‘Under the Eagle’ is my first Simon Scarrow book and I knew before the halfway point it wouldn’t be my last.

If you like dull moments, don’t expect to find any here. This is a Roman adventure, full of action and drama, along with a little humour and a touch of romance.

Although it’s fast paced, it’s not all hell and no notion. The plot is solid and is engaging from start to end.

The characters are vivid. Cato, the main ‘star’, is my favourite. He’s believable and relatable. He’s a seventeen-year-old thrown into the Roman army with no clue what he’s doing. Worse still, his letter of recommendation results in him being given a position of responsibility as an optio, which is a centurion’s second-in-command. Earning the respect on the soldiers beneath his rank is no easy task.

The different ranks take some getting used to if, like me, your knowledge of Roman times is sparse.

Reading other reviews, I see the biggest criticism of ‘Under the Eagle’ is the language. More specifically, the use of modern English slang. My feelings on language in historical fiction is that it should be contemporary but without using modernisms like, for example, ‘It’s a corker.’

That said, the main thing is consistency. I've read historical novels where in one scene a character says something like, ‘Keep it in your trousers,’ while in another scene someone else says, ‘Whence came he thus?’ Mr Scarrow is consistent and never slips in an archaic term.

While I admit I would’ve preferred the language to not incorporate modern slang, the characters and third-person narration are engaging enough for this not to make me feel like I’m reading a story set during any period other than the first century AD.

Perhaps with me being an Englishman makes the slang words and phrases more palatable. I admit, it did annoy me when, in another historical novel, the author of that book used the odd Americanism – ‘ass’ and ‘butt’, for example – so I can understand why any non-English reader – and certainly non-British – would be distracted by the slang terms.

So, while the slang words and phrases didn’t bother me, three other elements did distract me at times. One being a trait that keeps cropping up in books I’ve read this year by different authors, namely this sort of thing: ‘more loudly’, ‘more quietly’, instead of the more concise ‘louder’ and ‘quieter’. Don’t use two words if one will do.

Adverbs: they ‘tell’, not ‘show’, and a fair few appear in this wonderful story, but not too many to spoil it.

The two points above are minor criticisms. The one big gripe I have is the overuse of ‘then’ to state what happens next. This novel is riddled with ‘thens’, at times making the third-person narrative sound like a child’s voice. It’s most frequent during the exciting actions scenes, and I found it distracting to the point that (whilst listening to this on an audio) I started predicting that the narrator would say ‘then’ in the next sentence. ‘Then’ is easy to cut when editing, and it’s not hard to drop it altogether. It ends up being a filler word, notably when using it to start a sentence. The reader knows whatever’s happening is taking place after what’s just happened, so no need to put, ‘Then he …’ and such like.

In most cases, I'll deduct a star if a book is riddled with ‘thens’ or swamped with adverbs. As someone who appreciates good writing style, these things drive me to distraction. Yet, as mentioned, ‘Under the Eagle’ is such a great story it overrode these niggling points, and I’d feel I was doing Simon Scarrow an injustice by rating this anything other than 5 stars.

It’s easier to go on and on criticising a book than it is to praise it over and over, and I’ve doubtless not expressed how impressed I am with ‘Under the Eagle’ to the extent it deserves, so, in a nutshell, I’ll state this: it’s one heck of a great read. ( )

Enjoyable adventure which bodes well for the series of five books I have purchased. Good holiday read. ( )

Newly promoted centurion Macro has a secret and if it comes out he will be reduced to the ranks again. New recruit Cato attracts the attention of a bully and is suspected of cowardice when he tries to avoid him. Can they help each other out in the run-up to Claudius's invasion of Britain?

Enjoyable Roman military fiction. I don't know why it's taken me so long to get to this. So many books, so little time. ( )

In places, particularly the battle scenes, the book was interesting. To me the biggest flaw in the book was the dialogue. Much of it sounded like modern-day teenagers. Some of it was so bad it was like fingernails on a chalkboard. The dialogue was just too inauthentic. Mr. Scarrow did do well at weaving an interesting plot line so the reader isn't sure until the end which character is the antagonist. ( )

"Under The Eagle" is first class entertainment if you're in the mood for historical military fiction.

Simon Scarrow does an excellent job in generating an insider's view of life in a Roman Legion. It feels real and immediate, even if it also sometimes feels like British Squaddies kitted-out with shields and short swords.

This a simple but exciting tale, told at just the right pace, in clear, straight forward language. The kind of language you might imagine the Legionaries themselves using.

We see the Legion from the point of view of the fictional Macro, a life-long legionary, recently promoted to Centurion; Cato, a young, well-educated, slave from the Imperial Palace, raised with to appreciate poetry and plays and now sent to Legion as a condition of being granted his freedom; and through the eyes of three real-life characters, Vespasian, the Legate commanding the Second Legion, his wife Flavia and Vitellius a Tribune under Vespasian's command. The book is set in AD43, when Claudius was planning the invasion of Britain, twenty-six years before both Vitellius and Vespasian would be declared Emperor in "The Year Of The Four Emperors".

We see the Legion in action as a garrison in Germany and follow it as it becomes part of the invasion force and presses on to meet the Britons. Along the way, Cato learns to become an Optio (second in command to the Centurion, roughly equivalent to a Lieutenant) a rank he does not have the experience for, and we have the fun of learning alongside him.

In addition to real historical events, the plot is driven by a political intrigue, centred around a chest of treasure, the Julius Caesar was forced to abandon as he retreated from Britain a hundred years earlier. It is brought to life by battle scenes that are vivid, physical, blood-soaked and just frequent enough to keep up the tension.

This is a fine start to a march through a particularly turbulent period of Roman history. David Thorpe's narration is easy on the ear, turning the inside of my head into a cinema screen and letting me sit back and enjoy the fun.

I'm looking forward to the rest of this series. I'll reach for it whenever I need a relaxing entertainment, spiced with military action and little political intrigue. ( )