|
Loading...
LibraryThing recommendationsMember recommendationsLoading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. Absolutely loved this book! Imagine if Anne Boleyn kept a diary that was secretly handed down to her daughter, Elizabeth Tudor, who was raised beleiving her mother to be an adulteress and a traitor. I thought the book really made these historical figures come alive, and it was so fascinating I hesitated to put it down at all! Of course, we all know what happened to Anne, but reading her "diary," gaining insight into how she might have felt and what she thought, I still hoped for a happy ending for her. I look forward to reading more from this author. ( )One of the better Anne Boleyn novels. This book offers a nice juxtaposition between Anne's life and that of her daughter Elizabeth. Recommended for all lovers of Tudor historicals. I had my doubts about this book because Anne Boleyn (based on the impression I've got from history and fiction) doesn't strike me as diarist, therefore falling into the category of fictional characters (or characters based on historical people) that I just can't seen as first-person narrators. But I was curious enough to suspend my disbelief and read the book, and once I'd started I just ploughed through. The depiction of Elizabeth didn't particularly appeal to me either. Overall I enjoyed this book, although I was not as fond of Elizabeth’s storyline, perhaps because she simply did not have as much of one as did her mother. This was a very sympathetic portrayal of Anne. The reader could see her harden and turn into the woman oft vilified, could also see how this was almost forced upon her as she tried to keep her head above water in this dangerous age. There were a couple of things that sort of shook me out of the story, however. At one point there was a sentence about Henry that said something to the effect of “…his father dying and his brother dying thereafter.” The way it was written was a bit more ambiguous than that, but it certainly seemed (to me anyway) to be saying that Henry VII died before his son Arthur, which would have made Arthur king between Henry VII and Henry VIII. Since Arthur predeceased Henry VII by about 7 years and was never king, that really brought me out of the story. More minor was a reference by Anne to Judas denying Jesus three times. Peter was the apostle who denied Jesus, Judas the apostle who betrayed him for silver. Although, since the Bible was not widely available in English at the time, it is possible that Anne would have made such a mistake. no reviews | add a review
References to this work on external resources.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book description |
|
When the young Queen Elizabeth I is entrusted with Anne Boleyn's secret diary, she discovers a great deal about the much-maligned mother she never knew. And on learning the truth about her lascivious and despotic father, Henry VIII, she vows never to relinquish control to any man. But this avowal doesn't prevent Elizabeth from pursuing a torrid love affair with her horsemaster, Robin Dudley -- described with near-shocking candor -- as too are Anne's graphic trysts with a very persistent and lustful Henry. Blending a historian's attention to accuracy with a novelist's artful rendering, Maxwell weaves compelling descriptions of court life and devastating portraits of actual people into her naughty, page-turning tale. The result is a masterpiece of historical fiction -- so prophetic of our time that one would think it were ripped from today's headlines.
(retrieved from Amazon Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:57:55 -0400)
The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details.
Quick Links |