Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

The Electoral College Primer 2000 by…

The Electoral College Primer 2000

by Lawrence D. Longley

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingConversations
102880,191 (3.33)None



Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

Showing 2 of 2
A chillingly prescient analysis of how the Electoral College could pervert the voting American public, and a cogent explanation of what the founding fathers had in mind when they created the electoral system. The statistics are necessarily dry, but the analysis is dead on... ( )
  kimsbooks | Mar 15, 2008 |
although it was written after (and partly to explain) Bush v. Gore, this is the best book I've seen that talks about why this country uses an electoral college to choose the president. the authors put out a new edition after every presidental race, it seems. solid research material and a good read, if you're into U.S. politics ( )
  beau.p.laurence | Jul 23, 2006 |
Showing 2 of 2
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Series (with order)
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Awards and honors
First words
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Publisher series
Original language

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English (2)

Book description
Haiku summary

Amazon.com Amazon.com Review (ISBN 0300080360, Paperback)

"One man, one vote" may be a familiar democratic motto, but it hardly applies to American presidential elections. That's because of the United States' bizarre electoral college system, which makes it possible for candidates who finish second in the popular vote to triumph in the electoral count. In fact, this has happened at least twice (1876 and 1888). On two other occasions (1800 and 1824), the House of Representatives picked the president when nobody won an electoral-college majority. Thomas Jefferson once described this circumstance as "the most dangerous blot on our Constitution." In the brief but comprehensive Electoral College Primer 2000, Lawrence D. Longley and Neal R. Peirce show why Jefferson's assessment was right on target. They have a keen understanding of the electoral college's vulnerabilities. Through a few simple calculations, for example, they show that Californians have more than two-and-a-half times the voting power of Montana residents. More alarming, however, they describe how a small shift in the popular vote can enact a huge change in the electoral college outcome. They count 22 "hairbreadth elections" in American history, including the 1960 race between John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon--if 8,971 votes in Illinois and Missouri had switched from Kennedy to Nixon that year, the result would have been an electoral college deadlock. It's amazing the system has held up as well as it has over the years; Longley and Peirce persuasively argue that it's only a matter of time before it breaks down completely. --John J. Miller

(retrieved from Amazon Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:17:46 -0400)

No library descriptions found.

Quick Links

Swap Ebooks Audio
2 avail.

Popular covers


Average: (3.33)
2 1
3 1
5 1

Yale University Press

2 editions of this book were published by Yale University Press.

Editions: 0300080360, 0300080352

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.


About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 120,833,293 books! | Top bar: Always visible