Big news! LibraryThing is now free to all! Read the blog post and discuss the change on Talk.
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.
Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition…

Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition (Routledge Classics S.) (original 1964; edition 2002)

by Frances Yates

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
689822,985 (4.44)26
Giordano Bruno is known as the Prophet of the New Age, and his vision of an infinite universe grounded in science is increasingly celebrated. One of the principal forces behind his rediscovery was the great British historian Frances Yates. In calling attention to Giordono Bruno, she paved the way for a revaluation of the esoteric influences at play during the onset of the modern era. Today, when traditional answers about the universe and our place within it are under increasing scrutiny, Giordono Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition proves itself a true classic for our time.… (more)
Title:Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition (Routledge Classics S.)
Authors:Frances Yates
Info:Routledge,an imprint of Taylor & Francis Books Ltd (2002), Edition: New Ed, Paperback
Collections:Your library
Tags:Giordano Bruno, History, hermetica

Work details

Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition by Frances A. Yates (1964)


Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

» See also 26 mentions

English (6)  Spanish (1)  French (1)  All languages (8)
Showing 1-5 of 6 (next | show all)
Opera bellissima, appassionata, precisa della Yates sul grande Giordano Bruno. Analizza e ricostruisce il pensiero filosofico del Bruno, simbolo del nostro pensiero libero, riconducendolo alla tradizione magica ci restituisce la splendida figura ed ermetica rinascimentale, al tal punto frainteso da metterlo al rogo. ( )
  Maistrack | May 28, 2016 |
Good but dated (1964), where I started after our Moon landing and after 15pp of B's Latin poem on the Innumerable Worlds (400pp). Also, GB as magus* is only 1/4 the story. You'd never guess from this that 1) GB wrote a hilarious comedy, Candelaio*; and 2) GB laughed aloud after quoting Aristotle, which he mastered, and taught at the U of Toulouse (1579). 3) He also mastered Copernicus (spherical geometry) and wrote five books on math (one anticipating calculus, De minimo). He interviewed for the open Chair of Math (U Padua, 1592) won by a guy who had published only one piece --on art. The winner would not publish on math (and astronomy) for 16 more years when he became a household name, though Kepler said he used Bruno's habitable idea unacknowledged: Galileo Galilei.

* GB did write 4 books (of his 26) on magic, but he also satirizes Magi in his comedy, with 4 of 'em of different stripes: Scaramuré (whom men trust to improve love, a Caribbean obeah doctor in my version), Bartolomeo the working chemist-alchemist, Cencio the conman-alchemist, and Consalvo the spice-pharmaceutical agent. ( )
1 vote AlanWPowers | Mar 5, 2016 |
Great book. I actually read it on Spanish. ( )
  LeoChile | Jul 15, 2014 |
Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition purports to trace the history of Hermeticism from the time a Greek manuscript of the so-called Corpus Hermeticum was brought to Florence in 1453, at the time of the fall of Constantinople to the Turks. At the behest of Cosimo de Medici it was soon translated into Latin by Marsilio Ficino, one of few Italians who had studied Greek. The Corpus is a collection of mystical tracts in the form of dialogues, hymns, dream visions, prayers, and scripture-like accounts which are now understood to have been written by various persons during the early Middle Ages, but at the time of their introduction into Renaissance Italy, they were believed to be by Hermes Trismegistus who, again according to belief at the time had lived contemporaneously with Moses, but was later determined to be a mythical character who possibly had never lived at all.

This little collection of tracts, which had much in common with the Neoplatonic philosophy that was already widely accepted, had an electrifying effect on many of the learned men who fell under its spell, and it set off an amazing train of events which may have indirectly influenced the development of science and mathematics leading up to and during the Enlightenment.

