Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

The Science Delusion: Freeing the Spirit of…

The Science Delusion: Freeing the Spirit of Enquiry (2012)

by Rupert Sheldrake

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
89None136,376 (4.59)5



Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

» See also 5 mentions

Showing 5 of 5
When I first read the ten paradigms Sheldrake examined I realized that I held most of those very reductionist views that Sheldrake criticized without realizing it. At least now I know better what is at stake and I see how to move on and get out of the mental box I didn't even know I was in. ( )
  YesNoMaybe | Feb 22, 2014 |
This book offers a clear exposition of ten of the leading arguments for moving beyond the paradigm of reductionist materialism upon which most scientific experimentation and theory is currently grounded. While Sheldrake does not spend all that much of the book setting forth his hypothesis of morphological fields, he does say enough regarding the relationship of his theory to the philosophy of A. N. Whitehead and the findings of contemporary quantum physics for a lay reader such as myself to grasp - without having read much of his other works - what he is proposing as an alternative explanation of reality. (For a taste of what he is talking about in regard to morphological field theory, one can get sufficient insight by listening to some of his talks and debates on You Tube. But be forewarned there is still little tolerance for Sheldrake's theories among orthodox Darwinian biologists despite the fairly extensive experimental evidence that he has provided. . ( )
  Jotto | Sep 7, 2013 |
I picked up this book in it's British edition, "The Science Delusion". Not so much the idea of Rupert Sheldrake, it's author, rather his publishers, as a marketing tactic, positioning against Richard Dawkins' "The God Delusion". Sheldrake isn't interested in being in your face confrontational, and make no mistake, he is a believer in the scientific method, as a practicing scientist himself. His issue is dogmatic scientism and the tendency of the institutions that work in the name of science to become every bit as dogmatic and close minded as the religious institutions the Dawkins of the world rail against. He also warns against the idea that science, as it stands now, has "it all figured out" and now it's just filling in the details, pointing out this is not the first time by a long shot this has happened in the history of discovery. Many of those who practice science want to see the universe as a puzzle they are putting the pieces in and want to believe they are about to solve it, rather than just seeing it as a huge mystery that produces a new paradigm shift just when folks think they are figuring it all out. Sheldrake believes we are at another of those moments in history. I tend to agree. ( )
  stonester1 | Oct 8, 2012 |
A thrilling call to arms, warning his fellow scientists not to become narrow minded in their pursuit of knowledge. ( )
  jason.goodwin | Mar 22, 2012 |
Many aspects of the cosmos are outstanding mysteries. Sheldrake has novel suggestions as to why. This work is most interesting when putting forward these unconventional ideas, but rather shabby when criticizing establishment values. Clearly he is an aggrieved holist, most comfortable with syntheses of ideas, and at times unappreciative of analyses. The book starts by arguing against what Sheldrake understands to be the existing paradigm of science, a machine-like cosmic analogy he calls the dogma of materialism.

He lists ten dominant tenants of this paradigm. As most tenants are conflations of ill-fitting 19th century ideas, he should have found it much easier to demolish his straw-man. Certainly the second half of the book is less awkward and misleading, albeit more speculative. However he presents his comparisons with competing views poorly. Indeed he is often more interesting in suggestive results than the clarity that comes from an analysis of what things mean. His central premise is that there is a Platonic realm of morphic remembrances, alongside the physical world. This realm can and does change the way the cosmos operates. ( )
  Jewsbury | Mar 16, 2012 |
Showing 5 of 5
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Series (with order)
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Awards and honors
For all those who have helped and encouraged me, especially my wife Jill and our sons Merlln and Cosmo.
First words
Many people who have not studied science are baffled by scientists' insistence that animal and plants are machines, and that humans are robots too, controlled by computer-like brains and genetically programmed software.
Last words
(Click to show. Warning: May contain spoilers.)
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Publisher series

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English (1)

Book description
Haiku summary

No descriptions found.

"In Science Set Free, Dr. Rupert Sheldrake, one of the world's most innovative scientists, shows the ways in which science is being constricted by assumptions that have hardened into dogmas that are not only limiting, but also dangerous for the future of humanity" -- Front jacket flap.… (more)

» see all 4 descriptions

Quick Links

Swap Ebooks Audio
9 wanted4 pay

Popular covers


Average: (4.59)
3 1
3.5 1
4 1
5 8

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.


Help/FAQs | About | Privacy/Terms | Blog | Contact | LibraryThing.com | APIs | WikiThing | Common Knowledge | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | 89,455,110 books! | Top bar: Always visible