HomeGroupsTalkZeitgeist
Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Murder In Retrospect by Agatha Christie
Loading...

Murder In Retrospect (original 1942; edition 1942)

by Agatha Christie

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
2,180372,981 (3.73)76
Member:RedQueen
Title:Murder In Retrospect
Authors:Agatha Christie (Author)
Info:Bantam Books (1985), Hardcover
Collections:Your library, Mystery, Favorites
Rating:****
Tags:classic British, detective, England, Hercule Poirot, mystery, 12

Work details

Five Little Pigs by Agatha Christie (1942)

Recently added byliefcharles, elkiedee, sarahbradshaw, Sharunya, private library, QueenOfCrime, Inguling
Legacy LibrariesArthur Ransome, Carl Sandburg
  1. 10
    Death of a Ghost by Margery Allingham (cmbohn)
  2. 00
    Hickory Dickory Dock by Agatha Christie (Anonymous user)
    Anonymous user: Both books are similar with their references to nursery rhymes. Though the books are different in its scenarios.
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

» See also 76 mentions

English (32)  French (2)  Danish (1)  Swedish (1)  Spanish (1)  All languages (37)
Showing 1-5 of 32 (next | show all)
The daughter of a woman convicted 16 years before of murdering her husband is convinced her mother is innocent and asks Poirot to reopen the case. Poirot does take it , questioning those who were present at the time. I read it so long ago that all I recall is that he does, of course, find that someone else did the murder. Cleverly told with an almost Rashomon-like effect of retelling the story from the viewpoints of the different witnesses, who have very different attitudes towards the victim, the alleged murderess, and the other suspects. Poirot just goes around and listens to their contrasting stories. ( )
  antiquary | Nov 14, 2014 |
The puzzle and solution are clever, but I didn't warm to any of the characters, and the story is told in a way that makes the process of detection pretty opaque. I prefer ones where you get to hear the detective's hypotheses and plans as you go. ( )
  AmphipodGirl | Oct 14, 2014 |
I like the ending but the second third of the story is a waste of time. The crime took place sixteen years before the time of the story and Poirot spends his time interviewing the little pigs to get their version of what had happened. The book could then easily go right to the reconstruction (third part of the book) chapters but instead it choses to languish for another hundred pages on written accounts of the interviews we've just read! ARGH!!!! Do yourself a favor and skip the second act for the third. ( )
  pussreboots | Sep 22, 2014 |
Hercule Poirot faces perhaps his biggest challenge yet – a 16-year-old cold case. Caroline Crale was convicted of murdering her artist husband, Amyas Crale, over his affair with a much younger woman. Caroline Crale died a year later, leaving a letter to be given to their young daughter when she came of age. The daughter, Carla, has just received the letter in which her mother assures her of her innocence. Carla believes her mother's statement, but she thinks her fiance has doubts. Hercule Poirot may be the only person who could get to the truth of what happened all those years ago. There are five other suspects, and all are still living: brothers Phillip and Meredith Blake, the Crale's nearest neighbors; Elsa Greer, Amyas Crale's model and the “other woman”; Angela Warren, Caroline Crale's younger half sister; and Cecilia Williams, Angela's governess. Poirot asks each of the five for their account of the events leading to Amyas Crale's death and he reaches a surprising conclusion.

In many ways this is a typical country house mystery. There is no doubt that Amyas Crale was poisoned. Other than Amyas and Caroline Crale, only the five living witnesses had access to the poison. If Caroline Crale didn't murder her husband, one of them must have done it. I thought I had the murder all figured out, only to discover that I had fallen for one of the red herrings that Christie so skillfully creates. Christie worked in a pharmacy during World War I, and she is at her best when she writes about poisons. Although this isn't as well known as several of Poirot's other cases, it's still a solid mystery and is characteristic of Christie's work. ( )
  cbl_tn | May 14, 2014 |
This is not my favourite Christie, it's not even my favourite Poirot, but it's definitely a masterwork. This is where Poirot gets to show he doesn't need the cigarette ash and bits of cloth to solve a mystery as he re-investigates a murder that occured 16 years before. It's also a nice antidote to those mysteries where the detective is given more information than the reader. Here we are given exactly the same information as Poirot and allowed to try to figure out whodunit along with him.