What was the excitement all about? As a supposed contemporary of Moses, Hermes' writings were believed to foretell Christ much as the Hebrew Bible did. This was important to the intellectuals who saw the Church as more a purveyor of corruption and authoritarianism rather than as a fount of morality and spirituality. Since the Church was not a source of spiritual sustenance, those with a spiritual hunger were willing to seek nourishment wherever it lay, and they attempted to reconcile Hermeticism with Christianity in an effort to stay within the good graces of the Church.

The Corpus Hermeticum was a deeply spiritual collection of texts. However, it was not the first Hermetic document known to Renaissance scholars. An earlier medieval Latin manuscript called the Picatrix had been circulating down through the ages. It was largely a text of magical or theurgical procedures. While the Renaissance sages like Ficino were steeped in astrology, they steered clear of outright magic because of the stance of the Church which was burning people at the stake for heresy. Magic definitely fell under the heading of heresy.

Thus there were two kinds of Hermeticism: one gnostic and spiritual in the tradition of the Corpus Hermeticum and the other occult and magical following more in the tradition of the Picatrix.

Frances Yates traces the history of magical Hermeticism from Ficino and Pico della Mirandola to Cornelius Agrippa, Giordano Bruno, Thomas Campanella and Robert Fludd. Each of these individuals put his own individual mark on the theory and practice of Renaissance magic.

The first half of the book provides background on Hermeticism. The second focuses on Bruno and the aftermath of the discovery by philologist Lorenzo Valla that the Corpus Hermeticum did not trace back to the era of Moses after all but was written and compiled somewhere around the second or third century A.D.

After crawling through four hundred pages of history and historiography, the real payoff comes in the final chapter where Yates credits not the practitioners but their critics with hastening the development of science and mathematics. It is Yates' position that the level of analysis achieved prepared the way for more and more rigorous thought processes. For example, Bruno was a believer in the Copernican theory of heliocentricity, but his belief came through a version of Pythagorean numerology. Copernicus and his follower Johann Kepler used actual astronomical observations and pure mathematics to reach their own conclusions. The trend toward pure mathematics led to Descartes and all that followed. The condemnation of Bruno to burn at the stake has been attributed to his belief in Copernican heliocentricity. But there was much more to it than that.

Only the most dedicated reader will want to slog through this entire book. I almost quit halfway through. The more it concentrated on magic, the more my interest waned. But in the end, I would have to give this book the highest marks both for what it explains, for the clarity of the narrative — except for all the irritating untranslated Latin quotations — and for the conclusions it reached, which shed important light on the history of science. ( )
2 vote Poquette | Jun 30, 2014 |
Frances Yates was a pioneer in recognizing that the occult preoccupations of Renaissance scholars were just as worthy of study as their interests in classical literature and science. Bruno's story is particularly interesting, in that he came to his peculiar view of the world more or less on his own, by accumulating all sorts of knowledge and then forming a world-view that accounted for what he perceived. Yates does an excellent job of accounting for Bruno's sources of information and shows why - far from being a man out of time - he was formed by and representative of the intellectual traditions of his time. ( )
2 vote tom1066 | Nov 22, 2007 |
Showing 1-5 of 6 (next | show all)
no reviews | add a review

» Add other authors (2 possible)

Author nameRoleType of authorWork?Status
Yates, Frances A.primary authorall editionsconfirmed
Leeuwenhoek, KarinEditorsecondary authorsome editionsconfirmed
Rijnders, JosTranslatorsecondary authorsome editionsconfirmed

Belongs to Series

Belongs to Publisher Series

You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Series (with order)
Information from the French Common Knowledge. Edit to localize it to your language.
Canonical title
Original title
Information from the Dutch Common Knowledge. Edit to localize it to your language.
Alternative titles
Original publication date
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Awards and honors
First words
The great forward movements of the Renaissance all derive their vigor, their emotional impulse, from looking backwards.
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Publisher series
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS

No library descriptions found.

Book description
Haiku summary

Quick Links

Popular covers


Average: (4.44)
1.5 1
2 1
3 6
3.5 2
4 19
4.5 3
5 43

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.


About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 147,811,232 books! | Top bar: Always visible