|
Loading... Imperial Reckoningby Caroline Elkins
LibraryThing recommendationsMember recommendationsLoading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. Until fairly recently this story of the brutality exacted on the Kenyan population, in particular the Kikuyus, by the colonial Kenyan government with the knowledge and approval of the British Foreign Office was not common knowledge. Caroline Elkins' book corrects this historical ommission and puts the resistance of the Kenyan people in in its proper context. I studied history up to degree level at Oxford University, and yet reading books like this makes me realise how one-sided my education was. The statistics here are stunning - 1.5 million Kenyans imprisoned, perhaps hundreds of thousands killed. But it is the individual stories which are truly shocking: women raped with bottles, men dragged behind trucks until their limbs came off, mass killings, summary execution, castration and a hundred other torture techniques I could never even have imagined. And all this was being perpetrated by British soldiers and colonial administrators in the 1950s, a time when my mother was sitting in a schoolroom in north London being taught to be proud that one-third of the globe was coloured pink. It's a truly heartbreaking story, meticulously researched by a Harvard faculty member, with a wealth of accounts from both sides as well as fascinating quotes from British government archives (those that weren't mysteriously destroyed just before independence). I defy even the most hardened patriot to read this book and still maintain that Britan was a "civilising influence" in Africa. Review by Richard Dowden in the Guardian here: http://books.guardian.co.uk/review/st... Review by Max Hastings for the Telegraph here: http://www.arts.telegraph.co.uk/core/... Review by Daphne Eviatar for the Nation here: http://www.thenation.com/doc/20050221... Review by R W Johnson for the Times here: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/... Review in the Economist here: http://www.economist.com/books/displa... Review by Peter Preston in the Observer here: http://observer.guardian.co.uk/review... Review by Ken Olende in Socialist Review here: http://www.socialistreview.org.uk/art... no reviews | add a review
References to this work on external resources.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book description |
|
She concludes that the war, one of the bloodiest and most protracted decolonization struggles of the past century, was anything but the "civilizing mission" portrayed by British propagandists and settlers. Instead, Britain engaged in an amazingly brutal campaign of ethnic cleansing that seemed to border on outright genocide. While only 32 white settlers were killed by Mau Mau insurgents, Elkins reports that tens of thousands of Kenyans were slaughtered, perhaps up to 300,000. The British also interned the entire 1.5 million population of Kikuyu, the colony's largest ethnic group, in barbed-wire villages, forced-labour reserves where famine and disease ran rampant, and prison camps that Elkins describes as the Kenyan "Gulag." The Kikuyu were subjected to unimaginable torture, or "screening," as British officials called it, which included being whipped, beaten, sodomized, castrated, burned, and forced to eat feces and drink urine. British officials later destroyed almost all official records of the campaign. Elkins infuses her account with the riveting stories of individual Kikuyu detainees, settlers, British officials, and soldiers. This is a stunning narrative that finally sheds light on a misunderstood war for which no one has yet been held officially accountable. --Alex Roslin
(retrieved from Amazon Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:58:09 -0400)
The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details.
Quick Links |
| Ebooks | Audio | Swap |
| — | — | 0/30 |
The British have up until recently been very proud of their imperial achievements. The only problem was that empire-building involved a certain amount of heavy-handed tactics, and like other imperialists like King Leopold, the French, and the Germans knew that sacrifices needed to be made for their "civilizing mission."
Like France's "dirty war" in French Algeria, or the British Malay, or the Belgian Congo, the British war against the Mau Mau movement turned savage very quickly. Many of the details that Elkins describe are too shocking to repeat, suffice to say that thousands, possibly hundreds of thousands, suffered horrible deaths.
Overall, an important, if sordid, look into another regrettable chapter of British imperial historiography. (