Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... Peter Pan in scarlet (edition 2008)by Geraldine McCaughrean, J. M. Barrie
Work InformationPeter Pan in Scarlet by Geraldine McCaughrean
Books Read in 2017 (2,079) Loading...
Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. No current Talk conversations about this book. I have zero idea why this book deserves anything less than the full five stars. I love the original and there is obviously respect and research involved in this sequel. Details that tie not only the original Peter Pan story but other bits of J.M. Barrie's creations to this one. Author is wonderful with spinning words together to create surprising, quirky sentences. LOVED IT! As did my 12 and 15 year olds. ( ) Reseña en español: http://boisde-merveilles.blogspot.com/2018/04/peter-pan-de-rojo-escarlata-gerald... Okay, first I must say I haven’t read or watched Peter Pan, I know what it is about, but that’s it. Maybe the reason I didn’t enjoy this at all is because I haven’t read the original, or I don’t know, tons of people who love the original say they disliked this sequel. The book is short and fast paced; the edition I have has small illustrations at the beginning of each chapter and is a red hardcover, so, aesthetically is beautiful. The start of the story was interesting, light hearted and kind of silly or funny, the old lost boys must return to Neverland, and to do so they must be kids so they dress with their children’s clothes. To be honest this seemed kind of silly to me because there is one of them who has no children, so he wouldn’t be able to go but suddenly he becomes a kid by standing near the bed or something like that. And there is another one that is male and has only daughters and by using their clothes he becomes a girl. There is this theme of “clothes make/define the person” along the whole book, starting with what I just said. I couldn’t connect with the characters, they were two dimensional and annoying at times, I just liked Wendy, she was the only one with common sense, sometimes. I totally hated Peter, he was such a despicable character, mean, cruel and a complete jerk. I couldn’t stand him, thou he was partially interesting, but it didn’t compensate he being a jerk. I think that during most the book nothing really happens, they all go on adventures and two new characters join them, Ravello, a circus man, and Firefly, a fairy. The build up to the climax of the book took too long, so much that when the revelation happened it wasn’t that spectacular because it took so long for something interesting to happen. I must admit the revelation was an interesting plot twist, but I think I expected more of it. The end of the book left me with unanswered questions and I felt it was kind of hurried. The writing style is childish; it’s obvious the book is for younger audiences, it’s simple but descriptive enough to let the reader picture the landscapes of Neverland. If you are a fan of Peter Pan, you might want to give this a try, the fact that it wasn’t for me doesn’t mean it’s bad. I would only recommend it to fans of the original book, it was entertaining and an easy and fast read, but if you are not a fan or the target middle grade audience, you might not enjoy the book that much. no reviews | add a review
Is a (non-series) sequel toAwards
In the 1930s, all is not well. Nightmares are leaking out of Neverland. Fearing for Peter Pan's life, Wendy and the Lost Boys go back to Neverland -- with the help of the fairy Fireflyer -- only to discover their worst nightmares coming true! Peter Pan and his friends eventually restore Neverland to rights. No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
Google Books — Loading... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)823.914Literature English & Old English literatures English fiction Modern Period 1901-1999 1945-1999LC ClassificationRatingAverage:
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |