I loved this book. I had understood it was a telling of 'Pride and Prejudice' from the servants' point of view, and thought this sounded underwhelming. But no. It's a completely different story, mainly told from the point of view of Sarah, taken in as a young foundling to complement the small serving team of Mr and Mrs. Hill at Longbourn, the house and home we know so well from Jane Austen's book. The Bennets are only the bit parts in this story, their narrative only important when it affects the servants'own lives. Baker vividly brings to live the harsh toil of the servants, their close dependency on one another, and on the Bennets themselves. The tale she weaves round Sarah and the new footman, James, is believable and eventually gripping. The 'back story', which eventually comes to light towards the end of the book adds yet another dimension. I'll return to Pride and Prejudice with new eyes, and expect to enjoy it even more. ( )

I am passionate about Austen, so I find it difficult to judge this book. Characterization and plot were okay, seemed a bit obsessed with what, to modern readers, would be the ick factor of the age, but it seems unlikely the people of the time would have focused on it so much.

what makes me angry, and do not read further if you've not read the book, is here utter indictemnetof Mr. Bennett's character. A flwed man he was, a man who impregnates a young girl, keeps her as his servant the rest of her life while barely giving enough to his bastard to keep him from utter poverty and degradation, this man would not have raised a Jane or an Elizabeth. Then we are to admire the footman because , having overlooked the pedophilia, he is finally moved to murder due to a common if utterly barbaric act of military procedure- I'm not saying I wouldn't have wanted to kill as well, but...

Anyway, I think she does a dis-service to the original, which may not have bothered me as much had she not claimed, in her afterword, not to have "interfered" with it ( )

This book is told from the point of view of the servants of the Bennett family from Pride and Prejudice. It is ostensibly a retelling of Pride and Prejudice, but the events of that story only barely touch the events of this novel. If you didn't know anything about Pride and Prejudice, you probably wouldn't realize you were missing anything here. If you are a P&P purist, you probably want to avoid this book, because it paints a very different picture of Mr. Bennett. Longbourn focuses primarily on Sarah, a young servant of the household, and her potential romantic entanglements with one of Mr. Bingley's servants and with James, a footman who has recently started working in the Bennett household.

I found this to be a bit slow to get going, but the writing nicely evokes Austen-era prose without feeling stilted. It feels very authentic and well-researched. The characters are generally well-written, although I didn't find Sarah to be particularly compelling. ( )

I've read several Pride and Prejudice retellings, both modern and POV retellings, and I found this one to be my favorite so far.
Not only does it let the story unfold from the servants point of view, with the Bennett family being just the background, it also sets the story with a more world-view of events of the time period, from slavery to the Napoleonic Wars.

I really liked how the life stories of several of the servants over generations coalesce into the main story. ( )

While Austen adaptations, especially Pride and Prejudice reworks, are cliche at this point, Jo Baker's class dexterity and imaginative sympathy make this book more than worth reading. Taking the power of perspective out from Elizabeth’s hands allows the story to put the Bennets’ supposed descent into poverty into perspective, expanding to account for a further stratified class system that's barely acknowledged within the original text. By taking Pride and Prejudice belowstairs, Jo Baker gives the story a commentative edge that keeps it, if not socially transgressive in the modern day, then at the very least challenging to the genre. ( )