HomeGroupsTalkZeitgeist
Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Behind the Shock Machine: The Untold Story…
Loading...

Behind the Shock Machine: The Untold Story of the Notorious Milgram… (2012)

by Gina Perry

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingConversations
422273,462 (3.5)None

None.

None
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

Showing 2 of 2
I've been interested in the Stanley Milgram experiments for a long time -- the "obedience to authority" ones, more than anything else, though as Gina Perry pointed out, he did other startling and original research. For example, that idea that you're only six degrees of separation from someone else? That was his experiment. The one about good will, testing whether people would post letters just left out, and how many would respond based on the addresses on the envelope? Also Milgram.

Anyway, my interest was piqued again more recently by Dar Williams' song, Buzzer (lyrics), which imagine being a participant in the experiment. It doesn't matter about the details, how closely they fit what really happened. What matters is this line: "I get it now, I'm the face/I'm the cause of war/we don't have to blame white-coated men anymore."

Part of Gina Perry's focus in this book is unpacking how people felt after they were the subject in the experiments. She met some of them for research, listened to the transcripts and the follow-up interviews, spent hours with the material. And some of them really were traumatised by what happened under the experimental conditions: some of them weren't 'dehoaxed' until months after their participation in the study. They didn't know that they hadn't really come anywhere near killing a man. Some of the ethical problems with this study are astounding, and Perry unpacks them nicely.

One of the things I think people find harder with this book is her outlook on Milgram. She started out being an enormous fan of his work: it was only when she dug deeper into it that she began to feel ambivalent, even a little horrified. I wonder if people would feel the same unequivocal admiration for Milgram if they could listen to those transcripts, all of them, and experience the way he went on with the experiments despite the distress of his subjects.

It certainly sounds from this book like Milgram's results were nowhere near as clear-cut as he presented them. For example, everyone knows that the outcome is that "most" people would obey an authority figure to the point of killing someone -- but the fact is that 65% did. That's still the majority, but that includes people who weren't sure if the shocks were real or not as well as people who were sure they were real, and it also includes people who protested all the way. It does show the effect of pressure by an authority figure, but the picture is a little less clear than we tend to think.

And then there's the cherry picking of his results. For example, condition 24 showed only 10% obedience: that was people paired with people they really knew. Authority can't overcome personal relationships. Milgram never published about condition 24. Despite being a fan of his work, Perry didn't know anything about it until she found the records, bundled in with those of condition 23.

Given that, it's astonishing to me that anyone defending Milgram can then claim that Perry is cherry picking her data. At the very least, she provides details of all of the conditions. She ends up with strong personal feelings about the whole situation, but she quotes both from Milgram's private notes and his published work, showing his doubts, showing that he worried about the welfare of the subjects more than comes through in his published work. After reading one of the first major critiques of his work, he drew a little doodle and wrote beside it, "I feel bad."

It's true that Perry has an ideological position on Milgram, but it's fair to say that from her account, that arises from the depth of her research. I don't think anyone going into the impact of the experiments could avoid it; she doesn't claim to be writing a book about the scientific principles, but about the people involved. I think she does a fairly good job of presenting various sides of all of them.

Overall, I found this really fascinating, though I do always keep in mind that non-fiction is no less ideologically charged than any kind of writing. Of course Perry has opinions, and her exploration of these and how they developed during her research are a key part of the book. It's not the last or only word on Milgram. ( )
  shanaqui | Jul 6, 2014 |
This book was very interesting to me, mostly because what I felt is missing in most reviews of the Milgram experiment is the point of view of participants.

Some of the things mentioned in the book were suprising to learn, such as the fact that the participants were not immediately told the truth after the experiment was over.

That being said, the book is not without it's flaws. The author focuses on the ethical and practical concerns about the experiment, and in effect makes it seems as if the results are not applicable to anything in real life at all. Some of the criticisms are extremely naive and, frankly, a bit silly - such as the implication that, because the whole situation and the laboratory was designed in such a way as to make it difficult for participants to disobey, the experiment shows nothing about actual behavior in real life situation. Yes, the laboratory was designed in such a way as to make it difficult to disobey - but so are most real world authority situations. Which is precisely what makes it applicable. A similar criticism about the participants trusting the authority of science, of it all being under control and for a good cause - this sounds highly likely, however, far from discrediting the experiment, it brings it closer to the real world authority situation - don't people, in most cases, assume that the authority is benign and that everything they are doing is for a good cause? ( )
  Beholderess | Dec 22, 2013 |
Showing 2 of 2
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Series (with order)
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Awards and honors
Epigraph
Dedication
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Publisher series
Original language

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English

None

Book description
Haiku summary

No descriptions found.

In Behind the Shock Machine, psychologist and author Gina Perry unearths for the first time the full story of this controversial experiment and its startling repercussions.

» see all 2 descriptions

Quick Links

Swap Ebooks Audio
6 wanted

Popular covers

Rating

Average: (3.5)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3 3
3.5
4
4.5
5 1

Penguin Australia

An edition of this book was published by Penguin Australia.

» Publisher information page

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

You are using the new servers! | About | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 117,013,280 books! | Top bar: Always visible