote RandyStafford | Sep 29, 2013 |
More philosophical and less pulpy than the previous volume, it manages to be simultaneously better-crafted and less interesting. While the look at three different ways the twentieth century might have gone differently is a a good conceit, in practice it's rather repetitious and not all that profound, particularly since, in order to have airships, technology had to take a very similar direction in all three.

It's not bad, but it's not my favorite (which honor still belongs to Von Bek, I believe.) ( )
  JeremyPreacher | Mar 30, 2013 |
The Warlord of the Air: http://www.librarything.com/review/26985516
The Land Leviathan: http://www.librarything.com/review/7174287
The Steel Tsar: http://www.librarything.com/review/85190334

Man. This series was humbling. If it taught me anything, it's that my knowledge of early 20th century history is severely lacking. I'm absolutely certain that there were many instances of real personages of note playing roles in these stories that simply flew past me. The only reason that I figured out Stalin was because Moorcock took pity on me and laid it out plain at the very end of the book - otherwise, I never would have figured it out. And that is pretty sad.

In terms of this series as part of the Eternal Champion saga, I was not particularly impressed. We had the time shifting and the reality shifting - but not the identity shifting. Nor was Bastable plagued by memories of other champions. Additionally, unlike Elric or Erekose or Hawkmoon - Bastable was present at monumentous events, but not necessarily acting to make those events come to pass. He was more like a bit player than the star.

On the plus side, I really enjoyed the fun that Moorcock had with 20th century personalities in the multiverse - so many options that make just enough sense that they're compelling or funny or sadly accurate. ( )
  helver | Apr 7, 2012 |
It's hard to imagine steampunk alternative history being done better than the story of Captain Oswald Bastable, 53rd British Lancers, who escapes treachery in a Tibetan monastery in the year 1902 only to emerge in an alternate timestream in 1974, from which he begins searching for a way home. The novels work on the level of pulp steampunk, with dramatic air and land battles; and as puzzles, as the reader recognizes characters that are alternate versions of real-world figures (Joseph Conrad; Gandhi; Joseph Kennedy). But most impressively, under the churning story, the books work as a meditation on human civilization and violence. Every world he enters has technological marvels and also tragic, pointless war on an ever-increasing scale. Bastable starts as a chauvinist and racist; over the course of the novels, he grows in plausible fits and starts.

The first two books in the series, the Warlord of the Air (1971) and the Land Leviathan (1974), are pitch-perfect. The style of last book, the Steel Tsar (1981) begins to move in another direction -- darker and more raw, with less Edwardian color. That makes sense within the story, as the narrative has ostensibly been edited by Michael Moorcock himself, rather than his grandfather; but it also feels as though Moorcock had lost interest in the original project by the time he wrote the last book. Nonetheless, the plot hums, and the ultimate resolution makes (some) sense of all three novels. ( )
1 vote bezoar44 | Feb 22, 2012 |
Showing 1-5 of 10 (next | show all)
no reviews | add a review

» Add other authors (9 possible)

Author nameRoleType of authorWork?Status
Michael Moorcockprimary authorall editionscalculated
Labitzke;, FredCover artistsecondary authorsome editionsconfirmed

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English (1)

Book description
The Warlord of the Air, The Land Leviathan, The Steel Tsar
Haiku summary

Amazon.com Product Description (ISBN 0586061355, Paperback)

Strange worlds occupy the infinite multiverse. They are worlds very much like the Earth we know--worlds that but for a vew differences could be our own. Visit an Earth where historical fact is turned on its head; slavery remains a practice in the United States. This is the fourth volume in the epic. Includes The Warlord of the Air, The Land Leviathan, and The Steel Tsar.

(retrieved from Amazon Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:09:21 -0400)

(see all 2 descriptions)

No library descriptions found.

Quick Links

Swap Ebooks Audio
1 avail.
25 wanted
1 pay

Popular covers

Rating

Average: (3.83)
0.5
1 1
1.5
2 4
2.5
3 13
3.5 9
4 31
4.5 5
5 13

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

You are using the new servers! | About | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 116,046,621 books! | Top bar: Always visible