

|
Loading... Ivanhoe (1819)by Walter Scott
I read Sir Walter Scott's Ivanhoe when I was very young, so reading it again now for a class was quite interesting. It was odd how much I remembered once I actually got started -- and strange the things that I didn't remember, like the fact that Robin Hood is in it! Reading it now, halfway through the course, it staggered me how very typical it is of a Robin Hood text, and how much it reminded me of Chaucer, too. It's like some bizarre cross between an Arthurian text (with all the jousting and the knights) and a Robin Hood text. This is the first one I've read for this course which makes it a Saxon vs. Norman issue, which is interesting. It was so strange reading this and, for the first time, feeling like I couldn't turn off the critical English Literature student part of me. I keep wanting to ramble on about the king and subject aspects, or the criticism of the clergy, or... I actually really enjoyed it. It's one of the first books I read completely on my ereader, so I suppose the aspect of playing with a new gadget helped, but I found it really easy to read and be absorbed in, even if it is -- by modern standards -- quite wordy. The people who think it's Old English baffle me.* I don't think I had to look up any of the vocabulary in Ivanhoe. In terms of the action and characters, Ivanhoe himself isn't terribly interesting. Oh, sure, he's virtuous and a good knight and the title would make you think he's the main character, but he isn't. The most interesting characters were probably King Richard, Rebecca and Cedric. Rebecca got a little irritating after a while, with it always talking about how utterly perfect she was, but at least she was more interesting than Ivanhoe. The tension between her and Ivanhoe was also interesting -- more so than the love story between Rowena and Ivanhoe. Interested to see what my lecturer has to say about it; I'll probably write my essay on Ivanhoe. *This is Old English (Anglo-Saxon): In ðeosse abbudissan mynstre wæs sum broðor syndriglice mid godcundre gife gemæred ond geweorðad, forþon he gewunade gerisenlice leoð wyrcan, þa ðe to æfestnisse ond to arfæstnisse belumpon, swa ðætte swa hwæt swa he of godcundum stafum þurh boceras geleornode, þæt he æfter medmiclum fæce in scopgereorde mid þa mæstan swetnisse ond inbryrdnisse geglængde ond in Engliscgereorde wel geworht forþ brohte. For example. Engrossing historical drama with disturbing prejudices shown by the characters. Long before I read this book (in 9th-grade English, if I recall correctly), I was familiar with bits of the story from the TV series -- who of my generation can forget "Ivanhoe-oe, Ivanhoe!" As someone with an almost lifelong interest in Scotland, I wonder why the only book of Scott's I've read is this one, which has an English setting? It's a ripping yarn with some depth to it, especially as it treats of the different cultures coexisting in medieval England -- Normans, Saxons, Jews. I really wanted to like this book, because I enjoy a good adventure, swashbuckling story. Unfortunately, I found the prose slow-going -- although once I became immersed in the plot, it was easier to read. no reviews | add a review Is contained inIVANHOE , THE TALISMAN and CASTLE DANGEROUS - Waverly Novel by Walter Scott Adventure Classics Ivanhoe, Gullivers Travels, Treasure Island, the Call of the Wild, the Count of Monte Crist (boxed se by Walter Scott ContainsIs retold inHas the (non-series) sequelHas the adaptationIs parodied inInspired
References to this work on external resources.
|
Google Books — Loading...
Popular coversRatingAverage: (3.78)
![]() Audible.comThirteen editions of this book were published by Audible.com.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The story is set in the twelfth century, during the period when King Richard I was on crusade and prince John was in charge. It covers the friction between Saxons and Normans, antisemitism, the knights templar, and with Robin Hood and his men thrown in for good measure.
The writing gets a bit ponderous at times, but the story is good enough to keep you reading despite this.
I found the blatant antisemitism difficult, especially as it's difficult to know whether this was Walter Scott's view, or whether he was just trying to show what things were like in the twelfth century.
Some of the suspense is a little overdone: for example, everyone has worked out who the black knight is long before his identity is revealed. Likewise Locksley and the clerk of Copmanhurst.
But that said, it's still a good story. And it's not surprising that there have been many film and TV adaptations. (