HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
Search Site
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Loading...

Monsieur Verdoux [1947 film] (1947)

by Charles Chaplin (Director/Actor), Charlie Chaplin

Other authors: Audrey Betz (Actor), Mady Correll (Actor), Robert Lewis (Actor), Martha Raye (Actor), Allison Roddan (Actor)

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingConversations
572453,397 (3.63)None
In this dark comedy first released during WWII, Henri Vedoux, played by Charlie Chaplin, supports his family by first marrying, and then killing wealthy widows. On another level the film is an indictment of war in which mass murder is legalized, celebrated and paraded. "Killing is the enterprise by which your system prospers," Verdoux says. "As a mass killer, I am an amateur by comparison."… (more)
None
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

Showing 2 of 2
A man murders wealthy women to support his family.

When it's funny, it's good (although never great), but there's a lot of movie here that's more along the lines of serious drama. I can't help thinking of this as Time Travelin' Charlie Chaplin's attempt at making a Coen Brothers movie - which sounds like a great thing, except it's not. Chaplin's a great comic, but I don't think he's much of a filmmaker. I understand it's a groundbreaking movie, but when you've seen some of the great black comedies that followed it, it doesn't hold up.

Concept: B
Story: B
Characters: B
Dialog: B
Pacing: B
Cinematography: C
Special effects/design: B
Acting: C
Music: B

Enjoyment: C plus

GPA: 2.7/4 ( )
  comfypants | Feb 3, 2016 |
The film is about an unemployed banker, Henri Verdoux, and his sociopathic methods of attaining income. While being both loyal and competent in his work, Verdoux has been laid-off. To make money for his wife and child, he marries wealthy widows and then murders them. His crime spree eventually works against him when two particular widows break his normal routine.
(source: TMDb)
  aptrvideo | Apr 8, 2021 |
Showing 2 of 2
Monsieur Verdoux is really two films, one a sentimental melodrama, the other a comedy in the old Chaplin style that burlesques the melodrama. What makes it confusing is that Chaplin shifts gears between the two without apparently knowing he is doing so. He will be strutting around in a comic scene with Martha Raye, flourishing his moustaches in an exquisitely shaded parody of the stock-company notion of a boulevardier, and in the next scene, with a pretty street waif as his foil, he will be playing the part straight, hamming it up with innocent relish...

It was a sad day for Chaplin when the intellectuals convinced him he was the Tragic Clown, the Little Man. From a parodist he graduated into a philosopher, but since his epistemology was all instinctive, even physical (his eyebrows, fingers, teeth “know” precisely, instantaneously, how to behave in order to mimic a clergyman, a banker, a dandy, a tramp), it didn’t help him in his new role. The nature of reality, which he understood intuitively as a mime, became opaque to him when he tried to think about it, and where he once danced lightly he now stumbles into bathos and sentimentality.
added by SnootyBaronet | editEncounter, Dwight Macdonald
 
In the revolutionary act of making the screen say something, Chaplin has made it say too much. There is more material in his latest film than he is able to manage—which is to say, more than any living dramatic artist could manage. Had Chaplin been content to say something about capitalism, he could have done so with brilliant clarity. Actually, he blurred the edges of his main statement with perhaps incompatible and certainly irrelevant statements on other subjects no less enormous—such as the problem of evil and (what may be the same thing) the problem of women. It is hard to write a Critique of Political Economy and an Apologia pro Vita Sua at the same time...

I am much addicted to playgoing. I have seen Jonson and Moliere competently and even expertly performed. But I wonder if the competence and expertness of a hundred different productions taught me more about the way comedy works than the film Monsieur Verdoux. I can now imagine what sort of performance a Jonson or Moliere play would require before it could fully exist.
added by SnootyBaronet | editThe Kenyon Review, Eric Bentley (Sep 1, 1948)
 
Talent is sometimes forgiven in Hollywood, genius never. They smell it out and seek its death. As soon as it was known that Charlie had a work in progress, before anything had been seen outside his strictly guarded studio, the critics made ready to damn it. In America the abuse of his new film has been almost unanimous. Now it has come to Europe. I trust we shall give it a very different reception...

The precision with which he performs every movement is the ballet dancer’s. Watch him demonstrate with a turn of the foot the quality of the floor in the house he is trying to sell. Study him laying the breakfast table, first for two, then, as he suddenly remembers the successful murder of the preceding night, for one. There is a scene in this film with the detective and a bottle of poisoned wine, which I will not spoil by telling. I wish merely to record that it is without qualification the finest piece of acting and dramatic construction I have ever seen.
added by SnootyBaronet | editEvening Standard, Evelyn Waugh (Nov 4, 1947)
 
Chaplin’s theme, the greatest and the most appropriate to its time that he has yet undertaken, is the bare problem of surviving at all in such a world as this. With his usual infallibility of instinct he has set his story in Europe; Europeans are aware of survival as a problem, as we are not. As rightly, he has set aside the tramp, whose charming lessons in survival are too wishful for his purposes, for his first image of the Responsible Man.
added by SnootyBaronet | editThe Nation, James Agee (Jun 21, 1947)
 

» Add other authors (5 possible)

Author nameRoleType of authorWork?Status
Chaplin, CharlesDirector/Actorprimary authorall editionsconfirmed
Chaplin, Charliemain authorall editionsconfirmed
Betz, AudreyActorsecondary authorall editionsconfirmed
Correll, MadyActorsecondary authorall editionsconfirmed
Lewis, RobertActorsecondary authorall editionsconfirmed
Raye, MarthaActorsecondary authorall editionsconfirmed
Roddan, AllisonActorsecondary authorall editionsconfirmed
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Epigraph
Dedication
First words
Quotations
I shall see you ALL soon - very soon.
One murder makes a villain; millions, a hero. Numbers sanctify, my good fellow!
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS
Canonical LCC

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English

None

In this dark comedy first released during WWII, Henri Vedoux, played by Charlie Chaplin, supports his family by first marrying, and then killing wealthy widows. On another level the film is an indictment of war in which mass murder is legalized, celebrated and paraded. "Killing is the enterprise by which your system prospers," Verdoux says. "As a mass killer, I am an amateur by comparison."

No library descriptions found.

Book description
Haiku summary

Current Discussions

None

Popular covers

Quick Links

Rating

Average: (3.63)
0.5
1
1.5
2 1
2.5
3 3
3.5
4 2
4.5
5 2

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 203,286,293 books! | Top bar: Always visible