It's not perfect, I found the characterisation of Philip Blake a bit flat, but I love all the little character details for Poirot, like when he tells himself off for thinking in nursery rhymes (again) and how he chooses to present himself to the five people present on the day of the murder.

Definitely worth a read. ( )
1 vote redfiona | May 11, 2014 |
Showing 1-5 of 32 (next | show all)
no reviews | add a review

» Add other authors (21 possible)

Author nameRoleType of authorWork?Status
Christie, Agathaprimary authorall editionsconfirmed
Fraser, HughNarratorsecondary authorsome editionsconfirmed
Laine, Anna-LiisaTranslatorsecondary authorsome editionsconfirmed
López Hipkiss, GuillermoTranslatorsecondary authorsome editionsconfirmed
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Series (with order)
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Awards and honors
Epigraph
Dedication
First words
Hercule Poirot looked with interest and appreciation at the young woman who was being ushered into the room.
Quotations
Last words
(Click to show. Warning: May contain spoilers.)
Disambiguation notice
"Five little Pigs" and "Murder in Retrospect" are the same work
This should be linked with the other records for Five Little Pigs in the Hercule Poirot Mysteries, but trying to do a link on an Agatha Christie is very difficult due to the numbers of books.
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Publisher series
Original language

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English (1)

Book description
Amyas Crale had een famous as a painter ... and infamous as a lover. his fiery wife, Caroline, had been as jealous as she was devoted. So naturally it was she who was tried and convicted for his murder.
Now their daughter, Carla, presents the brilliant Hercule Poirot with the greatest challenge of his career - to clear her mother's name by finding the fatal flaw in what, after sixteen years, appears to be the perfect crime!
    ------------------------------

Meredith Blake stared at Poirot. "My dear man, if she didn't - "
"Well, if she didn't?"
"I can't imagine any alternative solution. Accident? Surely impossible."
"Quite impossible."
"And I can't believe in the suicide theory. It had to be brought forward, but it was quite unconvincing to anyone who knew Crale."
"Quite."
"So what remains?" asked Meredtih Blake.
Poirot said coolly, "There remains hte possibilty of his having been killed by somebody else.."
Beautiful Caroline Crale was convicted of poisoning her husband, yet there were five other suspects: Philip Blake (the stockbroker) who went to market; Meredith Blake (the amateur herbalist) who stayed at home; Elsa Greer (the three-time divorcee) who had roast beef; Cecilia Williams (the devoted governess) who had none; and Angela Warren (the disfigured sister) who cried 'wee wee wee' all the way home.

It is sixteen years later, but Hercule Poirot just can't get that nursery rhyme out of his mind…

[retrieved 5/25/13 from Amazon.com]
Haiku summary

Amazon.com Product Description (ISBN 0425093255, Mass Market Paperback)

Take one dead lothario; add his jealous wife accused of his murder; toss in a devoted daughter who wants to clear her mother's name, and you get one of the greatest challenges of Hercule Poirot's career.

(retrieved from Amazon Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:42:57 -0400)

(see all 7 descriptions)

Fourteen years after the wife of the renowned painter Amyas Crale was sent to the gallows for poisoning her husband, their daughter Lucy returns from Canada. Lucy carries with her a letter that suggests that her mother might have been innocent. Poirot agrees to dig up the past, but he warns Lucy that she may not like what he finds.… (more)

(summary from another edition)

» see all 9 descriptions

Quick Links

Swap Ebooks Audio
59 avail.
46 wanted
4 pay5 pay

Popular covers

Rating

Average: (3.73)
0.5
1 4
1.5 2
2 14
2.5 7
3 120
3.5 29
4 144
4.5 18
5 72

Audible.com

2 editions of this book were published by Audible.com.

See editions

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

Help/FAQs | About | Privacy/Terms | Blog | Contact | LibraryThing.com | APIs | WikiThing | Common Knowledge | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | 94,328,000 books! | Top bar: Always visible