

|
Loading... Bright Earth: Art and the Invention of Color (original 2001; edition 2002)by Philip Ball
Work detailsBright Earth: Art and the Invention of Color by Philip Ball (2001)
None. Lots of information about pigments and dyes and how these are used scientifically to identify a work of art. Very good information for those interested in delving deeper into the history of color. Colour is easy to take as grant. However, the great painters of the history worked often with a very limited palettes, as good pigments simply weren't invented. The best blues and reds were very valuable, which defined the ways they were used in medieval painting. There's plenty of detail in the history of art that can be explained by the economics and chemistry of paint. Philip Ball is a chemist and painters will learn a lot of chemistry from this book. Chemists will learn about art and painting and curious reader will learn both. The book is clearly written, entertaining and educational: an excellent example of good popular science. There are plenty of interesting details, as Ball goes through the history of art and pigments from the stone age cave paintings to modern art. (Review based on the Finnish translation.) (Original review at my review site) I enjoyed this book very much, as it explains in a clear and chronological way the development of pigments, dyes and other materials. It shows the importance of industry in its continuous search for less expensive and more durable dyes and new art trends. I found the book so motivating that I bought from Kremer Pigmente (Germany) samples of the pigments used by the artists in the Middle Ages, just to have a "feel" of the real color! Tracing the history of painting (primarily European) by describing advances in technology and chemistry, this book is excellent. It was relatively easy to read and has many color reproductions to illustrate the various points as well as monochrome figures. I was interested in the evolution of pigments from raw minerals mined from the ground through chemical pigment manufacture in the twentieth century. It was also interesting to learn how methods of painting have changed from fresco and egg tempura through oils and into acrylics and other types of paint. Changes to color theory through time are also described in this volume, which is something I previously knew next to nothing about. Reading this book, artists will learn about chemistry and chemists will learn about art. no reviews | add a review
Amazon.com Amazon.com Review (ISBN 0226036286, Paperback)The making of a painting relies on inspiration, craft, practice, and vision. But, observes the noted science writer Philip Ball, it also hinges on science: "For as long as painters have fashioned their visions and dreams into images, they have relied on technical knowledge and skill to supply their materials."In this lively study, Ball examines some of the tools and materials that chemists have added to the palette over the centuries. He also takes his readers on a learned tour of what science has taught us about vision, the nature of light, and the physical and cultural factors that condition our perceptions of color (the ancient Romans, he notes, had no term for brown or gray, but that does not mean they didn't use earth pigments in their work). Whether writing of matters scientific or artistic, Ball is a technologist but not a determinist. In the end, he writes, art depends not on science but on artists, and "each artist makes his or her own contract with the colors of the time." Readers with an interest in science, art, and the crossroads where they meet will relish Ball's erudite travels across the spectrum of light. --Gregory McNamee (retrieved from Amazon Tue, 08 Jan 2013 06:20:45 -0500) "Bright Earth provides a glimpse into a little-explored avenue in the history of art and science: the creation of pigments and dyes and their influence on painting, as well as on fashion, merchandising, and the textile and chemical industries. For as long as artists have turned their dreams into images, they have relied on technical knowledge to supply their materials. Today almost every shade imaginable is easily available in off-the-shelf tubes; every hue and tincture is manufactured and ready for immediate use by the painter. But up until the eighteenth century, most artists ground and mixed their own pigments, and by necessity had considerable skill as a practical chemists."--BOOK JACKET.… (more) (summary from another edition) |
Google Books — Loading...Popular coversRatingAverage: (4.06)
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It sometimes felt a little bit like ‘The quantum story' (http://www.librarything.com/work/10894069/book/75212785), but just because of the chemical names and combinations; the subject matter is more accessible. There was an interesting chapter on time as a painter and the idea that we won't see the paintings as they were when they were first completed, either due to natural wear, or because the pigments weren't stable enough. I wonder what will be left of the art produced now for people to look at in five hundred or a thousand years' time. (