|
Loading... Programming the Universe: A Quantum Computer Scientist Takes on the Cosmosby Seth LloydLibraryThing recommendationsMember recommendationsLoading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. One of the most readable books I've ever read. Extra credit to Seth Lloyd for making a mind-blowing topic such as Quantum Computation easier to grasp. ( )Although this book was written by one of the leading researchers in the field, it pretty much covers the same ground as Charles Seife's Decoding the Universe. Unfortunately, it does so with considerably less elegance and clarity. I could only bear two or three chapters of this book, so this quasi-review might not be entirely fair. The idea of a quantum computer was first broached by Richard Feynman and others in the 1980s. Lloyd gives us four reasons why building them is important: * "The first is that we can ... We now possess lasers stable enough, fabrication techniques accurate enough, and electronics fast enough to perform computation at the atomic scale." * "The second reason is that we have to -- at least if we want to keep building ever faster and more powerful computers." (This is followed by the customary, breathless retelling of Moore's law.) * "The third reason to build quantum computers is that they allow us to understand the way in which the universe registers and processes information." * "The final reason to build quantum computers is that it's fun." Reasons one, two, and four are inane and unlikely to impress anyone but the most simple readers looking to be dazzled by science candy. His prose elsewhere is vapid and patronizing (which is why I put the book aside): 'I began the initial meeting of my MIT graduate course on information in the manner I begin all of my courses: "First," I said to the twenty-odd students, "you ask questions and I'll try to answer them. Second, if you don't ask questions, I'll ask questions. Third, if you don't answer my questions, I'll tell you something I think you ought to know. Any questions?"' 'I waited. No response. 'Something was wrong. Normally, MIT students are more than happy to try to stump the professor, particularly if the alternative is that the professor will try to stump them.' I have a question: "How do I drop this course right now, you pompous fool?" Lloyd's third reason gets to the thesis of his book: that the universe is a quantum computer. What is it computing? It's computing itself. Why? Well, because he says it is. What Lloyd and others have shown is that they can model physical processes using information-processing metaphors. That's all well and good, but you can't leap from this metaphor to reality, as Lloyd does in this book. He wants us to believe that the universe really is a computer simply because it seems like one when you consider it that way. This is such a fundamental flaw in logic that I'm amazed this book got published. I am probably being a bit harsh, but this book has gotten plenty of gushing reviews -- I think it can stand some harshness. I'm genuinely interested in learning the theory behind quantum computers, but I could do without all the grandiose, unsupported claims about life and the universe. (Reviewed at Question Technology: http://www.questiontechnology.org/blo...) Best current book on multiverse as a quantum computer (July 2007). Gives primacy to information theory, saying that the universe is one big quantum computer. Lloyd states some of his points on www.edge.org (under the heading "quantum monkeys"). 0.042 seconds to build listing no reviews | add a review
Amazon.com Download Description (ISBN 022406438X, Hardcover)This book is the story of the universe and the bit. The universe is the biggest thing there is and the bit is the smallest possible chunk of information. The universe is made of bits. Every molecule, atom, and elementary particle registers bits of information. Every interaction between those pieces of the universe processes that information by altering those bits. That is, the universe computes, and because the universe is governed by the laws of quantum mechanics, it computes in an intrinsically quantum-mechanical fashion; its bits are quantum bits. The history of the universe is, in effect, a huge and ongoing quantum computation. The universe is a quantum computer.This begs the question: What does the universe compute? It computes itself. The universe computes its own behavior. As soon as the universe began, it began computing. At first, the patterns it produced were simple, comprising elementary particles and establishing the fundamental laws of physics. In time, as it processed more and more information, the universe spun out ever more intricate and complex patterns, including galaxies, stars, and planets. Life, language, human beings, society, culture-all owe their existence to the intrinsic ability of matter and energy to process information. The computational capability of the universe explains one of the great mysteries of nature: how complex systems such as living creatures can arise from fundamentally simple physical laws. These laws allow us to predict the future, but only as a matter of probability, and only on a large scale. The quantum-computational nature of the universe dictates that the details of the future are intrinsically unpredictable. They can be computed only by a computer the size of the universe itself. Otherwise, the only way to discover the future is to wait and see what happens. Allow me to introduce myself. The first thing I remember is living in a chicken house. My father was apprenticed to a furniture maker in Lincoln, Massachusetts, and the chicken house was in back of her barn. My father turned the place into a two-room apartment; the space where the chickens had roosted became bunks for my older brother and me. (My younger brother was allowed a cradle.) At night, my mother would sing to us, tuck us in, and close the wooden doors to the roosts, leaving us to lie snug and stare out the windows at the world outside. My first memory is of seeing a fire leap up in a wire trash basket with an overlapping diamond pattern. Then I remember holding tight to my mother's blue-jeaned leg just above the knee and my father flying a Japanese fighter kite. After that, memories crowd on thick and fast. Each living being's perception of the world is unique and crowded with detail and structure. Yet we all inhabit the same space and are governed by the same physical laws. In school, I learned that the physical laws governing the universe are surprisingly simple. How could it be, I wondered, that the intricacy and complexity I saw outside my bedroom window was the result of these simple physical laws? I decided to study this question and spent years learning about the laws of nature. Heinz Pagels, who died tragically in a mountaineering accident in Colorado in the summer of 1988, was a brilliant and unconventional thinker who believed in transgressing the conventional boundaries of science. He encouraged me to develop physically precise techniques for characterizing and measuring complexity. Later, under the guidance of Murray Gell-Mann at Caltech, I learned how the laws of quantum mechanics and elementary-particle physics effectively "program" the universe, planting the seeds of complexity. These days, I am a professor of mechanical engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Or, because I have no formal training in mechanical engi (retrieved from Amazon Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:58:19 -0400) The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details. |
Abebooks |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||