

|
Loading... The Sweetest Dream: A Novel (2001)by Doris Lessing
None. Just finished The Sweetest Dream a big, complex novel by Nobel Prize winner Doris Lessing. The first half of the book takes place in the 1960's and is centered around a large house in Hampstead owned by prim, traditional Julia but shared by her earth-mother ex-daughter-in-law, Frances,her two grandsons and several young people who need a home for various reasons. The interactions of the people in the house plus their individual personalities and challenges kept me turning pages. The second half jumps forward several years and takes place mostly in Africa where one of the residents of the house has become a doctor in a small village. The halves of the book are separate enough that they seem more like a book and its sequel than one book, but they are both interesting stories. My only real problem with the book is that the characters from the first half of the book run into each other in the second half in ways and places that seem very contrived. It is a compelling book and worth reading. Third volume of her autobiography, fictionalised (#1 in the 2006 book challenge) I've never read anything by this author before. I liked this book a lot, the first half takes place in the 1960s and centers around a woman whose ex-husband is a Communist activist. She and her teenage children live with her ex-MIL, and the household includes a rotating cast of her children's friends. It's an interesting look at youth culture in England in the 60s. For some reason, every description of this book I've come across ends here. However, the second half of the book is set in the early 80s, and follows some of these teenagers (although now, obviously, adults), to Africa when AIDS is first emerging as an epidemic, and that was the half that I found more intriguing. Grade: A- Recommended: To people who like novels that are about political philosophies, but not necessarily endorsing any particular political view. This is also a good book about sorts of seemingly trivial yet somehow significant happenings that make up family life, only using an unconventional family model.
But what emerges is an awkward melange lacking both the realism of great fiction and the truthfulness of history.
Amazon.com Amazon.com Review (ISBN 0060937556, Paperback)The motivating power of dream and the political price of illusions are the subject of Doris Lessing's extended family saga, The Sweetest Dream. While Frances Lennox, uncomplaining and unsentimental about her roles as a 1960s earth mother for a string of "screwed up" post-war children, serves up endless nurturing at the crowded kitchen table of a large North London house, her ex- husband pursues revolution on all-expenses-paid trips and conferences. Occasionally he drops by for free meals or to dump one of the children, or wives, of another failed marriage on Frances's doorstep. Lessing is able to turn a dispassionate eye on the economics of free love, in which women usually pay.From swinging-'60s London to liberated sub-Saharan Africa, the author depicts the human faces of a broad canvas of issues in this polemical piece. The novel ranges from anorexia to AIDS to casting a questioning eye at the morality of the travelers on the World Bank gravy train. Moving from London to the tragic landscape of post-independence "Zimlia" (a thinly veiled Zimbabwe), Lessing documents the social movement and lost dreams of a post-war generation, for whom "it is always The Dream that counts." --Rachel Holmes, Amazon.co.uk (retrieved from Amazon Mon, 07 Jan 2013 20:03:49 -0500) "This story of a family, spanning most of the twentieth century, has its fulcrum in the Sixties, that contradictory and embattled decade about which argument becomes louder each day. The youth of that time, bursting old bonds and demanding freedoms, were seen by some of their elders in a manner not at all as they saw themselves, as romantic idealists, but as deeply damaged people. Old Julia, the clan's matriarch, knows why. "You can't have two dreadful wars and then say 'That's it, and now everything will go back to normal.' They're screwed up, our children, they are the children of war."". "Remarkable women, Julia and Frances, grandmother and mother, fight for "the kids" against obstacles, the worst being Comrade Johnny. Here is a memorable picture of a character only recently departed from our scene. "The revolution comes before personal matters" is his dictum, as he deposits discarded wives and hurt children in the accommodating house whose emotional center is always the extendable kitchen table, that essential prop of the Sixties, around which the family sits through the evenings, eating, joking, boasting about their shoplifting, debating the violent ideologies of the time that take some of them out to the Third World, another to a South African village dying of AIDS."--BOOK JACKET.… (more) |
Google Books — Loading...Popular coversRatingAverage: (3.76)
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
So she holds in my life the position of a sort of mentor. The Girl Scout Guide to rad feminine life. Though she was never quite so simpatico as many others of my heroes.
And then we come to The Sweetest Dream, an odd novel that is prefaced by her disclosure that she shall not write the 3rd volume of her autobiography (because it would cause harm to others still living), but that...in this novel, she hopes to reveal the truth about the 1960's. And so on.
Well, okay then, I'm up for it. I lived through the 1960's, eagerly reading her novels. Of course, I was not in England, and possibly the whole grand dream was different there. I had forgotten how very lacking in a sense of humor Lessing is, how ponderously she loathes the communists (with all the fervour that a fallen away Catholic devotes to the evils of the Papacy), and how she does go on and on and on and on and on and on about the Terrible Failings of Everyone Else.
I suppose a Nobel prize winning novelist is too daunting to be seriously edited? Because I would have slashed this book to ribbons. There is an interesting sub-novel, in the African section, but even that has that ponderous falsity.
And the heroes and villains are set sternly in place from the start, with little cardboard traits and no real sense of...anyone. It is a shadow play, all of it (with the possible exception of the more complex character of Julia).
The best part? A novel in which the house is a main character! (