HomeGroupsTalkZeitgeist
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.
Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Sacred Tears: Sentimentality in Victorian…
Loading...

Sacred Tears: Sentimentality in Victorian Literature

by Fred Kaplan

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
1011,280,053 (2.5)8

None.

None
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

» See also 8 mentions

Anyone who has read any Victorian literature know that there is no shortage of emotion. Women faint, men become apoplectic, and everybody’s feelings are visible on their sleeves. While discussing each other’s works, authors in 19th century England began to put a name to this element—sentiment. There is no single way to define it. Fred Kaplan’s Sacred Tears: Sentimentality in Victorian Literature does, however, try to synthesize all the various arguments surrounding this feature to give us a window into both the literature and the lives of the time.

Kaplan finally settles on a vague-ish definition of sentimentality. It is the “disposition to attribute to emotion undue importance, to be governed by emotion rather than reason, or the tendency to excessive indulgence in or an insincere display of emotion.” Sentimentality gives regular emotional display its viscerality. The truly sentimental will be irrational but still be governed by certain truths. Kaplan examines the works of Charles Dickens, William Makepeace Thackeray, Henry Fielding, and Thomas Carlyle to show how this sentimentality shows the essential goodness of humanity.

Scientific and technological development in the 1800s led to the feeling that the relative importance of humanity was shrinking in the face of the grand rule-set of the universe. Artistic sentimentality, especially that where the sentimental was also equated with the moral and the good, helped to prove that no amount of gears or microscopes could lessen our nature. The sacred tears of the title references those tears that are genuine, those that flow to show the inner feelings of those that shed them.

While it’s been a decade since I earned my degree in English, this brought back the good old days. Kaplan dives into the characters, plots, and nuances of Victorian literature to illuminate a small piece for us. He argues that the sentiment established in the writing of the day was ultimately meant to put forward the better parts of our nature, regardless of the misdeeds and mangled lives of some of the characters. Kaplan does a decent job of writing for the literary enthusiast and not just the academic. One does, however, have to be a little familiar with the works discussed for it to have full effect. A short but decent book. ( )
  NielsenGW | Apr 28, 2013 |
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Series (with order)
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Awards and honors
Epigraph
Dedication
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Publisher series
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English (1)

Book description
Haiku summary

No descriptions found.

An absorbing study of the evolution of sentiment in Victorian life and literature What is sentimentality, and where did it come from? For acclaimed scholar and biographer Fred Kaplan, the seeds were planted by the British moral philosophers of the eighteenth century. The Victorians gained from them a theory of human nature, a belief in the innateness of benevolent moral instincts; sentiment, in turn, emerged as a set of shared moral feelings in opposition to both scientific realism and the more ego-driven energies of Romanticism. Sacred Tears investigates the profound ways in which seminal writers Charles Dickens, William Makepeace Thackeray, and Thomas Carlyle were influenced by the philosophies of David Hume and Adam Smith, and by novelists of the same period. Exploring sentiment in its original context-one often forgotten or overlooked-Kaplan's study is a stimulating fusion of intellectual history and literary criticism, and holds no small importance for questions of art and morality as they exist today.… (more)

Quick Links

Popular covers

Rating

Average: (2.5)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5 1
3
3.5
4
4.5
5

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 134,225,214 books! | Top bar: Always visible