Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

The First Folio of Shakespeare: The Norton Facsimile by William Shakespeare
Loading...

The First Folio of Shakespeare: The Norton Facsimile

by William Shakespeare

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingConversations
130447,803 (4.64)2
Info:

W. W. Norton & Company (1996), Edition: 2 Sub, Hardcover, 928 pages

Member:Eqes3n
Collections:Your libraryRating:
Tags:None
Loading...
won't like will probably not like will probably like will like will love

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

Showing 4 of 4
A beautiful reproduction of the First Folio. ( )
  KennethWDavis | Feb 28, 2009 |
Probably the most wonderful book in my collection: A life-size facimile of the First Folio of Shakespeare, which offers each play in its rugged glory (untouched by modern editors, that is). Peter W. M. Blayney's "The First Folio of Shakespeare" constitutes an insightful and scholarly companion (available from the Folger Library's web site last time I checked).

For a well-crafted online introduction to the First Folio, visit: http://www.rscshakespeare.co.uk/first...

To view the First Folio online, visit: http://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/Li...
or
http://dewey.library.upenn.edu/sceti/...

To view tips for reading the First Folio, see:
http://dewey.library.upenn.edu/sceti/... ( )
  wdewysockie | Aug 6, 2008 |
I've read all of Shakespeare's plays before, but reading the first folio is very rewarding. If you are into Shakespeare, it's the only way to go! ( )
  Cynfrank | Feb 1, 2007 |
I should explain here my * star rating for the First Folio of Shakespeare that I use from time to time as a reference: parts of some plates of the Norton facsimile are not legible enough. Besides, the 17c. idiosyncrasies and the original spelling are too difficult for me. I need an hour to decipher a page. Too long to savour. This is my fault, not Shakespeare's... ( )
  Pepys | Jan 24, 2007 |
Showing 4 of 4
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Series (with order)
Canonical Title
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Awards and honors
Epigraph
Dedication
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English (2)

Timeline of Shakespeare criticism

William Shakespeare

Book description

Amazon.com (ISBN 0393039854, Hardcover)

Charlton Hinman's facsimile of Shakespeare's First Folio was a colossal achievement when it was first published in 1968, and its reputation is further enhanced by this beautiful second edition. Looking for a way to provide scholars with a reliable version of Shakespeare's text, Hinman invented a device that sped up the collation process, allowing him to compare 82 of the surviving copies of the Folio and bring to light features of Shakespeare's work that have been--and continue to be--edited out of most modern editions. A Midsummer Night's Dream, for example, contains what are known as false starts, fragments of earlier versions of certain speeches. These traces of the composition process survive only because the printers, working directly from Shakespeare's handwritten copy, were not given a chance to thoroughly proofread their work. Though they would make crucial changes during the printing process, it was too wasteful to throw away pages that were already printed. Thus, when they went to bind the Folios, each book contained a fascinating patchwork of corrected and uncorrected copy.

Also hidden beneath the familiar text of the plays is a portrait of the printers who created the book. Their names remain unknown, but Professor Hinman was able to track individuals' work by examining their spelling habits. Their story is as important to this book as the works of literature that it contains. The many errors the printers introduced into the text of Shakespeare's work still provide fertile ground for theatrical and academic debate. Hamlet, for example, wishes that his "too, too solid flesh would melt."--or is it his "sullied" flesh, or perhaps his "sallied" flesh? Which is Shakespeare, and which is an error? We cannot blame the printers; they spent long hours setting page after page of tiny type, working in a cramped space that smelled strongly of the stale urine they used to soften the inking pads. It is ironic that the most revered symbol of English high culture owes its existence--in part, at least--to the productive bladders of a handful of pressmen. This book gives these men their due, demonstrating the extent to which Shakespeare's plays were the work not just of one man but of a whole society.

(retrieved from Amazon Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:58:09 -0400)

(see all 2 descriptions)

The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details.

Quick Links

Ebooks Audio Swap
0/14

Popular covers

 

Help/FAQs | About | Privacy/Terms | Blog | Contact | LibraryThing.com | APIs | WikiThing | Common Knowledge | 47,151,973 books!