

Loading... Four Plays: The Bald Soprano; The Lesson; Jack, or the Submission; The…by Eugène Ionesco
![]() Modernism (130) No current Talk conversations about this book. "The Bald Soprano" is pretty wonderful, but I truly hated "The Lesson." ( ![]() The title play is the best (and funniest) in this collection, which is remarkable since it was Ionesco's first. Theater of the Absurd is best in small doses, were it not for the length and scope, "The Chairs" would have been better. Absurdist theatre from one of the greatest masters. Ionesco treats us to the absurdity of human life with four plays that make almost no sense at all, and yet, at the same time, they do make sort of an absurd sense. The nonsensical use of words is reminiscent of Gertrude Stein; the use of strange characters in stranger situations of Samuel Beckett; the use of stark sets is worthy of the staunchest post-modernist, but the works are pure Ionesco, twisting as much absurdity as humanly possible into these four short plays. And in some cases, such as The Lesson, it is easy to believe he had a crystal ball, as some of the conversations were so eerily prescient; the attitude of the student toward mathematics and toward education in general is a picture-perfect portrayal of the millenial student. And I will read a long time before I find a line as sublime as "Philology leads to calamity". Absurd is not my style. I found this frustrating and irritating to read. If it wasn't an assignment, I wouldn't have gotten through ti. These four plays of Ionesco, among the very first that he wrote, already show him preoccupied with themes that will concern him for the rest of his career in theatre: the futility of language, the terror of ideological conformity, and theorizing about the play within the framework of the play itself. This volume includes "The Bald Soprano," "The Lesson," "Jack; Or, The Submission," and "The Chairs." Needless to say, giving a summary, insofar as one could eve be adduced, would go against the spirit of absurdism generally speaking. After all, the plots are not the most interesting things in the plays. Ionesco got the idea for "The Bald Soprano" while trying to learn Assimil method. His textbook had two characters, Mr. and Mrs. Smith (who also appear in his play), and who, despite being married to one another, feel compelled to describe one another's physical appearance, tell one another that they are both English as if all of this was genuinely new information. Mr. and Mrs. are the epitome of the English bourgeois, speaking in stock phrases and clichés (How curious it is, how curious it is, how bizarre, and what a coincidence!") so worn with use as to be devoid of any meaning. The dialogue between the characters provides a discursiveness with which he points to the emptiness and futility of language, the hopelessness of communication. Ionesco describes "The Lesson" as a "comic drama," though I found difficulty founding anything comic in it. In this play, he takes on the subject of authoritarianism as a professor of philology (which "always turns into calamity," according to his maid) relentlessly and unmercifully lectures a female student. When she proves unable to understand much of the material, he grows increasingly violent, with the student ending up dead. At the very end of the play, we learn that she is the professor's fortieth victim. And another one is walking in the door. So much for the victory of Reason. Unlike the work of other absurdists, Beckett for example, Ionesco's plays are ostentatious, full of lively dialogue, and never inward-looking or contemplative, although many of Ionesco's themes are also Beckett's. The narrativity of drama, or the lack thereof, or even the possibility thereof, is a subject of both of their work. At least for me, these plays are fun, but only in small doses. The constant litany of illogical non sequiturs and trying to keep track of all the characters that have similar names can become a little taxing and grating if the exposure goes on for too long. Nevertheless, these plays have aged remarkably well, and they remain one of the best introductions to the Theatre of the Absurd for the uninitiated. no reviews | add a review
References to this work on external resources.
|
![]() Popular coversRatingAverage:![]()
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |