Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... Soviet Secret Projects: Fighters Since 1945by Tony Buttler, Yefim Gordon
None Loading...
Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. No current Talk conversations about this book. no reviews | add a review
Belongs to SeriesSecrete Projects (Soviet 1)
This title is devoted to post World War 2 fighters and includes designs from bureaux such as Lavochkin, Mikoyan, Sukhoi, Yakovlev, Myasishchev and Tupolev. No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsNone
Google Books — Loading... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)355Social sciences Public Administration, Military Science Military ScienceLC ClassificationRatingAverage:
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
By and large “the authorities” seemed to react to Western aircraft designs and insist that the Soviets produce something better – even if the Western design was a dead end. For example, in the early 1950s the US briefly flirted with a VTOL aircraft, the Convair XFV and the Lockheed XFY. The intent was to have a “convoy escort” aircraft that could take off and land from a small space on a merchant vessel or escort ship – something similar to the catapulted Hurricanes that combated the “Condor menace” during WWII. Neither project was terribly successful; landing backwards was interesting for the pilot, a turboprop aircraft couldn’t match the performance of contemporary jets, and the West ended up with sufficient aircraft carrier, air defense missile, and long-range aircraft resources to counter any potential Soviet air attacks on convoys between the US and the UK. The Soviets, however, took the idea and ran with it, ending up with the Sukhoi Shkval, which had twin jets instead of a turboprop and got around the rearward vision problem by having the pilot’s seat swivel 180°. Except, of course, the Soviets wouldn’t have had any convoys to escort.
OTOH, the Soviets put a lot of effort into more conventional STOL aircraft, with dozens of designs (there was even a STOL version of the MiG-25 – the drawback being that by the time all the additional ducts, intakes and nozzles were inserted the aircraft couldn’t carry enough fuel to actually go anywhere). The STOL design the Soviets finally settled on was the Yak-38 – which, again apparently due to the conservatism of “the authorities”, looks remarkably like a Harrier.
The MiG-25, of course, created its own legend in the West; when I was growing up the conventional wisdom was that the aircraft was intended to counter the B-70 and that the US had “tricked” the XSSR into building a useless aircraft by abandoning the supersonic bomber. As it happens, the MiG-25 was far from useless, although it may not have been capable of intercepting a B-70. Although the engines were capable of propelling MiG-25 to Mach 3, at speeds above Mach 2.83 the aircraft became uncontrollable due to aileron inversion. The XB-70 exceeded Mach 3 in test flights. I note that the Wikipedia article on the MiG-25 claims that the top speed is limited by engine damage, not by aileron inversion as claimed by Butler and Gordon. The original intent of the MiG-25 program included both interceptor and reconnaissance versions; the recon version turned up fairly often in the various Arab-Israeli wars; if you can scrape up $20800 there’s a Russian tourist company who will give you a ride in one.
Interesting enough for this sort of work. What’s missing is any sort of air combat evaluation of any of the aircraft; many of these have appeared in Iraq, Iran, Egypt and Syrian against F-4s, F-14s, F-15s, F16s, and miscellaneous other Western aircraft. ( )