|
Loading... Londonby Edward Rutherford (otherwise under Edward Rutherfurd)
LibraryThing recommendationsMember recommendations
Loading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. I read it. It's very informative. Whoopie. ( )I read this before going to London and have also recommended it to many people. I love Rutherfurd, he's great. He does use the word "estuary" kind of a lot! I’ve been a fan of Rutherfurd’s since reading his debut novel, “Sarum”. “London” remains my favorite, possibly because of my great fondness for that city but also because of the bang-up job Rutherfurd does bringing it to life. He starts at the beginning—the end of the last Ice Age—and goes full-tilt from there on. Following the fortunes of six families, the story winds through the Roman occupation to the days of Chaucer, the Globe Theatre, Dickens, and beyond. The pace is fast, characters come and go a little quickly, but overall this is a satisfying read that will sweep you away into the heart and soul of a fascinating city. Typical Rutherfurd historical fiction, with London as the subject. Very similar in style to much of Michener's work. I had started this book several years ago, got halfway through and then put it down. I picked it up again for the flight back to Australia, thinking that 1300 pages would probably keep me going and I am pleased to say it did. It is perfect airline reading - not too challenging, but still compelling so you want to keep going. The difficulty with this type of book (which, I believe Edward Rutherford excels at) is that no story or character is ever really examined in depth - except one. London. London is the true hero of this book and all of the other people, personalities and families are merely bystanders. They provide colour and interest, enhancing the history and development of the city over the ages. Rutherford never lets a story stop abruptly - there is always some kind of closure for characters, even if the next section is set 200 years after, but you learn very quickly to let go of characters so you can move on. Probably the biggest lessons I learnt from this book - which were things I already knew? How divisive and destructive religion has been over the years, how fortunes rise and fall, how short life is, and how minute that life is in the context of surrounding history. It was a fascinating read. no reviews | add a review
Amazon.com (ISBN 0449002632, Mass Market Paperback)Edward Rutherfurd belongs to the James Michener school: he writes big, sprawling history-by- the-pound. His novel, London, stretches two millennia all the way from Roman times to the present. The author places his vignettes at the most dramatic moments of that city's history, leaping from Caesar's invasion to the Norman Conquest to the Great Fire to (of course) the Blitz, with many stops in between. London is ambitious, and students of English history will eat it up. The author doesn't skimp on historical detail, and that's a signal pleasure of the book. Ultimately, though, the structure of the novel determines the lion's share of its success. Rutherfurd is a good storyteller and each vignette makes for a good story; however, he has given himself the inevitable task of beginning what amounts to a new book every 40 pages or so. Just as one begins to warm to the characters, they are hurried off the stage. You can't read London without a scorecard—but that's part of the fun.(retrieved from Amazon Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:57:53 -0400) The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||