|
Loading... The New Biographical Dictionary of Filmby David Thomson
LibraryThing recommendationsMember recommendationsLoading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. A major work of literate, insightful, readable film criticism in the guise of a biographical dictionary. Thomson's book ignores the (relatively recent) convention of the impersonal, objective, unbiased reference work, using the format to give us as much critical opinion as biographical fact. The best entries are defnitive or near-definitive essays on film figures, mostly actors and directors with some major writers, technicians, and moguls included. Hawks (as the cover might suggest) and Grant are placed near the summit; Chaplin is taken down. Thomson's judgments can be severe. As the focus is on the lives and careers of film people, individual films are often praised or dismissed in less than a line - these sub-capsule reviews should have fans of the Dictionary eagerly anticipating Thomson's new "Personal Introduction to 1000 Films". FYI - Thomson has been adding and updating biographical entries on guardian.co.uk. A good reference for movies pre-2000, but the reviews are often oblique, and the author has strange opinions that are not well defended. David Thomson knows his stuff and his writing is wry, smart and very, very funny. This book is a delight for any film fan -- flip open to any page and enjoy. --Michael Curious, maddening, edifying, occasionally completely wrong. When you get to the point where Thomson includes both his dead best friend and his son ("when will he make his first film?" he muses), you realise that this is a dictionary of [i]Thomson's[/i] biography, refracted through film. The diverse editions (five, at this writing) bear this out: the earlier entries from past editions (on, say, Hitchcock) show a more academic, theory-oriented stamp, whereas progressive entries (say, on Nicole Kidman) evince his decades-long evolution into a gossipy queen. (The infamous entry on Wes Andersen alone, plus some other comments in other entries stating "look at the damn IMdB if you want facts," more or less, speak to a kind of glibness that infects his later work.) Thomsen is an important, lucid critic when he chooses to be (his writing on Welles and Selznick is superb), but he tends to the self-important and grandiose (a tendency which makes his recent long-form "The Whole Equation" virtually unreadable), so it's best to read him in discrete chunks. The dictionary form is ideal. no reviews | add a review
References to this work on external resources.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book description |
|
(retrieved from Amazon Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:58:17 -0400)
The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details.
Quick Links |
And why is there an entry for Willis O'Brien but nothing for the GREAT Ray Harryhausen? And why no mench of one of my favorite character actors and tough guys, Brian Dennehy? I thought of other omissions but forgot to write them down.
Invaluable, yes, absolutely. A definitive compendium of film, an exhaustive "Who's Who" of 100+ years of cinema? Absolutely NOT. (