|
Loading... House of Leavesby Mark Z. Danielewski
LibraryThing recommendationsMember recommendations
Loading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. I admit it: I was incredibly intimidated by the thought of reading this book, and it took me more than two years to get around to it. Once I did, though, I discovered it to be a disarmingly beautiful and readable book that teaches you how to move through it. You can focus as you wish where you wish, move through it as quickly or slowly as you like, and you'll be engaged and fascinated, as well as frustrated at various points, regardless. The book is undeniably postmodern, creepy, genius, and artfully written, and it's a work to allow yourself to sink into instead of getting bogged down in. It's both entertaining and hilarious, and I can't recommend it highly enough to readers who are up for an experience and a challenge. It's not easy, especially not in the beginning or central middle, but it's not a book to give up on, since it only gets better. Scary, willful, and highly recommended. ( )This book is an amazingly put together mind-trip. A short way into the book you will be wondering if those stairs have really always been there. This book is an amazingly put together mind-trip. A short way into the book you will be wondering if those stairs have really always been there. Spelunking an ancient tesseract-house of unguessable origin and infinite darkness = Awesome. The fetishistic and at times painfully self-aware study of textual mediation, not so much. The first thing that you must do before reading this book is flip though the pages and realize that this is not just a book, it is a physical piece of art. There are pages with so many words you don't want to read them all, and some with so few words that you stop and stare and a blank page, imagining the words that it is supposed to represent. The book covers the story of Navidson, a famous photographer, and his family as they move into a new house. Fortunately or unfortunately, the house is not what it appears to be. Though it is an eerie tale of some kind of supernatural, there are other themes of family, love, and overcoming yourself that shine through. As Navidson and the family deal with the house and it's continuing surprises, they discover things about themselves that had been lost in the shuffle of their lives. All of this is told by Johnny Traunt, via footnotes. He find the story written on scraps of paper and napkin in an old mans apartment, and decides to finish the work the old man started before he mysteriously died. But this work has a horrible effect on him. He becomes paranoid and secluded. The reader follows him through his journey as well as the Navidson's, but You must decide what, in the end, this tale of the strange is all about.
House of leaves by Mark Z. Danielewski runs to 710 pages: 13 pages of introduction, 535 of text, followed by three appendices and a 42-page, triple-column index. ... let me say right off that his book is funny, moving, sexy, beautifully told, an elaborate engagement with the shape and meaning of narrative. For all its modernist maneuvers, postmodernist airs and post-postmodernist critical parodies, ''House of Leaves'' is, when you get down to it, an adventure story: a man starts traveling inside a house that keeps getting larger from within, even as its outside dimensions remain the same. He is entering deep space through the closet door.
Amazon.com (ISBN 0375703764, Paperback)Had The Blair Witch Project been a book instead of a film, and had it been written by, say, Nabokov at his most playful, revised by Stephen King at his most cerebral, and typeset by the futurist editors of Blast at their most avant-garde, the result might have been something like House of Leaves. Mark Z. Danielewski's first novel has a lot going on: notably the discovery of a pseudoacademic monograph called The Navidson Record, written by a blind man named Zampanò, about a nonexistent documentary film--which itself is about a photojournalist who finds a house that has supernatural, surreal qualities. (The inner dimensions, for example, are measurably larger than the outer ones.) In addition to this Russian-doll layering of narrators, Danielewski packs in poems, scientific lists, collages, Polaroids, appendices of fake correspondence and "various quotes," single lines of prose placed any which way on the page, crossed-out passages, and so on.Now that we've reached the post-postmodern era, presumably there's nobody left who needs liberating from the strictures of conventional fiction. So apart from its narrative high jinks, what does House of Leaves have to offer? According to Johnny Truant, the tattoo-shop apprentice who discovers Zampanò's work, once you read The Navidson Record, For some reason, you will no longer be the person you believed you once were. You'll detect slow and subtle shifts going on all around you, more importantly shifts in you. Worse, you'll realize it's always been shifting, like a shimmer of sorts, a vast shimmer, only dark like a room. But you won't understand why or how.We'll have to take his word for it, however. As it's presented here, the description of the spooky film isn't continuous enough to have much scare power. Instead, we're pulled back into Johnny Truant's world through his footnotes, which he uses to discharge everything in his head, including the discovery of the manuscript, his encounters with people who knew Zampanò, and his own battles with drugs, sex, ennui, and a vague evil force. If The Navidson Record is a mad professor lecturing on the supernatural with rational-seeming conviction, Truant's footnotes are the manic student in the back of the auditorium, wigged out and furiously scribbling whoa-dude notes about life. Despite his flaws, Truant is an appealingly earnest amateur editor--finding translators, tracking down sources, pointing out incongruities. Danielewski takes an academic's--or ex-academic's--glee in footnotes (the similarity to David Foster Wallace is almost too obvious to mention), as well as other bogus ivory-tower trappings such as interviews with celebrity scholars like Camille Paglia and Harold Bloom. And he stuffs highbrow and pop-culture references (and parodies) into the novel with the enthusiasm of an anarchist filling a pipe bomb with bits of junk metal. House of Leaves may not be the prettiest or most coherent collection, but if you're trying to blow stuff up, who cares? --John Ponyicsanyi (retrieved from Amazon Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:58:17 -0400) The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||