|
Loading... Applied Economics: Thinking Beyond Stage Oneby Thomas Sowell
LibraryThing recommendationsMember recommendations
Loading...
won't like
will probably not like
will probably like
will like
will love Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. no reviews | add a review
References to this work on external resources.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book description |
|
(retrieved from Amazon Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:58:05 -0400)
The first test round has been closed. Visit the Open Shelves Classification group for details.
Quick Links |
The book opens a bit slowly, repeating the organising ability of free market prices, but then launches into the economic realities of slavery, with lots of odd facts and figures from history. Like that the value of the life of a black slave in the American South, as being the property of a rich man, was higher than that of an Irishman, being owned by his poor self; and that the Soviet Gulag slaves were actually less profitable than paid workers doing the same job.
A bit slower, or at least less intriguing, is the next section dealing with the health service. Noting that medicine makers need money for research and that this has to be taken out of pill prices is a bit of a yawn. Next up is high California house prices and the reasons for this, selfish and hypocritical lefties being to blame here as elsewhere!
Then we’re into discrimination. Mr Sowell has a lot of examples showing that capitalists, be they anti Jew, anti Black or anti Pole, still hires those who will make their firms most profitable. And he has the figures to show that equally qualified people to a large degree have been paid the same salary (in a free market), even before anti discrimination laws.
The book ends with a section on the economic development of nations; the author finding the long backwardness of Africa more likely to stem from that continent's lack of navigable waterways than anything explainable with an exploitation theory.
In spite of the perhaps all too expectable conclusions all through the book that laissez-faire is good and state intervention bad, this is really an entertaining “believe it or not” collection of economic facts and figures. I found it a good read. (